e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
For the
quarterly period ended May 2,
2010
|
or
|
|
o
|
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number 000-06920
Applied Materials,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
94-1655526
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
3050 Bowers Avenue,
P.O. Box 58039
Santa Clara, California
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
95052-8039
(Zip
Code)
|
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(408) 727-5555
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding of the issuers common stock
as of May 2, 2010: 1,342,979,263
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,295,540
|
|
|
$
|
1,020,077
|
|
|
$
|
4,144,442
|
|
|
$
|
2,353,473
|
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
1,368,648
|
|
|
|
864,558
|
|
|
|
2,506,366
|
|
|
|
1,806,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
926,892
|
|
|
|
155,519
|
|
|
|
1,638,076
|
|
|
|
547,095
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research, development and engineering
|
|
|
305,928
|
|
|
|
236,335
|
|
|
|
574,931
|
|
|
|
465,875
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
125,779
|
|
|
|
101,080
|
|
|
|
250,578
|
|
|
|
242,321
|
|
Marketing and selling
|
|
|
100,420
|
|
|
|
84,678
|
|
|
|
197,615
|
|
|
|
168,793
|
|
Restructuring and asset impairments
|
|
|
8,968
|
|
|
|
26,709
|
|
|
|
112,812
|
|
|
|
159,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
541,095
|
|
|
|
448,802
|
|
|
|
1,135,936
|
|
|
|
1,036,470
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
385,797
|
|
|
|
(293,283
|
)
|
|
|
502,140
|
|
|
|
(489,375
|
)
|
Pre-tax loss of equity method investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,983
|
|
Impairment of equity method investment and strategic investments
|
|
|
3,671
|
|
|
|
77,081
|
|
|
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
77,081
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
|
|
5,058
|
|
|
|
10,266
|
|
|
|
11,052
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
10,132
|
|
|
|
11,789
|
|
|
|
18,773
|
|
|
|
27,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
387,052
|
|
|
|
(382,808
|
)
|
|
|
505,786
|
|
|
|
(585,467
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
123,048
|
|
|
|
(127,418
|
)
|
|
|
159,031
|
|
|
|
(197,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
264,004
|
|
|
$
|
(255,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
346,755
|
|
|
$
|
(388,324
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1,344,617
|
|
|
|
1,331,729
|
|
|
|
1,343,229
|
|
|
|
1,330,476
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1,352,436
|
|
|
|
1,331,729
|
|
|
|
1,350,802
|
|
|
|
1,330,476
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements.
2
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,596,429
|
|
|
$
|
1,576,381
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
738,433
|
|
|
|
638,349
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
1,437,746
|
|
|
|
1,041,495
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
1,690,445
|
|
|
|
1,627,457
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
432,735
|
|
|
|
356,336
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,760
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
277,506
|
|
|
|
264,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
6,173,294
|
|
|
|
5,688,947
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
1,230,214
|
|
|
|
1,052,165
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,083,525
|
|
|
|
1,090,433
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,336,426
|
|
|
|
1,170,932
|
|
Purchased technology and other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
346,228
|
|
|
|
306,416
|
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets
|
|
|
280,062
|
|
|
|
265,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,449,749
|
|
|
$
|
9,574,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,803
|
|
|
$
|
1,240
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,440,225
|
|
|
|
1,061,502
|
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenue
|
|
|
980,658
|
|
|
|
864,280
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
153,134
|
|
|
|
12,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,575,820
|
|
|
|
1,939,457
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
204,847
|
|
|
|
200,654
|
|
Employee benefits and other liabilities
|
|
|
348,001
|
|
|
|
339,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,128,668
|
|
|
|
2,479,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $.01 par value per share;
2,500,000 shares authorized; 1,342,979 and
1,340,917 shares outstanding at May 2, 2010 and
October 25, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
13,430
|
|
|
|
13,409
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
5,348,780
|
|
|
|
5,195,437
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
11,106,136
|
|
|
|
10,934,004
|
|
Treasury stock: 515,885 and 508,254 shares at May 2,
2010 and October 25, 2009, respectively, net
|
|
|
(9,146,562
|
)
|
|
|
(9,046,562
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
|
(1,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
7,321,081
|
|
|
|
7,094,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
10,449,749
|
|
|
$
|
9,574,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Amounts as of May 2, 2010 are unaudited. Amounts as of
October 25, 2009 are derived from the October 25, 2009
audited consolidated financial statements. |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements.
3
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Six Months Ended May 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 25, 2009
|
|
|
1,340,917
|
|
|
$
|
13,409
|
|
|
$
|
5,195,437
|
|
|
$
|
10,934,004
|
|
|
$
|
(9,046,562
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,680
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,094,608
|
|
Components of comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,755
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
Change in defined and postretirement benefit plans liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,625
|
)
|
|
|
(1,625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,732
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174,623
|
)
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,330
|
|
Issuance under stock plans, net of a tax detriment of $1,897 and
other
|
|
|
9,693
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
91,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,110
|
|
Treasury stock repurchases
|
|
|
(7,631
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,076
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 2, 2010
|
|
|
1,342,979
|
|
|
$
|
13,430
|
|
|
$
|
5,348,780
|
|
|
$
|
11,106,136
|
|
|
$
|
(9,146,562
|
)
|
|
$
|
(703
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,321,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
346,755
|
|
|
$
|
(388,324
|
)
|
Adjustments required to reconcile net income (loss) to cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
163,178
|
|
|
|
146,108
|
|
Loss on fixed asset retirements
|
|
|
11,658
|
|
|
|
7,002
|
|
Provision for bad debts
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
62,539
|
|
Restructuring and asset impairments
|
|
|
112,812
|
|
|
|
159,481
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(74,546
|
)
|
|
|
35,927
|
|
Net recognized loss on investments
|
|
|
9,247
|
|
|
|
10,915
|
|
Pretax loss of equity method investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,983
|
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
77,081
|
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
|
62,330
|
|
|
|
72,780
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of amounts
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(364,631
|
)
|
|
|
714,096
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(909
|
)
|
|
|
85,993
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
184,760
|
|
|
|
(174,796
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
13,411
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(9,521
|
)
|
|
|
(1,144
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
211,009
|
|
|
|
(649,976
|
)
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenue
|
|
|
110,519
|
|
|
|
(262,760
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
138,109
|
|
|
|
(71,943
|
)
|
Employee benefits and other liabilities
|
|
|
(12,125
|
)
|
|
|
27,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
898,833
|
|
|
|
(100,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(97,874
|
)
|
|
|
(128,099
|
)
|
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(322,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
|
|
|
539,515
|
|
|
|
925,485
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(828,582
|
)
|
|
|
(486,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(709,540
|
)
|
|
|
310,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt repayments, net
|
|
|
(5,320
|
)
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
Proceeds from common stock issuances
|
|
|
97,217
|
|
|
|
27,633
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
(100,076
|
)
|
|
|
(22,906
|
)
|
Payment of dividends to stockholders
|
|
|
(161,069
|
)
|
|
|
(159,736
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(169,248
|
)
|
|
|
(155,332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
20,048
|
|
|
|
55,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
1,576,381
|
|
|
|
1,411,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
1,596,429
|
|
|
$
|
1,466,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for income taxes
|
|
$
|
98,385
|
|
|
$
|
133,250
|
|
Cash refunds for income taxes
|
|
$
|
196,149
|
|
|
$
|
50,122
|
|
Cash payments for interest
|
|
$
|
7,195
|
|
|
$
|
7,211
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements.
5
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Note 1
|
Basis of
Presentation
|
Basis
of Presentation
In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated
condensed financial statements of Applied Materials, Inc. and
its subsidiaries (Applied or the Company) included herein have
been prepared on a basis consistent with the October 25,
2009 audited consolidated financial statements and include all
material adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary to fairly present the information set
forth therein. These unaudited interim consolidated condensed
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
included in Applieds Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 25, 2009 (2009
Form 10-K).
Applieds results of operations for the three and six
months ended May 2, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of
future operating results.
Applieds fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in October of
each year. Fiscal 2010 contains 53 weeks, while fiscal 2009
contained 52 weeks, and the first six months of fiscal 2010
contained 27 weeks, while the first six months of fiscal
2009 contained 26 weeks.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make judgments, estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ
materially from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, Applied
evaluates its estimates, including those related to accounts
receivable and sales allowances, fair values of financial
instruments, intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of
intangible assets and property and equipment, fair values of
stock-based awards, and income taxes, among others. Applied
bases its estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Revenue
Recognition
Applied recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition
criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
sellers price to buyer is fixed or determinable; and
collectability is probable. Applieds shipping terms are
customarily FOB Applied shipping point or equivalent terms.
Applieds revenue recognition policy generally results in
revenue recognition at the following points: (1) for all
transactions where legal title passes to the customer upon
shipment, Applied recognizes revenue upon shipment for all
products that have been demonstrated to meet product
specifications prior to shipment; the portion of revenue
associated with certain installation-related tasks is deferred,
and that revenue is recognized upon completion of the
installation-related tasks; (2) for products that have not
been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to
shipment, revenue is recognized at customer technical
acceptance; (3) for transactions where legal title does not
pass at shipment, revenue is recognized when legal title passes
to the customer, which is generally at customer technical
acceptance; (4) for arrangements initiated prior to
fiscal 2010 containing multiple elements, the revenue relating
to the undelivered elements is deferred at their estimated
relative fair values until delivery of the deferred elements;
and (5) for arrangements initiated or materially modified
during fiscal 2010 containing multiple elements, the revenue
relating to the undelivered elements is deferred using the
relative selling price method utilizing estimated sales prices
until delivery of the deferred elements. Applied limits the
amount of revenue recognition for delivered elements to the
amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products
or services, future performance obligations or subject to
customer-specified return or adjustment. In cases where Applied
has sold products that have been demonstrated to meet product
specifications prior to shipment, Applied believes that at the
time of delivery, it has an enforceable claim to amounts
recognized as revenue. The completed contract method is used for
SunFabtm
thin film lines. Certain SunFab thin film contracts have
provisions for additional amounts to become due to Applied if
the line achieves certain output criteria subsequent to factory
6
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
acceptance. Any additional amounts earned under these contracts
are recognized upon achievement. Spare parts revenue is
generally recognized upon shipment, and services revenue is
generally recognized over the period that the services are
provided.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied elected to early
adopt amended accounting standards issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for multiple deliverable
revenue arrangements on a prospective basis for applicable
transactions originating or materially modified after
October 25, 2009. The new standard changes the requirements
for establishing separate units of accounting in a multiple
element arrangement and requires the allocation of arrangement
consideration to each deliverable to be based on the relative
selling price. The FASB also amended the accounting standards
for revenue recognition to exclude software that is contained in
a tangible product from the scope of software revenue guidance
if the software is essential to the tangible products
functionality. Implementation of this new authoritative guidance
had an insignificant impact on reported net sales as compared to
net sales under previous guidance, as the new guidance did not
change the units of accounting within sales arrangements and the
elimination of the residual method for the allocation of
arrangement consideration had an inconsequential impact on the
amount and timing of reported net sales. Accordingly, Applied
does not believe that the effect of adopting these standards
will have a material impact on future financial periods.
For fiscal 2010 and future periods, when a sales arrangement
contains multiple elements, such as hardware and services
and/or
software products, Applied allocates revenue to each element
based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a
deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence
(VSOE) if available, third party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not
available, or estimated selling price (ESP) if neither VSOE nor
TPE is available. Applied generally utilizes the ESP due to the
nature of its products. In multiple element arrangements where
more-than-incidental
software deliverables are included, revenue is allocated to each
separate unit of accounting for each of the non-software
deliverables and to the software deliverables as a group using
the relative selling prices of each of the deliverables in the
arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy.
If the arrangement contains more than one software deliverable,
the arrangement consideration allocated to the software
deliverables as a group is then allocated to each software
deliverable using the guidance for recognizing software revenue,
as amended.
Business
Combinations
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied adopted
revised authoritative guidance on business combinations that
covers the measurement of acquirer shares issued as
consideration for a business combination, the recognition of
contingent consideration, the accounting for preacquisition gain
and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized
in-process research and development, the accounting for
acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment
of acquisition-related transaction costs, and the recognition of
changes in the acquirers income tax valuation allowance.
This authoritative guidance also revised the accounting for both
increases and decreases in a parents controlling ownership
interest.
|
|
Note 2
|
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share is determined using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share is determined using the weighted
average number of common shares and potential common shares
(representing the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted
stock units, and employee stock purchase plans shares)
outstanding during the period. Applieds net income (loss)
has not been adjusted for any period presented for purposes of
computing basic or diluted earnings (loss) per share due to the
Companys non-complex capital structure. For purposes of
computing diluted earnings per share, weighted average potential
common shares do not include stock options with an exercise
price greater than the average fair market value of Applied
common stock for the period as the effect would be
anti-dilutive. Potential common shares have not been included in
the calculation of diluted net loss per share for the three and
six months ended April 26,
7
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2009 as the effect would be anti-dilutive. As such, the
numerator and the denominator used in computing both basic and
diluted net loss per share for the three and six months ended
April 26, 2009 are the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
264,004
|
|
|
$
|
(255,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
346,755
|
|
|
$
|
(388,324
|
)
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
1,344,617
|
|
|
|
1,331,729
|
|
|
|
1,343,229
|
|
|
|
1,330,476
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options, restricted stock units and
employee stock purchase plans shares
|
|
|
7,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
1,352,436
|
|
|
|
1,331,729
|
|
|
|
1,350,802
|
|
|
|
1,330,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
Potentially dilutive securities
|
|
|
39,936,202
|
|
|
|
92,425,216
|
|
|
|
42,855,694
|
|
|
|
92,425,216
|
|
|
|
Note 3
|
Cash,
Cash Equivalents and Investments
|
Summary
of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments
The following tables summarizes Applieds cash, cash
equivalents and investments by security type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
May 2, 2010
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
692,580
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
692,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
875,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875,234
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
|
24,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24,998
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
3,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash equivalents
|
|
|
903,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
903,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash and Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,596,454
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
1,596,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and Long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
$
|
865,391
|
|
|
$
|
6,993
|
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
872,131
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
457,930
|
|
|
|
6,120
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
463,978
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
336,862
|
|
|
|
5,656
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
342,484
|
|
Other debt securities*
|
|
|
195,967
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
197,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
1,856,150
|
|
|
|
20,381
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
1,875,932
|
|
Publicly traded equity securities
|
|
|
9,572
|
|
|
|
14,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,303
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies
|
|
|
68,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-term and Long-term investments
|
|
$
|
1,934,134
|
|
|
$
|
35,112
|
|
|
$
|
599
|
|
|
$
|
1,968,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash, Cash equivalents and Investments
|
|
$
|
3,530,588
|
|
|
$
|
35,112
|
|
|
$
|
624
|
|
|
$
|
3,565,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
October 25, 2009
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
341,127
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
341,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash and Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,576,381
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,576,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and Long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
$
|
653,627
|
|
|
$
|
8,013
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
661,470
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
419,640
|
|
|
|
7,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,237
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
382,550
|
|
|
|
5,676
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
387,945
|
|
Other debt securities*
|
|
|
103,193
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
104,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
|
|
1,559,010
|
|
|
|
22,716
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
1,580,884
|
|
Publicly traded equity securities
|
|
|
9,572
|
|
|
|
9,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,011
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies
|
|
|
90,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-term and Long-term investments
|
|
$
|
1,659,201
|
|
|
$
|
32,155
|
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
$
|
1,690,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash, Cash equivalents and Investments
|
|
$
|
3,235,582
|
|
|
$
|
32,155
|
|
|
$
|
842
|
|
|
$
|
3,266,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Other debt securities consist primarily of investment grade
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities. |
Maturities
of Investments
The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of
Applieds investments at May 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
711,237
|
|
|
$
|
714,130
|
|
Due after one through five years
|
|
|
943,093
|
|
|
|
958,233
|
|
Due after five years
|
|
|
5,853
|
|
|
|
6,315
|
|
No single maturity date**
|
|
|
273,951
|
|
|
|
289,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,934,134
|
|
|
$
|
1,968,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Securities with no single maturity date include publicly-traded
and privately-held equity securities, and asset-backed and
mortgage-backed securities. |
9
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Gains
and Losses on Investments
Gross realized gains and losses on sales of investments during
the three and six months ended May 2, 2010 and
April 26, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$
|
1,545
|
|
|
$
|
1,551
|
|
|
$
|
1,887
|
|
|
$
|
4,805
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
3,164
|
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
|
$
|
8,977
|
|
At May 2, 2010, Applied had a gross unrealized loss of
$0.6 million due to a decrease in the fair value of certain
fixed income securities. Applied regularly reviews its
investment portfolio to identify and evaluate investments that
have indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in
determining whether an unrealized loss is temporary, or
other-than-temporary
and therefore impaired, include: the length of time and extent
to which fair value has been lower than the cost basis; the
financial condition, credit quality and near-term prospects of
the investee; and whether it is more likely than not that
Applied will be required to sell the security prior to recovery.
Generally, the contractual terms of investments in marketable
securities do not permit settlement at prices less than the
amortized cost of the investments. Applied has determined that
the gross unrealized losses on its marketable securities at
May 2, 2010, are temporary in nature and therefore it did
not recognize any impairment of its marketable securities for
the three and six months ended May 2, 2010. At May 2,
2010, Applied determined that certain of its equity investments
in privately-held companies were
other-than-temporarily
impaired and, accordingly, recognized impairment charges in the
amounts of $4 million and $5 million for the three and
six months ended May 2, 2010, respectively. Impairment
charges associated with financial assets for both the three and
six months ended April 26, 2009 totaled $77 million,
consisting of the following: equity method investment,
$45 million; publicly-traded equity securities,
$20 million; and equity investments in privately-held
companies, $12 million.
The following table provides the fair market value of
Applieds investments with unrealized losses that are not
deemed to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired as of May 2, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Loss Position for
|
|
|
In Loss Position for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
$
|
371,712
|
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
371,712
|
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
32,035
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,035
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
32,727
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,727
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
|
59,184
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
60,950
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
495,658
|
|
|
$
|
549
|
|
|
$
|
1,766
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
497,424
|
|
|
$
|
624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains and temporary losses on investments classified
as
available-for-sale
are included within accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), net of any related tax effect. Upon realization, those
amounts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) to results of operations.
10
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 4
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Applieds financial assets are measured and recorded at
fair value, except for equity investments held in privately-held
companies. These equity investments are generally accounted for
under the cost method of accounting and are periodically
assessed for
other-than-temporary
impairment when events or circumstances indicates that an
other-than-temporary
decline in value may have occurred. Applieds nonfinancial
assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant
and equipment, are recorded at cost and are assessed for
impairment when an event or circumstance indicates that an
other-than-temporary
decline in value may have occurred.
Fair
Value Hierarchy
Applied uses the following fair value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure
fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within
the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available
and significant to the fair value measurement:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly,
such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted
prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported
by little or no market activity and that are significant to the
fair value of the assets or liabilities.
|
Applieds investments are comprised primarily of debt
securities that are classified as
available-for-sale
and recorded at their fair value. In determining the fair value
of investments, Applied uses pricing information from pricing
services that value securities based on quoted market prices and
models that utilize observable market inputs. In the event a
fair value estimate is unavailable from a pricing service,
Applied generally obtains non-binding price quotes from brokers.
Applied then reviews the information provided by the pricing
services or brokers to determine the fair value of its
short-term and long-term investments. In addition, to validate
pricing information obtained from pricing services, Applied
periodically performs supplemental analysis on a sample of
securities. Applied reviews any significant unanticipated
differences identified through this analysis to determine the
appropriate fair value.
Investments with remaining effective maturities of
12 months or less from the balance sheet date are
classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining
effective maturities of more than 12 months from the
balance sheet date are classified as long-term investments. As
of May 2, 2010, substantially all of Applieds
available-for-sale,
short-term and long-term investments were recognized at fair
value that was determined based upon observable inputs.
11
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
Financial assets and liabilities (excluding cash balances)
measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below
as of May 2, 2010 and October 25, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
875,234
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
875,234
|
|
|
$
|
1,235,254
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,235,254
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
|
178,727
|
|
|
|
718,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897,129
|
|
|
|
145,166
|
|
|
|
516,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661,470
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427,237
|
|
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387,945
|
|
Other debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,232
|
|
Publicly traded equity securities
|
|
|
24,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,303
|
|
|
|
19,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,011
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,078,264
|
|
|
$
|
1,729,054
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,807,318
|
|
|
$
|
1,399,431
|
|
|
$
|
1,437,891
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,837,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no significant transfers in and out of Level 1
and Level 2 fair value measurements during the three and
six months ended May 2, 2010. During the three and six
months ended April 26 2009, Level 3 assets consisted of
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, the values of which
were based on non-binding, broker-provided price quotes and may
not have been corroborated by observable market data. The
following table presents the activity in Level 3
instruments during the periods indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2010
|
|
|
April 26, 2009
|
|
|
May 2, 2010
|
|
|
April 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,100
|
|
Total realized and unrealized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,766
|
)
|
Included in other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,125
|
)
|
Purchases, sales, and maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,995
|
)
|
Transfers out of Level 3, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,285
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring
Basis
Equity investments in privately-held companies are generally
accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are
periodically assessed for
other-than-temporary
impairment when an event or circumstance indicates that an
other-than-temporary
decline in value may have occurred. If Applied determines that
an
other-than-temporary
impairment has occurred, the investment will be written down to
its estimated fair value based on available information, such as
pricing in recent rounds of financing, current cash positions,
earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance
and any other readily available market data. Equity investments
in privately-held companies totaled $68 million at
May 2, 2010, of which $52 million of investments were
accounted for under the cost method of accounting and
$16 million of investments had been measured at fair value
on a non-recurring basis due to an
other-than-temporary
decline in value. At April 26, 2009, equity investments in
privately-held companies totaled $88 million, of which
$47 million of investments were accounted for under the
cost method of accounting and $41 million of investments
had been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis due to
an
other-than-temporary
decline in value.
The following tables present the balances of equity securities
at May 2, 2010 and April 26, 2009 that had been
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, using the
process described above, and the impairment charges recorded
during the three and six months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Impairment
|
|
|
Total Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis during fiscal 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,499
|
|
|
$
|
3,671
|
|
|
$
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Equity investments in privately-held companies measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis during fiscal 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,334
|
|
|
$
|
12,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
The carrying amounts of Applieds financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes
payable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate
fair value due to the short maturities of these financial
instruments. At May 2, 2010, the carrying amount of
long-term debt was $207 million and the estimated fair
value was $233 million. At October 25, 2009, the
carrying amount of long-term debt was $202 million and the
estimated fair value was $216 million. The estimated fair
value of long-term debt is determined by Level 2 inputs and
is based primarily on quoted market prices for the same or
similar issues.
|
|
Note 5
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Derivative instruments and hedging activities, including foreign
currency exchange contracts, are recognized on the balance sheet
at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do
not qualify for hedge treatment, as
13
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
well as the ineffective portion of any hedges, are recognized
currently in earnings. All of Applieds derivative
financial instruments are recorded at their fair value in other
current assets or accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Applied conducts business in a number of foreign countries, with
certain transactions denominated in local currencies, such as
Japanese yen, euro, Israeli shekel and Swiss franc. The purpose
of Applieds foreign currency management is to mitigate the
effect of exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency
denominated revenues, costs and eventual cash flows. The terms
of currency instruments used for hedging purposes are generally
consistent with the timing of the transactions being hedged.
Applied does not use derivative financial instruments for
trading or speculative purposes.
Applied uses derivative financial instruments, such as forward
exchange contracts and currency option contracts, to hedge
certain forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions
expected to occur typically within the next 24 months.
Hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and
documented at the inception of the hedge as cash flow hedges and
are typically entered into once per month. Cash flow hedges are
evaluated for effectiveness quarterly. The effective portion of
the gain or loss on these hedges is reported as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (AOCI) in
stockholders equity and is reclassified into earnings when
the hedged transaction affects earnings. The majority of the
after-tax net income or loss related to derivative instruments
included in AOCI at May 2, 2010 is expected to be
reclassified into earnings within 12 months. Changes in the
fair value of currency forward exchange and option contracts due
to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of
effectiveness. Both ineffective hedge amounts and hedge
components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are
recognized promptly in earnings. If the transaction being hedged
is no longer probable to occur, or if a portion of any
derivative is deemed to be ineffective, Applied promptly
recognizes the gain or loss on the associated financial
instrument in general and administrative expenses. The amount
recognized due to discontinuance of cash flow hedges that were
probable not to occur by the end of the originally specified
time period was not significant for the three and six months
ended May 2, 2010. The amount recognized due to
discontinuance of cash flow hedges that were probable not to
occur by the end of the originally specified time period was
$26 million and $25 million for the three and six
months ended April 26, 2009, respectively.
Forward exchange contracts are generally used to hedge certain
foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. These
derivatives are typically entered into once per month and are
not designated for hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly,
changes in the fair value of these hedges are recorded promptly
in earnings to offset the changes in the fair value of the
assets or liabilities being hedged.
Fair values of derivative instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current
assets
|
|
$
|
2,457
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current
assets
|
|
$
|
777
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,234
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as
Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current
assets
|
|
$
|
1,811
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current
assets
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated
Condensed Statement of Operations for the three and six months
ended May 2, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended May 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion and Amount
|
|
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Excluded from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
1,228
|
|
|
Cost of
products sold
|
|
$
|
590
|
|
|
Cost of
products sold
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
(2,124
|
)
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research,
development and
engineering
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
Research,
development and
engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended May 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(1,607
|
)
|
|
Cost of
products sold
|
|
$
|
(1,167
|
)
|
|
Cost of
products sold
|
|
$
|
(299
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
(1,087
|
)
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research,
development and
engineering
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
Research,
development and
engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(1,607
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended May 2, 2010
|
|
|
Ended May 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Amount of Gain
|
|
|
Amount of Gain
|
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
in Income
|
|
in Income
|
|
|
in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
$
|
6,780
|
|
|
$
|
(3,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,780
|
|
|
$
|
(3,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated
Condensed Statement of Operations for the three and six months
ended April 26, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
3,403
|
|
|
Cost of products
sold
|
|
$
|
2,609
|
|
|
Cost of products
sold
|
|
$
|
(638
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
(5,989
|
)
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
25,743
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research,
development and
engineering
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
Research,
development and
engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended April 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
Effective Portion
|
|
|
Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
|
|
|
Effectiveness Testing
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
Reclassified from
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
|
AOCI
|
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
AOCI into Income
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging
Relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(8,120
|
)
|
|
Cost of products
sold
|
|
$
|
(8,901
|
)
|
|
Cost of products
sold
|
|
$
|
(2,858
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
(12,204
|
)
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
24,242
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research,
development and
engineering
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
Research,
development and
engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(8,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 26, 2009
|
|
|
April 26, 2009
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Amount of Gain
|
|
|
Amount of Gain
|
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
|
or (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
in Income
|
|
in Income
|
|
|
in Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
$
|
19,764
|
|
|
$
|
(9,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,764
|
|
|
$
|
(9,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Risk Contingent Features
If Applieds credit rating were to fall below investment
grade, it would be in violation of credit risk contingent
provisions of the derivative instruments discussed above, and
certain counterparties to the derivative instruments could
request immediate payment on derivative instruments in net
liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative
instruments with credit-risk related contingent features that
were in a liability position was immaterial as of May 2,
2010.
Entering into foreign exchange contracts with banks exposes
Applied to credit-related losses in the event of the banks
nonperformance. However, Applieds exposure is not
considered significant.
|
|
Note 6
|
Accounts
Receivable, Net
|
Applied has agreements with various financial institutions to
sell accounts receivable and discount promissory notes from
selected customers. Applied also discounts letters of credit
through various financial institutions. Applied sells its
accounts receivable without recourse. Details of discounted
letters of credit, factored accounts receivable and discounted
promissory notes for the three and six months ended May 2,
2010 and April 26, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Discounted letters of credit
|
|
$
|
26,049
|
|
|
$
|
39,419
|
|
|
$
|
53,262
|
|
|
$
|
52,700
|
|
Factored accounts receivable
|
|
|
23,594
|
|
|
|
19,709
|
|
|
|
48,691
|
|
|
|
21,884
|
|
Discounted promissory notes
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
50,435
|
|
|
$
|
60,025
|
|
|
$
|
103,050
|
|
|
$
|
76,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing charges on the sale of receivables and discounting of
letters of credit are included in interest expense in the
accompanying Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and
were not material for all periods presented.
Accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $73 million at May 2, 2010 and
$67 million at October 25, 2009. Applied sells
principally to manufacturers within the semiconductor, display
and solar industries. As a result of challenging economic and
industry conditions, certain of these manufacturers may
experience difficulties in meeting their obligations in a timely
manner. While Applied believes that its allowance for doubtful
accounts is adequate and represents Applieds best estimate
at May 2, 2010, Applied will continue to closely monitor
customer liquidity and other economic conditions, which may
result in changes to Applieds estimates regarding
collectability.
17
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 7
|
Balance
Sheet Detail
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Customer service spares
|
|
$
|
291,459
|
|
|
$
|
263,688
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
301,633
|
|
|
|
351,824
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
670,628
|
|
|
|
667,484
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
426,725
|
|
|
|
344,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,690,445
|
|
|
$
|
1,627,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost
determined on a FIFO basis. Included in finished goods inventory
is $133 million at May 2, 2010, and $133 million
at October 25, 2009, of newly-introduced systems at
customer locations where the sales transaction did not meet
Applieds revenue recognition criteria as set forth in
Note 1.
Applied adjusts inventory carrying value for estimated
obsolescence equal to the difference between the cost of
inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions
about future demand and market conditions. Applied fully
reserves for inventories and noncancelable purchase orders for
inventory deemed obsolete. Applied performs periodic reviews of
inventory items to identify excess inventories on hand by
comparing on-hand balances to anticipated usage using recent
historical activity as well as anticipated or forecasted demand.
If estimates of customer demand diminish further or market
conditions become less favorable than those projected by
Applied, additional inventory adjustments may be required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$
|
229,322
|
|
|
$
|
228,057
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
1,237,881
|
|
|
|
1,164,384
|
|
Demonstration and manufacturing equipment
|
|
|
686,957
|
|
|
|
654,779
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment
|
|
|
723,268
|
|
|
|
713,505
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
59,843
|
|
|
|
146,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
2,937,271
|
|
|
|
2,906,957
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,853,746
|
)
|
|
|
(1,816,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,083,525
|
|
|
$
|
1,090,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
546,359
|
|
|
$
|
477,148
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
310,052
|
|
|
|
134,949
|
|
Warranty
|
|
|
140,369
|
|
|
|
117,537
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
94,009
|
|
|
|
80,455
|
|
Other accrued taxes
|
|
|
65,191
|
|
|
|
36,954
|
|
Restructuring reserve
|
|
|
93,590
|
|
|
|
31,581
|
|
Other
|
|
|
190,655
|
|
|
|
182,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,440,225
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Deposits and Deferred Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
$
|
578,020
|
|
|
$
|
564,412
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
402,638
|
|
|
|
299,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
980,658
|
|
|
$
|
864,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 8
|
Goodwill,
Purchased Technology and Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill
and Purchased Intangible Assets
Applieds methodology for allocating the purchase price
relating to purchase acquisitions is determined through
established and generally accepted valuation techniques.
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of the
acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities
assumed. Applied assigns assets acquired (including goodwill)
and liabilities assumed to a reporting unit as of the date of
acquisition. Typically, acquisitions relate to a single
reporting unit and thus do not require the allocation of
goodwill to multiple reporting units. If the products obtained
in an acquisition are assigned to multiple reporting units, the
goodwill is distributed to the respective reporting units as
part of the purchase price allocation process.
Goodwill and purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment
annually during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. The process
of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill and
intangible assets requires significant judgment, especially in
emerging markets. Applied regularly monitors current business
conditions and other factors including, but not limited to,
adverse industry or economic trends, restructuring actions and
lower projections of profitability that may impact future
operating results. For goodwill, Applied performs a two-step
impairment test. In the first step, Applied compares the
estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying
value. Applieds reporting units are consistent with the
reportable segments identified in Note 15, based on the
manner in which Applied operates its business and the nature of
those operations. Applied determines the fair value of each of
its reporting units based on a weighting of income and market
approaches. Under the income approach, Applied calculates the
fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of
estimated future cash flows. Estimated future cash flows will be
impacted by a number of factors including anticipated future
operating results, estimated cost of capital
and/or
discount rates. Under the market approach, Applied estimates the
fair value based on market multiples of revenue or earnings for
comparable companies. If the fair value of the reporting unit
exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that
unit, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is
performed. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to
the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit,
then Applied would perform the second step of the impairment
test in order to determine the implied fair value of the
reporting units goodwill. Applied would then allocate the
fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and
liabilities of that unit, as if Applied had acquired the
reporting unit in a business combination, with the fair value of
the reporting unit being the purchase price. The
excess of the purchase price over the carrying
amounts assigned to assets and liabilities represents the
implied fair value of goodwill. If Applied determined that the
carrying value of a reporting units goodwill exceeded its
implied fair value, Applied would record an impairment equal to
the difference.
Applied conducted impairment tests in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009, and the results of the first step of the impairment
test indicated that Applieds goodwill and purchased
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives for each of its
reporting units were not impaired. During the second quarter of
fiscal 2010, Applied tested goodwill of the Energy and
Environmental Solutions reporting unit for potential impairment
and the result of the first step of the impairment test
indicated that there was no impairment. Applied tested goodwill
of the Energy and Environmental Solutions reporting unit for
impairment in light of second quarter developments that included
the insolvency of a thin film solar customer, inability of other
thin film solar customers to secure financing, weaker outlooks
for certain customers that in turn reduced their spending plans
resulting in the delay or cancellation of thin film production
lines, and other adverse operating conditions affecting the
solar industry.
Applied utilized the discounted cash flow method of the income
approach to estimate the fair value of the Energy and
Environmental Solutions reporting unit. Although considered, the
market approach was not used as comparable enterprises,
market-based growth rates, and gross margins were not considered
to be representative of the Energy and Environmental Solutions
reporting unit. While the results of the first step of the
impairment test indicated that goodwill and intangible assets
within the Energy and Environmental Solutions reporting unit
were not
19
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
impaired, the estimated fair value in excess of carrying value
declined significantly from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 to
the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to approximately
$200 million (or 19 percent over the carrying value of
the reporting unit). The estimates used in the impairment
testing were consistent with the discrete forecasts that Applied
uses to manage its business, and considered the significant
developments that occurred during the quarter. Cash flows beyond
the discrete forecasts were estimated using a terminal value
rate, which considered the long-term earnings growth rate
specific to the Energy and Environmental Solutions reporting
unit. The estimated future cash flows were discounted to present
value using a discount rate that was the value-weighted average
of Applieds estimated cost of equity and debt derived
using both known and estimated market metrics, and was adjusted
to reflect risk factors that considered both the timing and
risks associated with the estimated cash flows. In the event of
future adverse business conditions in the market in which the
Energy and Environmental Solutions reporting unit operates,
Applied will reassess and update its forecasts and estimates
used in a future impairment analysis. If the results of this
analysis are lower than current estimates, a material impairment
charge may result at that time.
Details of indefinite-lived intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
$
|
1,336,426
|
|
|
$
|
17,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,353,826
|
|
|
$
|
1,170,932
|
|
|
$
|
17,860
|
|
|
$
|
1,188,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From October 25, 2009 to May 2, 2010, goodwill
increased by $158 million due to the acquisition of
Semitool, Inc. (Semitool), and by $7 million due to an
asset purchase from Advent Solar, Inc. (Advent Solar), both
during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 (see Note 16).
Other intangible assets that are not subject to amortization
consist primarily of a trade name. As of May 2, 2010,
indefinite-lived intangible assets by reportable segment were:
Energy and Environmental Solutions, $661 million; Silicon,
$382 million; Applied Global Services, $195 million;
and Display, $116 million.
Finite-Lived
Purchased Intangible Assets
Applied amortizes purchased intangible assets with finite lives
using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives
of the assets, ranging from 1 to 15 years.
Applied evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value
of an asset group may not be recoverable. Applied assesses the
fair value of the assets based on the amount of the undiscounted
future cash flow that the assets are expected to generate and
recognizes an impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future
cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset, plus net
proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are
less than the carrying value of the asset. When Applied
identifies an impairment, Applied reduces the carrying value of
the group of assets to comparable market values, when available
and appropriate, or to its estimated fair value based on a
discounted cash flow approach.
Intangible assets, such as purchased technology, are generally
recorded in connection with a business acquisition. The value
assigned to intangible assets is usually based on estimates and
judgments regarding expectations for the success and life cycle
of products and technology acquired. Applied evaluates the
useful lives of its intangible assets each reporting period to
determine whether events and circumstances require revising the
remaining period of amortization. In addition, Applied reviews
intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be
recoverable. Management considers such indicators as significant
differences in actual product acceptance from the estimates,
changes in the competitive and economic environment,
technological advances, and changes in cost structure.
20
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Details of amortized intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2, 2010
|
|
|
October 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
$
|
612,980
|
|
|
$
|
350,929
|
|
|
$
|
963,909
|
|
|
$
|
554,920
|
|
|
$
|
329,629
|
|
|
$
|
884,549
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(412,593
|
)
|
|
|
(222,488
|
)
|
|
|
(635,081
|
)
|
|
|
(400,093
|
)
|
|
|
(195,900
|
)
|
|
|
(595,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
200,387
|
|
|
$
|
128,441
|
|
|
$
|
328,828
|
|
|
$
|
154,827
|
|
|
$
|
133,729
|
|
|
$
|
288,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From October 25, 2009 to May 2, 2010, the change in
gross carrying amount of the amortized intangible assets was
approximately $79 million, primarily due to the acquisition
of Semitool during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Aggregate
amortization expense was $28 million and $23 million
for the three months ended May 2, 2010 and April 26,
2009, respectively, and $53 million and $44 million
for the six months ended May 2, 2010 and April 26,
2009, respectively. As of May 2, 2010, future estimated
amortization expense is expected to be $33 million for the
remainder of fiscal 2010, $61 million for fiscal 2011,
$57 million for fiscal 2012, $53 million for fiscal
2013, $49 million for fiscal 2014, and $76 million
thereafter. As of May 2, 2010, amortized intangible assets
by reportable segment were: Energy and Environmental Solutions,
$184 million; Silicon, $87 million; Applied Global
Services, $33 million; and Display, $25 million.
|
|
Note 9
|
Warranty,
Guarantees and Contingencies
|
Warranty
Changes in the warranty reserves during the three and six months
ended May 2, 2010 and April 26, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
137,430
|
|
|
$
|
143,723
|
|
|
$
|
117,537
|
|
|
$
|
142,846
|
|
Provisions for warranty
|
|
|
31,471
|
|
|
|
22,174
|
|
|
|
65,946
|
|
|
|
45,720
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(28,532
|
)
|
|
|
(34,026
|
)
|
|
|
(43,114
|
)
|
|
|
(56,695
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
140,369
|
|
|
$
|
131,871
|
|
|
$
|
140,369
|
|
|
$
|
131,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applied products are generally sold with a
12-month
warranty period following installation. The provision for the
estimated cost of warranty is recorded when revenue is
recognized. Parts and labor are covered under the terms of the
warranty agreement. The warranty provision is based on
historical experience by product, configuration and geographic
region. Quarterly warranty consumption is generally associated
with sales that occurred during the preceding four quarters, and
quarterly warranty provisions are generally related to the
current quarters sales.
Guarantees
During the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby
letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to certain
parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either
Applied or its subsidiaries. As of May 2, 2010, the maximum
potential amount of future payments that Applied could be
required to make under these guarantee arrangements was
$88 million. Applied has not recorded any liability in
connection with these guarantee arrangements beyond that
required to account for the underlying transaction being
guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on historical
experience and information currently available, that it is
probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under
these guarantee arrangements.
21
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Applied also has agreements with various global banks to
facilitate subsidiary banking operations world-wide, including
overdraft arrangements, bank guarantees and letters of credit.
As of May 2, 2010, Applied Materials, Inc. has provided
parent guarantees to banks for approximately $173 million
to cover these arrangements.
Legal
matters
Semitool
Shareholder Litigation
On November 17, 2009, Applied announced that it was making
a tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of
Semitool in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger
entered into with Semitool. Following this announcement, three
lawsuits were filed by Semitool shareholders in the District
Court of the Eleventh Judicial District Court for the State of
Montana, County of Flathead, against Semitool, Semitools
directors, Applied and Applieds acquisition subsidiary.
The actions seek certification of a class of all holders of
Semitool common stock, except the defendants and their
affiliates. The complaints allege that Semitools directors
breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, failing
to maximize shareholder value and failing to disclose material
information, and that Applied aided and abetted such alleged
breaches. The actions seek injunctive relief, damages and
attorneys fees.
On December 14, 2009, all parties in these cases reached an
agreement in principle to settle the matters and the plaintiffs
withdrew their motion to enjoin consummation of the transaction.
Without admitting any wrongdoing or fault, Semitool disclosed
certain additional information in its
Schedule 14D-9
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 14, 2009. Following the tender of shares
representing over 95 percent of the outstanding shares of
Semitool common stock, the merger of Semitool into
Applieds acquisition subsidiary was completed on
December 21, 2009. Pursuant to a memorandum of
understanding between the parties, plaintiffs are conducting
discovery to confirm the fairness and reasonableness of the
settlement, and defendants will not object to an application by
plaintiffs counsel for an award of attorneys fees
and expenses in an amount up to $200,000. A class of
Semitools public shareholders will be certified solely for
purposes of settlement, which, if approved by the Court, will
result in a complete and final discharge of all claims on behalf
of the class.
Jusung
Applied has been engaged in several lawsuits and patent and
administrative proceedings in Taiwan and South Korea since 2003,
and more recently in China, with Jusung Engineering Co., Ltd.
(Jusung Engineering)
and/or
Jusung Pacific Co., Ltd. (Jusung Pacific, referred to together
with Jusung Engineering as Jusung) involving technology used in
manufacturing LCDs. Applied believes that it has meritorious
claims and defenses against Jusung that it intends to pursue
vigorously.
In 2004, Applied filed a complaint for patent infringement
against Jusung in the Hsinchu District Court in Taiwan seeking
damages and a permanent injunction for infringement of a patent
related to chemical vapor deposition (CVD) equipment, and
this case remains pending. Jusung Pacific unsuccessfully sought
invalidation of Applieds CVD patent in the Taiwanese
Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). Jusung Pacifics
initial appeal of the TIPOs decision was denied, and it
has filed a further appeal to the Taipei High Supreme
Administrative Court. In 2009, Jusung filed a second action with
the TIPO seeking invalidation of Applieds CVD patent.
In 2006, Applied filed an action in the TIPO challenging the
validity of a patent owned by Jusung Engineering related to
severability of the transfer chamber on a CVD tool. Jusung
Engineering sued Applied and AKT America in Hsinchu District
Court in Taiwan alleging infringement of the same patent. The
TIPO granted Applieds request for invalidation and revoked
Jusung Engineerings patent. In March 2009, the Hsinchu
District Court dismissed Jusung Engineerings lawsuit, and
in April 2009, the Ministry of Economic Affairs overruled Jusung
Engineerings administrative appeal of the decision
revoking its patent. On January 7, 2010, the Taiwan
Intellectual Property Court granted Jusungs appeal of the
decision revoking its patent and remanded the matter to the TIPO
for reconsideration
22
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
of validity. In November 2009, Applied filed an action in China
with the Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual
Property Office seeking to invalidate this patent.
In 2006, Jusung Engineering filed a complaint of private
prosecution in the Taipei District Court of Taiwan alleging that
Applieds outside counsel received from the Court and used
a copy of an expert report that Jusung had filed in the ongoing
patent infringement lawsuits that Jusung had intended to remain
confidential. The complaint names as defendants Applieds
outside counsel in Taiwan, as well as Michael R. Splinter,
Applieds Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
as the statutory representative of Applied. The Taipei District
Court dismissed the private prosecution complaint, and the
matter was transferred to the Taipei District Attorneys
Office. The Taipei District Attorneys Office has issued
four successive rulings not to prosecute, each of which Jusung
Engineering has appealed. In each instance, the Taiwan High
Court District Attorney has returned the matter to the Taipei
District Attorneys Office for further consideration, where
it remains pending.
Korea
Criminal Proceedings
In February 2010, the Seoul Prosecutors Office for the
Eastern District of Korea (the Prosecutors Office)
indicted employees of several companies for the alleged improper
receipt and use of confidential information belonging to a major
Applied customer based in Korea. The Prosecutors Office
did not name Applied or any of its subsidiaries as a party to
the criminal action. The individuals charged included the former
head of Applied Materials Korea (AMK), who at the time of the
indictment was a vice president of Applied Materials, Inc., and
certain other AMK employees. Hearings on these matters are
ongoing in the Seoul Eastern District Court. There is a risk
that these matters may lead to other legal actions. Applied is
investigating the allegations and surrounding circumstances.
Applied currently is unable to determine what impact these
matters may have on Applieds business. The nature and
magnitude of the impact, if any, on Applieds business will
depend on many factors, including the outcome of the proceedings
and Applieds customer relationships.
From time to time, Applied receives notification from third
parties, including customers and suppliers, seeking
indemnification, litigation support, payment of money or other
actions by Applied in connection with claims made against them.
In addition, from time to time, Applied receives notification
from third parties claiming that Applied may be or is infringing
or misusing their intellectual property or other rights. Applied
also is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims,
both asserted and unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course
of business.
Although the outcome of the above-described matters or these
claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty,
Applied does not believe that any of these proceedings or other
claims will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
Note 10
|
Restructuring
and Asset Impairments
|
On November 11, 2009, Applied announced a restructuring
program to reduce its global workforce as of October 25,
2009 by approximately 1,300 to 1,500 positions, or 10 to
12 percent, over a period of 18 months. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied recorded restructuring
charges of $104 million associated with this program.
Changes in restructuring reserves related to the program
described above for the six months ended May 2, 2010 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Provision for restructuring reserves
|
|
$
|
103,780
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(16,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 31, 2010
|
|
|
87,092
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(6,710
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, May 2, 2010
|
|
$
|
80,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Changes in restructuring reserves for the six months ended
May 2, 2010 related to other restructuring plans and
facilities realignment programs initiated in prior periods were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, October 25, 2009
|
|
$
|
26,353
|
|
|
$
|
5,228
|
|
|
$
|
31,581
|
|
Provision for restructuring reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(11,915
|
)
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
(12,142
|
)
|
Foreign currency changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 31, 2010
|
|
|
14,438
|
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
19,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for restructuring reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Consumption of reserves
|
|
|
(6,167
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(6,196
|
)
|
Adjustment of restructuring reserves
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
Foreign currency changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, May 2, 2010
|
|
$
|
8,273
|
|
|
$
|
4,935
|
|
|
$
|
13,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied recorded an
asset impairment charge of $9 million to write down a
facility to its estimated fair value based on prices for
comparable local properties. The facility was reclassified as an
asset held for sale within other current assets.
|
|
Note 11
|
Stockholders
Equity, Comprehensive Income and Equity-Based
Compensation
|
Comprehensive
Income
Components of comprehensive income (loss), on an after-tax basis
where applicable, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
264,004
|
|
|
$
|
(255,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
346,755
|
|
|
$
|
(388,324
|
)
|
Pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain on investments
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
14,862
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
31,336
|
|
Change in unrealized net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
qualifying as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
|
(8,093
|
)
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
(8,303
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
(1,625
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
263,812
|
|
|
$
|
(247,414
|
)
|
|
$
|
347,732
|
|
|
$
|
(365,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, on an
after-tax basis where applicable, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Pension liability and post retirement benefits
|
|
$
|
(32,075
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,149
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on investments net
|
|
|
21,985
|
|
|
|
19,972
|
|
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments qualifying as cash
flow hedges
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments
|
|
|
8,562
|
|
|
|
10,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(703
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Repurchase Program
On March 8, 2010, Applieds Board of Directors
approved a new stock repurchase program authorizing up to
$2 billion in repurchases over the next three years ending
in March 2013. Under this authorization, Applied renewed its
systematic stock repurchase program and may also make
supplemental stock repurchases from time to time, depending on
market conditions, stock price and other factors. During the
three and six months ended May 2, 2010, Applied repurchased
7,631,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of
$13.10 per share for a total cash outlay of $100 million.
Applied did not repurchase any shares of its common stock during
the three months ended April 26, 2009. During the six
months ended April 26, 2009, Applied repurchased
1,942,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of
$11.80 per share for a total cash outlay of $23 million.
Dividends
On March 8, 2010, Applieds Board of Directors
approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend to $0.07 per
share, payable on June 16, 2010 to stockholders of record
as of May 26, 2010. In December 2009, Applieds Board
of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of
$0.06 per share that was paid on March 17, 2010 to
stockholders of record as of February 24, 2010. The
declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of
the Board of Directors and will depend on Applieds
financial condition, results of operations, capital
requirements, business conditions and other factors, as well as
a determination by the Board of Directors that cash dividends
are in the best interest of Applieds stockholders.
Equity-Based
Compensation
Applied has adopted stock plans that permit grants to employees
of equity-based awards, including stock options, restricted
stock and restricted stock units (also referred to as
performance shares under Applieds principal
equity compensation plan, the Employee Stock Incentive Plan). In
addition, the Employee Stock Incentive Plan provides for the
automatic grant of restricted stock units to non-employee
directors and permits the grant of equity-based awards to
consultants. Applied also has two Employee Stock Purchase Plans,
one for United States employees and a second for international
employees (collectively, ESPP), which enable eligible employees
to purchase Applied common stock.
During the three and six months ended May 2, 2010 and
April 26, 2009, Applied recognized equity-based
compensation expense related to stock options, ESPP shares,
restricted stock units and restricted stock. Total equity-based
compensation and related tax benefits were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Equity-based compensation
|
|
$
|
28,641
|
|
|
$
|
39,172
|
|
|
$
|
62,330
|
|
|
$
|
72,780
|
|
Tax benefit recognized
|
|
$
|
8,592
|
|
|
$
|
11,968
|
|
|
$
|
18,025
|
|
|
$
|
20,378
|
|
The cost associated with equity awards that are subject solely
to time-based vesting requirements, less expected forfeitures,
is recognized over the awards service period for the
entire award on a straight-line basis. The cost associated with
performance-based equity awards is recognized for each tranche
over the service period, based on an assessment of the
achievement of performance goals.
Stock
Options
The exercise price of each stock option equals the fair market
value of Applied common stock on the date of grant. Most options
are scheduled to vest over four years, subject to the
grantees continued service with Applied, and expire no
later than seven years from the grant date. The fair value of
each option is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. This model was developed for
use in estimating the value of
25
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
publicly traded options that have no vesting restrictions and
are fully transferable. Applieds employee stock options
have characteristics significantly different from those of
publicly traded options. The weighted average assumptions used
in the model are outlined in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Stock Options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
The computation of the expected volatility assumption used in
the Black-Scholes calculations for new grants is based on a
combination of historical and implied volatilities. When
establishing the expected life assumption, Applied periodically
reviews historical employee exercise behavior with respect to
option grants. There were no stock options granted in the three
and six months ended May 2, 2010. The weighted average
grant date fair value of options granted during the three and
six months ended April 26, 2009 was $2.52.
Stock option activity for the six months ended May 2, 2010
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 25, 2009
|
|
|
73,101
|
|
|
$
|
14.72
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(6,533
|
)
|
|
$
|
11.09
|
|
Canceled/forfeited
|
|
|
(5,805
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at May 2, 2010
|
|
|
60,763
|
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at May 2, 2010
|
|
|
46,197
|
|
|
$
|
17.06
|
|
Restricted
Stock Units and Restricted Stock
Restricted stock units are converted into shares of Applied
common stock upon vesting on a
one-for-one
basis. Restricted stock has the same rights as other issued and
outstanding shares of Applied common stock except these shares
have no right to dividends and are held in escrow until the
award vests. Restricted stock units and awards of restricted
stock typically vest over three to four years. Vesting of
restricted stock units and restricted stock usually is subject
to the grantees continued service with Applied and, in
some cases, achievement of specified performance goals. The
compensation expense related to these awards is determined using
the fair market value of Applied common stock on the date of the
grant, and the compensation expense is recognized over the
vesting period. At May 2, 2010, Applied had
$196 million total unrecognized compensation expense, net
of estimated forfeitures, related to restricted stock unit and
restricted stock grants, which will be recognized over a
weighted average period of 1.5 years. Beginning in fiscal
2007, Applied initiated a performance-based equity award program
for named executive officers and other key employees. Awards of
restricted stock units or restricted stock granted under this
program vest only if specific performance goals set by the Human
Resources and Compensation Committee of Applieds Board of
Directors (the Committee) are achieved and if the grantee
remains employed by Applied through the applicable vesting date.
The performance goals require the achievement of targeted
relative annual operating profit margin levels as compared to
Applieds peer companies in at least one of the four fiscal
years
26
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
beginning with the fiscal year of the grant. The fair value of
these performance-based awards is estimated using the fair
market value of Applied common stock on the date of the grant
and assumes that the specified performance goals will be
achieved. If achieved, these awards vest over a specified
remaining service period. If the performance goals are not met,
no compensation expense is recognized and any previously
recognized compensation expense is reversed. The expected cost
of each award is reflected over the service period and is
reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Committee approved the
grant of 1,775,000 performance-based restricted stock units and
50,000 performance-based shares of restricted stock under this
program in the six months ended May 2, 2010. There were no
performance-based awards granted in the six months ended
April 26, 2009. With respect to the performance-based
awards granted in fiscal 2008, as of May 2, 2010,
70 percent of the performance goals associated with these
awards had been achieved. The performance goals associated with
the remaining 30 percent may still be achieved during
fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011.
Restricted stock unit and restricted stock activity for the six
months ended May 2, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock units and restricted stock at
October 25, 2009
|
|
|
12,105
|
|
|
$
|
14.37
|
|
|
|
2.4 Years
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
11,993
|
|
|
$
|
12.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(1,120
|
)
|
|
$
|
17.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(878
|
)
|
|
$
|
16.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock units and restricted stock at
May 2, 2010
|
|
|
22,100
|
|
|
$
|
13.10
|
|
|
|
2.9 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
Stock Purchase Plans
Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase Applied
common stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to
85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of Applied
common stock at the beginning or end of each
6-month
purchase period, for an aggregate price of up to $6,500 per
purchase period per employee. Based on the Black-Scholes option
pricing model, the weighted average estimated fair value of
purchase rights under the ESPP was $3.00 and $2.99 for the three
and six months ended May 2, 2010 and April 26, 2009,
respectively. The number of shares issued under the ESPP during
the three and six months ended May 2, 2010 and
April 26, 2009 was 2,440,000 and 3,536,000, respectively.
Compensation expense is calculated using the fair value of the
employees purchase rights under the Black-Scholes model.
Underlying assumptions used in the model are outlined in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ESPP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
27
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 12
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Applied sponsors a number of employee benefit plans, including
defined benefit plans of certain foreign subsidiaries, and a
plan that provides certain health benefits to eligible retirees.
A summary of the components of net periodic benefit costs of
these defined and postretirement benefit plans for the three and
six months ended May 2, 2010 and April 26, 2009 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
3,350
|
|
|
$
|
3,290
|
|
|
$
|
6,700
|
|
|
$
|
6,580
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,444
|
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
6,888
|
|
|
|
6,014
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,913
|
)
|
|
|
(1,863
|
)
|
|
|
(3,826
|
)
|
|
|
(3,726
|
)
|
Amortization of actuarial loss
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
5,118
|
|
|
$
|
4,557
|
|
|
$
|
10,236
|
|
|
$
|
9,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13
|
Borrowing
Facilities
|
Applied has credit facilities for unsecured borrowings in
various currencies of up to $1.1 billion, of which
$1.0 billion is comprised of a
5-year
revolving credit agreement with a group of banks that is
scheduled to expire in January 2012. This agreement provides for
borrowings in United States dollars at interest rates keyed to
one of the two rates selected by Applied for each advance and
includes financial and other covenants with which Applied was in
compliance at May 2, 2010. Remaining credit facilities in
the amount of approximately $85 million are with Japanese
banks. Applieds ability to borrow under these facilities
is subject to bank approval at the time of the borrowing
request, and any advances will be at rates indexed to the
banks prime reference rate denominated in Japanese yen. No
amounts were outstanding under any of these facilities at
May 2, 2010.
Applieds effective income tax rate for the second quarter
of fiscal 2010 was a provision of 31.8 percent, and the
income tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 was a
benefit of 33.3 percent. Both periods included the impact
of restructuring charges. The income tax rate for the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 also included a tax benefit of
$9 million from the settlement of certain tax matters with
the state of California and a tax benefit of $12 million
relating to impairments of certain strategic investments.
Applieds future effective income tax rate depends on
various factors, such as tax legislation, the geographic
composition of Applieds pre-tax income, and the tax rate
on equity compensation. Management carefully monitors these
factors and timely adjusts the interim income tax rate
accordingly.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied received a
cash refund of approximately $130 million due to the
carryback of the fiscal year 2009 net operating loss to
fiscal year 2005.
During fiscal 2009, the Internal Revenue Service began an
examination of Applieds federal income tax returns for
fiscal years 2007 and 2006. Applied believes it has adequately
reserved for any income tax uncertainties that may arise as a
result of this examination.
A number of Applieds tax returns remain subject to
examination by taxing authorities. These include
U.S. federal returns for fiscal 2005 and later years,
California returns for fiscal 2006 and later years, tax returns
for certain states for fiscal 2002 and later years, and tax
returns in certain jurisdictions outside of the United States
for fiscal 2003 and later years.
28
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is
highly uncertain as well as the amounts and timing of various
tax payments that may be part of the settlement process. This
could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet
classification of current assets and non-current assets and
liabilities. The Company does not expect a material change in
unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months.
|
|
Note 15
|
Industry
Segment Operations
|
Applieds four reportable segments are: Silicon, Applied
Global Services, Display, and Energy and Environmental
Solutions. Applieds chief operating decision-maker has
been identified as the President and Chief Executive Officer,
who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating
resources and assessing performance for the entire Company.
Segment information is presented based upon Applieds
management organization structure as of May 2, 2010 and the
distinctive nature of each segment. Future changes to this
internal financial structure may result in changes to the
Companys reportable segments.
Each reportable segment is separately managed and has separate
financial results that are reviewed by Applieds chief
operating decision-maker. Each reportable segment contains
closely related products that are unique to the particular
segment. Segment operating income is determined based upon
internal performance measures used by Applieds chief
operating decision-maker.
Applied derives the segment results directly from its internal
management reporting system. The accounting policies Applied
uses to derive reportable segment results are substantially the
same as those used for external reporting purposes. Effective in
the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied changed its
methodology for allocating certain expenses to its reportable
segments. Applied has reclassified segment operating results for
the three and six months ended April 26, 2009 to conform to
the fiscal 2010 presentation. Management measures the
performance of each reportable segment based upon several
metrics including orders, net sales and operating income.
Management uses these results to evaluate the performance of,
and to assign resources to, each of the reportable segments.
Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments certain
operating expenses that it manages separately at the corporate
level, which include costs related to equity-based compensation
and certain corporate functions (certain management, finance,
legal, human resources, and research, development and
engineering), and unabsorbed information technology and
occupancy. In addition, Applied does not allocate to its
reportable segments restructuring and asset impairment charges
and any associated adjustments related to restructuring actions.
Segment operating income excludes interest income/expense and
other financial charges and income taxes according to how a
particular reportable segments management is measured.
Management does not consider the unallocated costs in measuring
the performance of the reportable segments.
The Silicon segment includes semiconductor capital equipment for
etch, rapid thermal processing, deposition, chemical mechanical
planarization, metrology and inspection, and wafer packaging.
The Applied Global Services segment includes technically
differentiated products and services to improve operating
efficiency, reduce operating costs and lessen the environmental
impact of semiconductor, display and solar customers
factories. Applied Global Services products consist of
spares, services, certain earlier generation products, and
remanufactured equipment. Customer demand for these products and
services is fulfilled through a global distribution system with
trained service engineers located in close proximity to customer
sites.
The Display segment encompasses products for manufacturing LCDs
for TVs, personal computers and other video-enabled devices. The
Display segment also includes the design and manufacture of
differentiated stand-alone equipment for the Applied SunFab thin
film line.
The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes products
for fabricating solar photovoltaic cells and modules, high
throughput
roll-to-roll
coating systems for flexible electronics and web products, and
systems used in the manufacture of energy-efficient glass.
29
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net sales and operating income (loss) for each reportable
segment for the three and six months ended May 2, 2010 and
April 26, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon
|
|
$
|
1,404,275
|
|
|
$
|
497,679
|
|
|
$
|
2,374,439
|
|
|
$
|
803,674
|
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
455,766
|
|
|
|
89,580
|
|
|
|
881,318
|
|
|
|
152,738
|
|
Display
|
|
|
269,502
|
|
|
|
89,867
|
|
|
|
401,610
|
|
|
|
114,794
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
165,997
|
|
|
|
(144,950
|
)
|
|
|
487,075
|
|
|
|
(181,217
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment
|
|
$
|
2,295,540
|
|
|
$
|
532,176
|
|
|
$
|
4,144,442
|
|
|
$
|
889,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon
|
|
$
|
260,231
|
|
|
$
|
(82,361
|
)
|
|
$
|
806,242
|
|
|
$
|
(36,122
|
)
|
Applied Global Services
|
|
|
319,315
|
|
|
|
(1,124
|
)
|
|
|
664,409
|
|
|
|
24,780
|
|
Display
|
|
|
83,526
|
|
|
|
(2,744
|
)
|
|
|
232,535
|
|
|
|
18,383
|
|
Energy and Environmental Solutions
|
|
|
357,005
|
|
|
|
(90,591
|
)
|
|
|
650,287
|
|
|
|
(154,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Segment
|
|
$
|
1,020,077
|
|
|
$
|
(176,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,353,473
|
|
|
$
|
(147,193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliations of total segment operating income to
Applieds consolidated operating income (loss) for the
three and six months ended May 2, 2010 and April 26,
2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total segment operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
532,176
|
|
|
$
|
(176,820
|
)
|
|
$
|
889,989
|
|
|
$
|
(147,193
|
)
|
Corporate and unallocated costs
|
|
|
(137,411
|
)
|
|
|
(89,754
|
)
|
|
|
(275,037
|
)
|
|
|
(182,701
|
)
|
Restructuring and asset impairment charges
|
|
|
(8,968
|
)
|
|
|
(26,709
|
)
|
|
|
(112,812
|
)
|
|
|
(159,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
385,797
|
|
|
$
|
(293,283
|
)
|
|
$
|
502,140
|
|
|
$
|
(489,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended May 2 2010, Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd. accounted for 18 percent of Applieds net sales
and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited accounted
for 14 percent. These two customers accounted for
30 percent of the accounts receivable balance as of
May 2, 2010.
|
|
Note 16
|
Business
Combinations
|
On December 21, 2009, Applied acquired Semitool, a public
company based in the state of Montana, for a purchase price of
$323 million in cash, net of cash acquired, pursuant to a
tender offer and subsequent short-form merger. The acquired
business is a leading supplier of electrochemical plating and
wafer surface preparation equipment used by semiconductor
packaging and manufacturing companies globally. Applieds
primary reasons for this acquisition were to complement its
existing product offerings and to provide opportunities for
future growth. The acquired business is included in results for
the Silicon segment.
In November 2009, Applied acquired substantially all the assets,
including the intellectual property, of Advent Solar, a
developer of advanced technology for crystalline silicon (c-Si)
solar photovoltaic cells and modules (PVs). This acquisition
complemented Applieds portfolio of solar PV technologies
and enhanced Applieds opportunities
30
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
in the c-Si equipment market. The acquisition is included in
results for the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment.
Applied allocated the purchase price of each of these
acquisitions to tangible assets, liabilities and identifiable
intangible assets acquired, based on their estimated fair
values. The excess of purchase price over the aggregate fair
values was recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to
identifiable intangible assets acquired was based on estimates
and assumptions made by management. These estimates were
determined through established and generally accepted
calculation techniques. Applied calculated the fair value of the
tangible and intangible assets acquired to allocate the purchase
prices at the respective acquisition dates. Based upon these
calculations, the purchase prices for the above acquisitions
were allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
Fair Market Values
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
38,744
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
37,961
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
61,838
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,837
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
45,578
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
165,495
|
|
Purchased intangible assets
|
|
|
93,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
446,829
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(46,246
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(25,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(71,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price allocated
|
|
$
|
375,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Developed technology
|
|
6-10
|
|
$
|
65,700
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
8
|
|
|
10,900
|
|
Trade names
|
|
3-10
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
Patents and trademarks
|
|
7-10
|
|
|
5,462
|
|
Backlog
|
|
1
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
Other
|
|
5
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
93,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 17
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In March 2010, the FASB issued updated authoritative guidance
that amends the requirements for evaluating whether a decision
maker or service provider has a variable interest, to clarify
that a quantitative approach should not be the sole
consideration in assessing the criteria for variable interest
entity determination. The guidance also clarifies that related
parties should be considered in applying all of the decision
maker and service provider criteria. This is in addition to the
authoritative guidance the FASB issued in June 2009 that applies
to determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity
and requiring an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine
whether the enterprises variable interest or interests
give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity. Under this
31
APPLIED
MATERIALS, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
guidance, an enterprise has such a controlling financial
interest when it has (1) the power to direct the activities
of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance and (2) the obligation
to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits
from the entity that could potentially be significant to the
variable interest entity. The guidance also requires an
enterprise to assess whether it has an implicit financial
responsibility to ensure that a variable interest entity
operates as designed when determining whether it has power to
direct the activities of the variable interest entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance. The
guidance also requires ongoing assessments of whether an
enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest
entity, requires enhanced disclosures and eliminates the scope
exclusion for qualifying special-purpose entities. This guidance
is effective for Applied beginning in the first quarter of
fiscal 2011. Applied is evaluating the potential impact of the
implementation of this authoritative guidance on its
consolidated financial statements.
In March 2010, the FASB ratified a consensus of the FASB
Emerging Issues Task Force that recognizes the milestone method
as an acceptable revenue recognition method for substantive
milestones in research or development arrangements. This
consensus would require its provisions be met in order for an
entity to recognize consideration that is contingent upon
achievement of a substantive milestone as revenue in its
entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. In
addition, this consensus would require disclosure of certain
information with respect to arrangements that contain
milestones. This authoritative guidance is effective for interim
and annual reporting periods on or after June 15, 2010 and
will be effective for Applied in the third quarter of fiscal
2010. Applied is evaluating the potential impact of the
implementation of this authoritative guidance on its
consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair
value measurements, which requires additional disclosures and
clarifications to existing disclosures. This authoritative
guidance requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the
amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and also to describe the
reasons for these transfers. This authoritative guidance also
requires enhanced disclosure of activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements. The new disclosures and clarifications of
existing disclosures for Level 1 and Level 2 fair
value measurements becomes effective the first interim reporting
period after December 15, 2009 and became effective for
Applied in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Disclosures
regarding activity within Level 3 fair value measurements
becomes effective the first interim reporting period after
December 15, 2010 and will be effective for Applied in the
second quarter of fiscal 2011. Applied is evaluating the
potential impact of the implementation of this authoritative
guidance on its consolidated financial statements. See
Note 4 for information and related disclosures regarding
Applieds fair value measurements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on variable
interest entities, which requires revised evaluations of whether
entities represent variable interest entities, ongoing
assessments of control over such entities, and additional
disclosures for variable interests. In December 2009, the FASB
issued authoritative guidance on the financial reporting by
entities involved with variable interest entities which amends
previously issued guidance on variable interest entities. The
amendments in this authoritative guidance replace the
quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining
which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused
on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct
the activities of a variable interest entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance and
(1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or
(2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. This
authoritative guidance becomes effective the first annual
reporting period after November 15, 2009 and will be
effective for Applied in fiscal 2011. Applied is evaluating the
potential impact of the implementation of this authoritative
guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
32
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
All statements in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and those made by the management of Applied, other than
statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements.
Examples of forward-looking statements include statements
regarding Applieds future financial or operating results,
cash flows and cash deployment strategies, declaration of
dividends, share repurchases, business strategies, projected
costs, products, competitive positions, managements plans
and objectives for future operations, research and development,
acquisitions and joint ventures, growth opportunities,
customers, working capital, liquidity, investment portfolio and
policies, and legal proceedings, as well as industry trends and
outlooks. These forward-looking statements are based on
managements estimates, projections and assumptions as of
the date hereof and include the assumptions that underlie such
statements. Forward-looking statements may contain words such as
may, will, should,
could, would, expect,
plan, anticipate, believe,
estimate, predict, potential
and continue, the negative of these terms, or other
comparable terminology. Any expectations based on these
forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties and other important factors, including those
discussed in Part II, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, below and elsewhere in this report. Other risks
and uncertainties may be disclosed in Applieds prior
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. These and many
other factors could affect Applieds future financial
condition and operating results and could cause actual results
to differ materially from expectations based on forward-looking
statements made in this document or elsewhere by Applied or on
its behalf. Applied undertakes no obligation to revise or update
any forward-looking statements.
Overview
Applied provides Nanomanufacturing
Technologytm
solutions for the global semiconductor, flat panel display,
solar and related industries, with a broad portfolio of
innovative equipment, service and software products.
Applieds customers are primarily manufacturers of
semiconductors, flat panel liquid crystal displays (LCDs), solar
photovoltaic cells and modules (solar PVs), flexible electronics
and energy-efficient glass. Applied operates in four reportable
segments: Silicon, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy
and Environmental Solutions. Product development and
manufacturing activities occur primarily in North America,
Europe, Israel and Asia. Applieds broad range of equipment
and service products are highly technical and are sold primarily
through a direct sales force.
Applieds results historically have been driven primarily
by worldwide demand for semiconductors, which in turn depends on
end-user demand for electronic products. Each of Applieds
businesses is subject to cyclical industry conditions, as demand
for manufacturing equipment and services can change depending on
supply and demand for chips, LCDs, solar PVs and other
electronic devices, as well as other factors, such as global
economic and market conditions, and technological advances in
fabrication processes. After a challenging year in fiscal 2009
that was characterized by credit constraints in the financial
markets, a weak global economy and a semiconductor industry
downturn, global economic and industry conditions generally
improved in the first half of fiscal 2010.
The following table presents certain significant measurements
for the three and six months ended May 2, 2010 and
April 26, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
|
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
2,533
|
|
|
$
|
649
|
|
|
|
290
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,498
|
|
|
$
|
1,552
|
|
|
|
190
|
%
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
2,296
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
125
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,144
|
|
|
$
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
Gross margin
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
|
494
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,638
|
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
|
|
199
|
%
|
Gross margin percent
|
|
|
40.4
|
%
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
25 points
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
16 points
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
232
|
%
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
$
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
%
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
203
|
%
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
$
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
189
|
%
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
205
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
190
|
%
|
33
Fiscal year 2010 is a 53-week year with 27 weeks in the
first six months, while fiscal 2009 was a 52-week year with
26 weeks in the first six months.
Financial results for the second quarter of fiscal 2010
reflected significantly increased demand for manufacturing
equipment and services due to more favorable global economic and
industry conditions compared to the second quarter of fiscal
2009. Total orders in the quarter increased
year-over-year,
primarily due to increased demand for most of Applieds
products, with the principal exception of SunFab thin film solar
manufacturing lines. Net sales and net income increased during
the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter
of fiscal 2009, led primarily by stronger sales of semiconductor
equipment.
Financial results for the first six months of fiscal 2010
similarly reflected significantly increased demand for
manufacturing equipment and services due to more favorable
global economic and industry conditions. Total orders increased
from the first six months of fiscal 2009, primarily due to
increased demand for semiconductor and display products,
partially offset by decreased demand for SunFab thin film solar
lines. Net sales increased during the first six months of fiscal
2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009, due
primarily to higher sales of semiconductor and display products.
Net income in both periods included restructuring charges.
Results
of Operations
New orders of $2.5 billion for the second quarter of fiscal
2010 increased significantly from second quarter of fiscal 2009
new orders of $1.6 billion. The increase was principally
due to an increase in demand for semiconductor equipment,
primarily from memory and foundry customers, as well as
increased demand for display equipment. New orders of
$4.5 billion for the first six months of fiscal 2010 were
up 190 percent from the first six months of fiscal 2009.
The increase in new orders was primarily attributable to a
higher demand for equipment and services from semiconductor
customers as well as increased demand for display equipment.
New orders by geographic region (determined by the location of
customers facilities) for the three and six months ended
May 2, 2010 and April 26, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
China
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
3,640
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
North America(*)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4,498
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Primarily the United States. |
Applieds backlog for the most recent three fiscal quarters
was as follows: $3.0 billion at May 2, 2010,
$2.9 billion at January 31, 2010, and
$2.7 billion at October 25, 2009. Backlog increased
2 percent for the second quarter of 2010 from the first
quarter of fiscal 2010, primarily due to an increase in new
orders in the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment.
Backlog consists of: (1) orders for which written
authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates
are within the next 12 months, or shipment has occurred but
revenue has not been recognized; (2) contractual service
revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next
12 months; and (3) orders for SunFab lines that are
anticipated to be recognized as revenue within the next
12 months. Applieds backlog at any particular time is
not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future
periods, due to the potential
34
for customer changes in delivery schedules or cancellation of
orders, and due to the majority of sales in the quarter in the
largest business having come from orders received and shipped in
the same quarter.
Net sales of $2.3 billion for the second quarter of fiscal
2010 more than doubled from the second quarter of fiscal 2009,
reflecting higher sales of equipment and services to
semiconductor equipment customers. Sales were also higher
year-over-year
to display customers. Net sales of $4.1 billion for the
first six months of fiscal 2010 increased 76 percent from
the first six months of fiscal 2009, due to higher sales of
semiconductor equipment.
Net sales by geographic region (determined by the location of
customers facilities) for the three and six months ended
May 2, 2010 and April 26, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
China
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Southeast Asia
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
3,199
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
North America(*)
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,296
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4,144
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Primarily the United States. |
Gross margin as a percentage of net sales was 40.4 percent
for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, up from 15.2 percent
for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. For the first six months
of fiscal 2010, gross margin as a percentage of net sales was
39.5 percent, up from 23.2 percent for the first six
months of fiscal 2009. The increases for both the three and six
months ended May 2, 2010 were principally attributable to
higher net sales, more favorable product mix, improved factory
utilization, and continued cost control measures, offset in part
by an inventory charge of $83 million related to thin film
solar manufacturing equipment. Gross margin during the second
quarter of each of fiscal 2010 and 2009 included $8 million
of equity-based compensation expense. Gross margin during the
first six months of fiscal 2010 and 2009 included
$13 million and $15 million of equity-based
compensation expense, respectively.
Operating expenses included expenses related to research,
development and engineering (RD&E), marketing and selling
(M&S), and general and administrative (G&A). Expenses
related to RD&E, M&S and G&A totaled
$532 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared
to $422 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Operating expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2010
reflected the cancellation of workforce shutdowns, the
elimination of temporary salary reductions, and the resumption
of variable compensation programs. Expenses related to
RD&E, M&S and G&A totaled $1.0 billion for
the first six months of fiscal 2010 compared to
$877 million for the first six months of fiscal 2009. The
first six months of fiscal 2010 included fewer shutdown days
than the first six months of fiscal 2010, an extra week,
elimination of temporary salary reductions, and the resumption
of variable compensation programs. Operating expenses for the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 included transaction and legal
costs related to the acquisition of Semitool, Inc. (Semitool)
and the Advent Solar, Inc. (Advent Solar) asset purchase.
Operating expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2010
included asset impairment charges of $9 million related to
a facility reclassified as held for sale. Operating expenses for
the second quarter of fiscal 2009 included asset impairment
charges of $15 million related to wafer cleaning equipment,
and restructuring charges of $12 million associated with a
program announced in November 2008. (See Note 10 of Notes
to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.)
35
Operating expenses for the first six months of fiscal 2010
included restructuring charges of $104 million associated
with a program announced in November 2009, and asset impairment
charges of $9 million related to a facility held for sale.
Operating expenses for the first six months of fiscal 2009
included restructuring charges of $145 million associated
with a restructuring program announced in November 2008, and
asset impairment charges of $15 million related to wafer
cleaning equipment.
During the three and six months ended May 2, 2010, Applied
recognized $4 million and $5 million, respectively, in
impairment charges associated with certain equity investments in
privately-held companies. During the second quarter of fiscal
2009, Applied recognized $77 million in impairment charges,
consisting of $45 million associated with its equity method
investment in Sokudo, a Japanese joint venture company, and
$32 million in impairment charges associated with certain
strategic investments.
Net interest income was $5 million for the second quarter
of fiscal 2010, down from $7 million for the second quarter
of fiscal 2009. Net interest income was $9 million for the
first six months of fiscal 2010, down from $16 million for
the first six months of fiscal 2009. Lower net interest income
for the three and six months ended May 2, 2010 was
primarily due to a decrease in interest rates.
Applieds effective income tax rate for the second quarter
of fiscal 2010 was a provision of 31.8 percent as compared
to a benefit of 33.3 percent for the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. Applieds effective income tax rate for the
first six months of fiscal 2010 was a provision of
31.4 percent as compared to a benefit of 33.7 percent
for the first six months of fiscal 2009. The income tax rate for
each of these periods included the effect of restructuring
charges as discrete items. Applieds future effective
income tax rate depends on various factors, such as tax
legislation, the geographic composition of Applieds
pre-tax income, and the tax rate on equity compensation.
Management carefully monitors these factors and timely adjusts
the interim income tax rate accordingly.
Segment
Information
Applied reports financial results in four segments: Silicon,
Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and Environmental
Solutions. A description of the products and services, as well
as financial data, for each reportable segment can be found in
Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial
Statements. Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments
certain operating expenses that it manages separately at the
corporate level. These unallocated costs include costs for
equity-based compensation and certain corporate functions
(certain management, finance, legal, human resources, and
RD&E), and unabsorbed information technology and occupancy.
In addition, Applied does not allocate to its reportable
segments restructuring and asset impairment charges and any
associated adjustments related to restructuring actions.
Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied changed
its methodology for allocating certain expenses to its
reportable segments. Applied has reclassified segment operating
results for the three and six months ended April 26, 2009
to conform to the fiscal 2010 presentation.
The results for each reportable segment are discussed below.
Silicon
Segment
The Silicon segment includes semiconductor capital equipment for
deposition, etch, rapid thermal processing, chemical mechanical
planarization, metrology and inspection, and wafer packaging.
Development efforts are focused on solving customers key
technical challenges, including transistor performance and
nanoscale patterning, and improving chip manufacturing
productivity to reduce costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
1,416
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
36
New orders increased significantly to $1.4 billion for the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, and also increased to $2.6 billion for the
first six months of fiscal 2010 compared to the first six months
of fiscal 2009. The increase in new orders for the three and six
months ended May 2, 2010 was primarily from memory and
foundry customers and reflected the general recovery in the
semiconductor equipment industry from the steep downturn
experienced in the first half of fiscal 2009. The majority of
fiscal 2010 new orders were for customers capacity
expansions, while fiscal 2009 orders were primarily for
customers technology investments.
Net sales increased significantly to $1.4 billion for the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. Net sales increased 195 percent to
$2.4 billion for the first six months of fiscal 2010 over
the first six months of fiscal 2009. The increase in net sales
for the three and six months ended May 2, 2010 was due to
increased investment by memory and foundry customers. Three
customers accounted for 57 percent of net sales in this
segment in the first six months of fiscal 2010. Over
65 percent of net sales in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 were for orders received and shipped within the quarter.
The book to bill ratio (new orders divided by net sales) was 1.0
for each of the second quarters of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009.
The book to bill ratio increased to 1.1 for the first six months
of fiscal 2010, reflecting increased demand, compared to 0.6 for
the first six months of fiscal 2009.
For the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Silicon segment
reported operating income of $498 million compared to an
operating loss of $82 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. For the first six months of fiscal 2010, the
segment reported operating income of $804 million compared
to an operating loss of $36 million for the first six
months of fiscal 2009. The increase in operating income for the
three and six months ended May 2, 2010 was due to
considerably higher revenue from semiconductor equipment sales
and reflected the general recovery in the semiconductor
equipment industry during the first half of fiscal 2010. Results
for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 included Semitool, which
was acquired by Applied during the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Applied
Global Services Segment
The Applied Global Services segment encompasses technically
differentiated products, including spares, services, certain
earlier generation equipment products, and remanufactured
equipment, to improve operating efficiency, reduce operating
costs, and lessen the environmental impact of semiconductor,
display and solar customers factories. Customer demand for
products and services is fulfilled through a global distribution
system with trained service engineers located in close proximity
to customer sites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
|
$
|
236
|
|
|
$
|
957
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
New orders more than doubled to $483 million for the second
quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal
2009, and increased 75 percent to $957 million for the
first six months of fiscal 2010 compared to the first six months
of fiscal 2009. The increase in orders for the three and six
months ended May 2, 2010 was due primarily to higher demand
for spare parts, reflecting customers higher factory
utilization rates as semiconductor industry conditions improved.
Net sales increased 43 percent to $456 million for the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2009. Net sales increased 33 percent to
$882 million for the first six months of fiscal 2010
compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009. The increase in
net sales for the three and six months ended May 2, 2010
was primarily due to higher sales of spare parts.
The book to bill ratio increased to 1.1 for the second quarter
of fiscal 2010 compared to 0.7 for the second quarter of fiscal
2009. The book to bill ratio increased to 1.1 for the first six
months of fiscal 2010 compared to 0.8 for the first six months
of fiscal 2009.
37
For the second quarter of fiscal 2010, the Applied Global
Services segment reported operating income of $90 million
compared to an operating loss of $1 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2009. Operating income increased significantly
to $153 million for the first six months of fiscal 2010
compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009. The increase in
operating income for the three and six months ended May 2,
2010 primarily reflected increased sales of spare parts.
Display
Segment
The Display segment encompasses products for manufacturing LCDs
for TVs, personal computers and other video-enabled devices. The
business is focused on expanding market share by differentiation
with larger-scale substrates, entry into new markets, and
development of products to enable cost reductions through
productivity and uniformity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
New orders increased to $256 million for the second quarter
of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009,
and also increased to $382 million for the first six months
of fiscal 2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009.
The increase in orders for the three and six months ended
May 2, 2010 reflected the general recovery in the LCD
market, as customers increased production levels in response to
strong demand for flat panel TVs and notebook computers.
Net sales increased to $270 million for the second quarter
of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Net sales increased 73 percent to $402 million for the
first six months of fiscal 2010 compared to the first six months
of fiscal 2009. The increase in net sales for the three and six
months ended May 2, 2010 reflected strong market demand for
LCD products during the first half of fiscal 2010. Five
customers accounted for 69 percent of net sales for the
Display segment in the first six months of fiscal 2010.
The book to bill ratio increased to 1.0 for the second quarter
of fiscal 2010 compared to 0.2 for the second quarter of fiscal
2009. The book to bill ratio increased to 1.0 for the first six
months of fiscal 2010 compared to 0.2 for the first six months
of fiscal 2009.
Operating income was $90 million for the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 compared to an operating loss of $3 million for
the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Operating income increased to
$115 million for the first six months of fiscal 2010
compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009. The increase in
operating income for the three and six months ended May 2,
2010 was due to a significant increase in net sales and more
favorable product mix.
Energy
and Environmental Solutions Segment
The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes products
for fabricating thin film and crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar
PVs, high throughput
roll-to-roll
coating systems for flexible electronics and web products, and
systems used in the manufacture of energy-efficient glass. This
business is focused on delivering solutions to generate and
conserve energy, with an emphasis on lowering the cost to
produce solar power by providing equipment to enhance
manufacturing scale and efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
May 2,
|
|
April 26,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
New orders
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
38
New orders more than doubled to $378 million for the second
quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal
2009. New orders increased 32 percent to $608 million
for the first six months of fiscal 2010 compared to the first
six months of fiscal 2009. The increase in orders for the three
and six months ended May 2, 2010 reflected increased demand
for c-Si products, particularly wafering and metallization
products, offset by diminished demand for SunFab thin film
manufacturing lines. The continued challenging credit
environment for solar manufacturers and uncertain market
conditions for thin film solar panels contributed to the severe
reduction in orders for SunFab lines in the first half of fiscal
2010.
Net sales decreased 54 percent to $166 million for the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, and decreased 25 percent to $487 million
for the first six months of fiscal 2010 compared to the first
six months of fiscal 2009. The decrease in net sales for the
three and six months ended May 2, 2010 reflected
significantly lower sales to SunFab customers during the first
half of fiscal 2010. Results for the three and six months ended
April 26, 2009 reflected two more SunFab line sign offs
than in the three and six months ended May 2, 2010, as well
as revenue from a performance bonus from one of the SunFab
factories in production.
The book to bill ratio increased to 2.3 for the second quarter
of fiscal 2010 compared to 0.4 for the second quarter of fiscal
2009. The book to bill ratio increased to 1.3 for the first six
months of fiscal 2010 compared to 0.7 for the first six months
of fiscal 2009.
The operating loss in the Energy and Environmental Solutions
segment increased 59 percent to $145 million for the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of
fiscal 2009, and rose 17 percent to $181 million for
the first six months of fiscal 2010 over the first six months of
fiscal 2009. The increase in operating loss for the three and
six months ended May 2, 2010 was primarily due to an
$83 million inventory charge related to thin film solar
manufacturing equipment and lower net sales to SunFab customers,
partially offset by cost control initiatives. In light of the
unfavorable conditions affecting the market for SunFab thin film
lines, Applied does not expect that the Energy and Environmental
Solutions segment will achieve its previously stated goal to
achieve breakeven operating results in fiscal 2010.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied tested
goodwill for potential impairment for the Energy and
Environmental Solutions reporting unit as a result of certain
developments. The results of the first step of the impairment
test indicated that goodwill of the Energy and Environmental
Solutions reporting unit was not impaired. Applied tested
goodwill of the Energy and Environmental Solutions reporting
unit for impairment in light of second quarter developments that
included the insolvency of one thin film line customer,
inability of other thin film customers to secure financing,
weaker outlooks for certain thin film customers which in turn
reduced their spending plans resulting in the delay or
cancellation of orders for thin film lines, and other adverse
operating conditions within the solar industry.
Applied utilized the discounted cash flow method of the income
approach to estimate the fair value of the Energy and
Environmental Solutions reporting unit. Although considered, the
market approach was not used as comparable enterprises,
market-based growth rates, and gross margins were not considered
to be representative of the Energy and Environmental Solutions
reporting unit. While the results of the first step of the
impairment test indicated that goodwill and intangible assets
within the Energy and Environmental Solutions reporting unit
were not impaired, the estimated fair value in excess of
carrying value declined significantly from the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2009, when impairment tests were last conducted, to
approximately $200 million (or 19 percent over the
carrying value of the reporting unit) at the end of the second
quarter of fiscal 2010. The evaluation of goodwill and
intangible assets for impairment requires the exercise of
significant judgment. The estimates used in the impairment
testing were consistent with the discrete forecasts that Applied
uses to manage its business, and considered the significant
developments that occurred during the quarter. Cash flows beyond
the discrete forecasts were estimated using a terminal value
rate, which considered the long-term earnings growth rate
specific to the Energy and Environmental Solutions reporting
unit. The estimated future cash flows were discounted to present
value using a discount rate that was the value-weighted average
of Applieds estimated cost of equity and debt derived
using both known and estimated market metrics, and was adjusted
to reflect risk factors that considered both the timing and
risks associated with the estimated cash flows. While there are
inherent uncertainties related to the significant assumptions
used and managements application of these assumptions in
conducting the goodwill impairment analysis, Applied believes
that the income approach and the related assumptions used
provides a reasonable
39
estimate of the fair value of the Energy and Environmental
Solutions reporting unit. In the event of future adverse
business conditions in the market in which the Energy and
Environmental Solutions reporting unit operates, Applied will be
required to reassess and update its forecasts and estimates used
in a future impairment analysis. If the results of this analysis
are lower than current estimates, a material impairment charge
may result at that time. (See Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.)
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the six months ended May 2, 2010, cash, cash
equivalents and investments increased by $298 million from
$3.3 billion as of October 25, 2009.
Cash, cash equivalents and investments consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2,
|
|
|
October 25,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
|
|
$
|
1,577
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments
|
|
$
|
3,565
|
|
|
$
|
3,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applied generated $899 million of cash in operating
activities for the six months ended May 2, 2010. The
primary sources of cash from operating activities for the six
months ended May 2, 2010 were net income, as adjusted to
exclude the effect of non-cash charges including depreciation,
amortization, restructuring and asset impairments, equity based
compensation, and changes in components of working capital.
Applied utilized programs to discount letters of credit issued
by customers of $53 million for the six months ended
May 2, 2010. Discounting of letters of credit depends on
many factors, including the willingness of financial
institutions to discount the letters of credit and the cost of
such arrangements. For the six months ended May 2, 2010,
Applied factored accounts receivable of $49 million and
discounted promissory notes of $1 million. Days sales
outstanding for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 decreased to
57 days, compared to 67 days in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010, primarily due to higher revenue and a faster
collection rate. Applieds working capital decreased to
$3.6 billion at May 2, 2010 from $3.7 billion at
October 25, 2009, due primarily to an increase in accounts
payable and accrued expenses and income taxes payable with a
decrease in income taxes receivable, which was partially offset
by an increase in accounts receivable. During the second quarter
of fiscal 2010, Applied received a U.S. federal income tax
refund of approximately $130 million for the carryback of
Applieds net operating loss from fiscal 2009 to fiscal
2005.
Applied used $710 million of cash from investing activities
during the six months ended May 2, 2010, primarily due to
the acquisition of Semitool, a public company based in the state
of Montana, for $323 million, net of cash acquired.
Purchases of investments, net of proceeds from sales and
maturities of investments, totaled $289 million. Capital
expenditures were $98 million for the six months ended
May 2, 2010 and included investment in the construction of
a solar R&D/demonstration center in Xian, China and a
manufacturing facility in Singapore.
Applied used $169 million of cash for financing activities
during the six months ended May 2, 2010, consisting
primarily of $161 million in cash dividends paid to
stockholders and $100 million in common stock repurchases,
offset by $97 million in proceeds from common stock
issuances related to equity compensation awards. In March 2010,
Applieds Board of Directors approved a new stock
repurchase program authorizing up to $2 billion in
repurchases over the next three years ending in March 2013.
In March 2010, Applieds Board of Directors also approved
an increase in the quarterly cash dividend to $0.07 per share,
payable on June 16, 2010 to stockholders of record as of
May 26, 2010. Applied currently anticipates that cash
dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis,
although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the
discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on
Applieds financial condition, results of operations,
capital requirements, business conditions and other factors, as
well as a determination by the Board of Directors that cash
dividends are in the best interests of Applieds
stockholders.
40
Applied has credit facilities for unsecured borrowings in
various currencies of up to $1.1 billion, of which
$1.0 billion is comprised of a
5-year
revolving credit agreement with a group of banks that is
scheduled to expire in January 2012. This agreement provides for
borrowings in United States dollars at interest rates keyed to
one of the two rates selected by Applied for each advance and
includes financial and other covenants with which Applied was in
compliance at May 2, 2010. Remaining credit facilities in
the amount of approximately $85 million are with Japanese
banks. Applieds ability to borrow under these facilities
is subject to bank approval at the time of the borrowing
request, and any advances will be at rates indexed to the
banks prime reference rate denominated in Japanese yen. No
amounts were outstanding under any of the above credit
facilities at May 2, 2010.
In the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby
letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to third
parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either
Applied or its subsidiaries. As of May 2, 2010, the maximum
potential amount of future payments that Applied could be
required to make under these guarantee arrangements was
$88 million. Applied has not recorded any liability in
connection with these guarantee arrangements beyond that
required to appropriately account for the underlying transaction
being guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on historical
experience and information currently available, that it is
probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under
these guarantee arrangements.
Applied expects that changes in its business will affect its
working capital components, primarily related to its Energy and
Environmental Solutions segment, which includes products for
manufacturing solar PVs. Applied has entered into contracts with
multiple customers for its SunFab thin film line for projects of
varying scale. Fulfillment of these contracts requires Applied
to invest in inventory, particularly work in process, which
investment may be offset by customer deposits. Applieds
purchase of inventory in anticipation of customer demand may
create inventory risks. Changes in customer contracts or delays
may result in inventory charges if Applied determines the
inventory to be in excess of anticipated demand. During the
second quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied incurred $83 million
of inventory charges relating to thin film solar manufacturing
equipment as a result of customer cancellations.
Applieds investment portfolio consists principally of
investment grade money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury
and agency securities, municipal bonds, corporate bonds and, to
a small extent, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, as
well as equity securities. Applied regularly monitors the credit
risk in its investment portfolio and takes appropriate measures,
which may include the sale of certain securities, to manage such
risks prudently in accordance with its investment policies.
During the six months ended May 2, 2010, as part of its
regular investment review process, Applied recorded impairment
charges of $5 million associated with equity investments in
privately-held companies. At May 2, 2010, Applied had a
gross unrealized loss in its investment portfolio of
$0.6 million due to a decrease in the fair value of certain
fixed income securities. Applied regularly reviews its
investment portfolio to identify and evaluate investments that
have indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in
determining whether a loss is temporary include: the length of
time and extent to which fair value has been lower than the cost
basis; the financial condition, credit quality and near-term
prospects of the investee; and whether it is more
likely-than-not
that Applied will be required to sell the security prior to any
anticipated recovery in fair value. Generally, the contractual
terms of the investments do not permit settlement at prices less
than the amortized cost of the investments. While Applied cannot
predict future market conditions or market liquidity, Applied
believes that its investment policies provide an appropriate
means to manage the risks in its investment portfolio.
During the six months ended May 2, 2010, Applied recorded a
bad debt provision of $6 million as a result of certain
customers financial condition. During the six months ended
April 26, 2009, Applied recorded a bad debt provision of
$63 million as a result of certain customers
deteriorating financial condition. While Applied believes that
its allowance for doubtful accounts at May 2, 2010 is
adequate, it will continue to closely monitor customer liquidity
and economic conditions.
Although cash requirements will fluctuate based on the timing
and extent of factors such as those discussed above,
Applieds management believes that cash generated from
operations, together with the liquidity provided by existing
cash balances and borrowing capability, will be sufficient to
satisfy Applieds liquidity requirements for the next
12 months. For further details regarding Applieds
operating, investing and financing activities, see the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in this report.
41
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make
judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts
reported. Certain of these significant accounting policies are
considered to be critical accounting policies, as defined below.
A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both
material to the presentation of Applieds consolidated
financial statements and that requires management to make
difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a
material effect on Applieds financial condition or results
of operations. Specifically, these policies have the following
attributes: (1) Applied is required to make assumptions
about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the
estimate; and (2) different estimates Applied could
reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that are
reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on
Applieds financial condition or results of operations.
Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects
cannot be determined with certainty. Applied bases its estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions
believed to be applicable and reasonable under the
circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur,
as additional information is obtained and as Applieds
operating environment changes. These changes have historically
been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial
statements as soon as they became known. In addition, management
is periodically faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which
are not within its control and will not be known for prolonged
periods of time. These uncertainties include those discussed in
Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors. Based on a
critical assessment of its accounting policies and the
underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application
of those policies, management believes that Applieds
consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, and provide a meaningful presentation
of Applieds financial condition and results of operations.
Management believes that the following are critical accounting
policies:
Revenue
Recognition
Applied recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition
criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
sellers price to buyer is fixed or determinable; and
collectability is probable. Each sale arrangement may contain
commercial terms that differ from other arrangements. In
addition, Applied frequently enters into contracts that contain
multiple deliverables. Judgment is required to properly identify
the accounting units of the multiple deliverable transactions
and to determine the manner in which revenue should be allocated
among the accounting units. Moreover, judgment is used in
interpreting the commercial terms and determining when all
criteria of revenue recognition have been met in order for
revenue recognition to occur in the appropriate accounting
period. While changes in the allocation of the estimated sales
price between the units of accounting will not affect the amount
of total revenue recognized for a particular sales arrangement,
any material changes in these allocations could impact the
timing of revenue recognition, which could have a material
effect on Applieds financial condition and results of
operations.
In 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued amended
revenue recognition guidance for arrangements with multiple
deliverables and certain software sold with tangible products.
This new guidance eliminates the residual method of revenue
recognition and allows the use of managements best
estimate of selling price for individual elements of an
arrangement when vendor specific evidence or third party
evidence is unavailable. Applied implemented this guidance
prospectively beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 for
transactions that were initiated or materially modified during
fiscal 2010. The implementation of the new guidance had an
insignificant impact on reported net sales as compared to net
sales under previous guidance, as the new guidance did not
change the units of accounting within sales arrangements and the
elimination of the residual method for the allocation of
arrangement consideration had an inconsequential impact on the
amount and timing of reported net sales.
42
Warranty
Costs
Applied provides for the estimated cost of warranty when revenue
is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by
analyzing specific product, current and historical configuration
statistics and regional warranty support costs. Applieds
warranty obligation is affected by product and component failure
rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting
product failures during the warranty period. As Applieds
customer engineers and process support engineers are highly
trained and deployed globally, labor availability is a
significant factor in determining labor costs. The quantity and
availability of critical replacement parts is another
significant factor in estimating warranty costs. Unforeseen
component failures or exceptional component performance can also
result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs
differ substantially from Applieds estimates, revisions to
the estimated warranty liability would be required, which could
have a material adverse effect on Applieds business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Applied maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers
to make required payments. This allowance is based on historical
experience, credit evaluations, specific customer collection
history and any customer-specific issues Applied has identified.
Changes in circumstances, such as an unexpected material adverse
change in a major customers ability to meet its financial
obligation to Applied or its payment trends, may require Applied
to further adjust its estimates of the recoverability of amounts
due to Applied, which could have a material adverse effect on
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories are generally stated at the lower of cost or market,
with cost determined on a
first-in,
first-out basis. The carrying value of inventory is reduced for
estimated obsolescence by the difference between its cost and
the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future
demand. Applied evaluates the inventory carrying value for
potential excess and obsolete inventory exposures by analyzing
historical and anticipated demand. In addition, inventories are
evaluated for potential obsolescence due to the effect of known
and anticipated engineering change orders and new products. If
actual demand were to be substantially lower than estimated,
additional adjustments for excess or obsolete inventory may be
required, which could have a material adverse effect on
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Applied reviews goodwill and intangible assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable, and also
annually reviews goodwill and intangibles with indefinite lives
for impairment. Intangible assets, such as purchased technology,
are generally recorded in connection with a business
acquisition. The value assigned to intangible assets is usually
based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for the
success and life cycle of products and technology acquired. If
actual product acceptance differs significantly from the
estimates, Applied may be required to record an impairment
charge to reduce the carrying value of the reporting unit to its
realizable value. The fair value of a reporting unit is
estimated using both the income approach and the market approach
taking into account such factors as future anticipated operating
results and estimated cost of capital. Management uses
significant judgment when assessing goodwill for potential
impairment, especially in emerging markets. A severe decline in
market value could result in an unexpected impairment charge for
impaired goodwill, which could have a material adverse effect on
Applieds business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Income
Taxes
The effective tax rate is highly dependent upon the geographic
composition of worldwide earnings, tax regulations governing
each region, non-tax deductible expenses incurred in connection
with acquisitions and availability of tax credits. Management
carefully monitors the changes in many factors and adjusts the
effective income tax rate as required. If actual results differ
from these estimates, Applied could be required to record a
43
valuation allowance on deferred tax assets or adjust its
effective income tax rate, which could have a material adverse
effect on Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Applied accounts for income taxes by recognizing deferred tax
assets and liabilities using statutory tax rates for the effect
of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of
recorded assets and liabilities, net operating losses and tax
credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are also reduced by a
valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that a portion
of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Management has
determined that it is more likely than not that Applieds
future taxable income will be sufficient to realize its deferred
tax assets.
The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment
in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of
complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner
inconsistent with Applieds expectations could have a
material impact on Applieds results of operations and
financial condition.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Applieds investment portfolio includes fixed-income
securities with a fair value of approximately $1.9 billion
at May 2, 2010. These securities are subject to interest
rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase.
Based on Applieds investment portfolio at May 2,
2010, an immediate 100 basis point increase in interest
rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of the
portfolio of approximately $23 million. While an increase
in interest rates reduces the fair value of the investment
portfolio, Applied will not realize the losses in the
consolidated condensed statement of operations unless the
individual fixed-income securities are sold prior to recovery or
the loss is determined to be
other-than-temporary.
Certain operations of Applied are conducted in foreign
currencies. Applied enters into currency forward exchange and
option contracts to hedge a portion of, but not all, existing
and anticipated foreign currency denominated transactions
expected to occur within 24 months. Gains and losses on
these contracts are generally recognized in income at the time
that the related transactions being hedged are recognized.
Because the effect of movements in currency exchange rates on
currency forward exchange and option contracts generally offsets
the related effect on the underlying items being hedged, these
financial instruments are not expected to subject Applied to
risks that would otherwise result from changes in currency
exchange rates. Applied does not use derivative financial
instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Net foreign
currency gains and losses were not material for the three and
six months ended May 2, 2010.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
As required by
Rule 13a-15(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange
Act), Applieds management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation as
of the end of the period covered by this report, of the
effectiveness of Applieds disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e).
Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that Applieds disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed in Applieds SEC reports is
(i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and
(ii) accumulated and communicated to Applieds
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
As required by
Rule 13a-15(d),
Applieds management, including the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of
Applieds internal control over financial reporting to
determine whether any changes occurred during the fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, Applieds internal control over
financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no
such change during the fiscal quarter.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system will be
met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events
44
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
The information set forth above under the caption Legal
Matters in Note 9 contained in Notes to Consolidated
Condensed Financial Statements is incorporated herein by
reference.
The risk factors set forth below include any material changes
to, and supersede the description of, the risk factors disclosed
in Item 1A of Applieds 2009
Form 10-K.
The
industries that Applied serves are volatile and difficult to
predict.
As a supplier to the global semiconductor, flat panel display,
solar and related industries, Applied is subject to business
cycles, the timing, length and volatility of which can be
difficult to predict and which vary by reportable segment. These
industries historically have been cyclical due to sudden changes
in customers manufacturing capacity and advanced
technology requirements and spending, which depend in part on
customers capacity utilization, production volumes,
end-use demand, and inventory levels relative to demand, as well
as the rate of technology transitions and customers access
to affordable capital. These changes have affected the timing
and amounts of customers purchases and investments in
technology, and continue to affect Applieds orders, net
sales, operating expenses and net income.
To meet rapidly changing demand in the industries it serves,
Applied must effectively manage its resources and production
capacity for each of its segments as well as across multiple
segments. During periods of increasing demand for its products,
Applied must have sufficient manufacturing capacity and
inventory to meet customer demand; effectively manage its supply
chain; attract, retain and motivate a sufficient number of
qualified employees; and continue to control costs. During
periods of decreasing demand, Applied must appropriately align
its cost structure with prevailing market conditions;
effectively manage its supply chain; and motivate and retain key
employees. If Applied does not timely and appropriately adapt to
changes in its business environment, Applieds business,
financial condition or results of operations may be materially
and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks associated with the difficult financial
markets and uncertain global economy.
The tightening of the credit markets, disruption in the
financial markets, and global economic recession that began in
2008 contributed to significant slowdowns in the industries in
which Applied operates. Although economic and market conditions
have improved, continuing difficulties in the financial markets
and uncertainty regarding the global economic recovery are
posing challenges. The markets for semiconductors and flat panel
displays in particular depend largely on consumer spending.
Economic uncertainty exacerbates negative trends in consumer
spending and may cause certain Applied customers to push out,
cancel, or refrain from placing orders for equipment or
services, which may reduce net sales, reduce backlog, and affect
Applieds ability to convert backlog to sales. Difficulties
in obtaining capital, uncertain market conditions, or reduced
profitability may also cause some customers to scale back
operations, exit businesses, merge with other manufacturers, or
file for bankruptcy protection and potentially cease operations,
leading to customers reduced research and development
funding
and/or
capital expenditures and, in turn, lower sales
and/or
additional inventory or bad debt expense for Applied. These
conditions may also similarly affect key suppliers, which could
impair their ability to deliver parts and result in delays for
Applieds products or added costs. In addition, these
conditions may lead to strategic alliances by, or consolidation
of, other equipment manufacturers, which could adversely affect
Applieds ability to compete effectively.
Uncertainty about future economic and industry conditions also
makes it more challenging for Applied to forecast its operating
results, make business decisions, and identify the risks that
may affect its business, sources and uses of cash, financial
condition and results of operations. Applied may be required to
implement additional cost reduction efforts, including
restructuring activities,
and/or
modify its business model, which may adversely affect
Applieds ability to capitalize on opportunities in a
market recovery. In addition, Applied maintains an investment
portfolio that is subject to general credit, liquidity, foreign
exchange, market and interest rate risks. The risks to
45
Applieds investment portfolio may be exacerbated if
financial market conditions deteriorate and, as a result, the
value and liquidity of the investment portfolio could be
negatively impacted and lead to impairment charges. If Applied
does not timely and appropriately adapt to changes resulting
from the uncertain macroeconomic environment and industry
conditions, Applieds business, financial condition or
results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes in the
various industries in which it operates.
The global semiconductor, flat panel display, solar and related
industries in which Applied operates are characterized by
ongoing changes affecting some or all of these industries,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
increasing capital requirements for building and operating new
fabrication plants and customers ability to raise the
necessary capital, particularly in a difficult financial market;
|
|
|
|
differences in growth rates among the semiconductor, display and
solar industries;
|
|
|
|
abrupt and unforeseen shifts in the nature and amount of
customer and end-user demand;
|
|
|
|
the increasing cost and complexity for customers to move from
product design to volume manufacturing, which may slow the
adoption rate for new manufacturing technology;
|
|
|
|
the need to reduce the total cost of manufacturing system
ownership, due in part to greater demand for lower-cost consumer
electronics as compared to business information technology
spending;
|
|
|
|
the heightened importance to customers of system reliability and
productivity and the effect on demand for fabrication systems as
a result of their increasing productivity, device yield and
reliability;
|
|
|
|
the increasing importance of, and difficulties in, developing
products with sufficient differentiation to influence
customers purchasing decisions;
|
|
|
|
requirements for shorter cycle times for the development,
manufacture and installation of manufacturing equipment;
|
|
|
|
price and performance trends for semiconductor devices, LCDs and
solar PVs, and the corresponding effect on demand for such
products;
|
|
|
|
the increasing importance of the availability of spare parts to
maximize the time that customers systems are available for
production;
|
|
|
|
the increasing role for and complexity of software in Applied
products; and
|
|
|
|
the increasing focus on reducing energy usage and improving the
environmental impact and sustainability associated with
manufacturing operations.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes in the semiconductor, flat panel display,
solar and related industries, its business, financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to
the semiconductor industry.
The greatest portion of Applieds revenues and
profitability historically has been derived from sales of
manufacturing equipment to the global semiconductor industry. In
addition, a majority of the revenues of Applied Global Services
is from sales of service products to semiconductor
manufacturers. The semiconductor industry is characterized by
ongoing changes particular to that industry in addition to the
general industry changes described in the preceding risk factor,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the increasing cost of research and development due to many
factors, including: decreasing linewidths on a chip; the use of
new materials such as cobalt and yttrium; more complex device
structures; more applications and process steps; increasing chip
design costs; and the increasing cost and complexity of an
integrated manufacturing process;
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
the growing number of types and varieties of semiconductors and
number of applications across multiple substrate sizes;
|
|
|
|
differing market growth rates and capital requirements for
different applications, such as memory (including NAND flash and
DRAM), logic and foundry, and Applieds ability to compete
in these market segments;
|
|
|
|
the increasing cost and complexity for semiconductor
manufacturers to move more technically advanced capability and
smaller linewidths to volume manufacturing, and the resulting
impact on the rates of technology transition and investment in
capital equipment;
|
|
|
|
semiconductor manufacturers increasing adoption of more
productive 300mm systems and reductions in 200mm system
capacity, and the resulting effect on demand for manufacturing
equipment and services;
|
|
|
|
the decreasing rate of capital expenditures as a percentage of
semiconductor manufacturers revenue;
|
|
|
|
customers increasing need for shorter cycle times between
order placement and product shipment;
|
|
|
|
technology developments in related markets, such as lithography,
to which Applied may need to adapt;
|
|
|
|
competitive factors that make it difficult to enhance market
position, especially in larger market segments such as etch;
|
|
|
|
the increasing concentration of wafer starts in one country,
Korea, where Applieds service penetration and
service-revenue-per-wafer-start have been lower than in other
regions;
|
|
|
|
the increasing fragmentation of semiconductor markets, leading
certain markets to become too small to support the cost of a new
fabrication plant, while others require less technologically
advanced products; and
|
|
|
|
the cost, technical complexity and timing of a proposed
transition from 300mm to 450mm wafers.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes occurring in the semiconductor industry, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to
the flat panel display industry.
The global flat panel display industry historically has
experienced considerable volatility in capital equipment
investment levels, due in part to the limited number of LCD
manufacturers and the concentrated nature of LCD end-use
applications. Recently, industry growth has depended to a
considerable extent on consumer demand for increasingly larger
and more advanced TVs. In addition to the general industry
changes described above in the third risk factor, the display
industry is characterized by ongoing changes particular to that
industry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the planned expansion of manufacturing facilities in China by
display manufacturers based in other countries, and uncertainty
regarding their ability to obtain government approvals;
|
|
|
|
technical and financial difficulties associated with
transitioning to larger substrate sizes for LCDs;
|
|
|
|
the effect of a slowing rate of transition to larger substrate
sizes on capital intensity and product differentiation;
|
|
|
|
new energy efficiency standards for large-screen LCD
TVs; and
|
|
|
|
uncertainty with respect to future LCD technology end-use
applications and growth drivers.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes occurring in the display industry, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
47
Applied
is exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to
the solar industry.
Applied anticipates that an increasing portion of its business
will be in the emerging solar market, which, in addition to the
general industry changes described above in the third risk
factor, is characterized by ongoing changes specific to the
solar industry, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the impact on demand for solar PV products arising from the cost
of electricity generated by solar PV technology compared to the
cost of electricity from the existing grid or other energy
sources;
|
|
|
|
the varying energy policies of governments around the world and
their effect in influencing the rate of growth of the solar
market and between certain market segments such as rooftop
(which is more suited for
c-Si
modules) and ground-mounted, utility-scale (which is more suited
for thin film modules), including the availability and amount of
government incentives for solar power such as tax credits,
incentives, rebates, renewable portfolio standards that require
electricity providers to sell a targeted amount of energy from
renewable sources, and goals for solar installations on
government facilities;
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and amount of end demand for solar PVs
that adversely impact the sales growth rates and profitability
of Applieds products;
|
|
|
|
the uncertain rate of growth for the thin film solar market,
which depends in part on the relative cost and performance of
competing solar products, the extent of investment or
participation in the solar market by utilities and other power
providers that generate, transmit or distribute power to
end-users, and government incentives that target utility-scale
solar;
|
|
|
|
evolving industry standards, such as a standard form factor for
thin film solar modules;
|
|
|
|
varying levels of infrastructure investment for smart
grid technologies to modernize and enhance the
transmission, distribution and use of electricity, which link
distributed solar PV sources to population centers, increase
transmission capability, and optimize power usage;
|
|
|
|
regulatory and third party certification requirements, and
customers ability to timely satisfy such requirements;
|
|
|
|
the increasing solar PV production capacity in China;
|
|
|
|
access to affordable financing and capital by customers and
end-users; and
|
|
|
|
increasingly greater factory output and scalability of solar PVs.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
the ongoing changes occurring in the solar industry, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Applied
must adapt its business and product offerings to respond to
competition and rapid technological changes.
As Applied operates in a highly competitive environment, its
future success depends on many factors, including the effective
commercialization and customer acceptance of its
nanomanufacturing technology equipment, service and related
products. In addition, Applied must successfully execute its
growth strategy, including enhancing market share in existing
markets, expanding into related markets, cultivating new markets
and exceeding industry growth rates, while constantly improving
its operational performance. The development, introduction and
support of a broadening set of products in more varied
competitive environments have grown increasingly complex and
expensive over time. Furthermore, new or improved products may
entail higher costs and reduced profits. Applieds
performance may be adversely affected if it does not timely,
cost-effectively and successfully:
|
|
|
|
|
develop new products, improve
and/or
develop new applications for existing products, and adapt
similar products for use by customers in different applications
and/or
markets with varying technical requirements;
|
|
|
|
appropriately price and achieve market acceptance of products;
|
|
|
|
differentiate its products from those of competitors and any
disruptive technologies, meet performance specifications, and
drive efficiencies and cost reductions;
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
maintain operating flexibility to enable different responses to
different markets, customers and applications;
|
|
|
|
grow the market acceptance and profitability of its thin film
solar products;
|
|
|
|
allocate resources, including people and R&D funding, among
Applieds products and between the development of new
products and the enhancement of existing products, as most
appropriate and effective for future growth;
|
|
|
|
accurately forecast demand, work with suppliers and meet
production schedules for its products;
|
|
|
|
improve its manufacturing processes and achieve cost
efficiencies across product offerings;
|
|
|
|
adapt to changes in value offered by companies in different
parts of the supply chain;
|
|
|
|
qualify products for volume manufacturing with its customers;
|
|
|
|
implement changes in its design engineering methodology,
including those that enable reduction of material costs and
cycle time, greater commonality of platforms and types of parts
used in different systems, greater effectiveness of product life
cycle management, and reduced energy usage and environmental
impact; and
|
|
|
|
accomplish the simultaneous
start-up of
multiple integrated thin film solar production lines.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage these challenges, its
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Operating
in multiple industries, and the entry into new markets and
industries, entail additional challenges.
As part of its growth strategy, Applied must successfully expand
into related or new markets and industries, either with its
existing nanomanufacturing technology products or with new
products developed internally or obtained through acquisitions.
The entry into different markets involves additional challenges,
including those arising from:
|
|
|
|
|
the need to devote additional resources to develop new products
for, and operate in, new markets;
|
|
|
|
differing rates of profitability and growth among its multiple
businesses;
|
|
|
|
Applieds ability to anticipate demand, capitalize on
opportunities, and avoid or minimize risks;
|
|
|
|
the complexity of managing multiple businesses with variations
in production planning, execution, supply chain management and
logistics;
|
|
|
|
the adoption of new business models, such as the supply of an
integrated production line consisting of a suite of Applied and
non-Applied equipment to manufacture solar PVs;
|
|
|
|
the need to undertake activities to grow demand for end-products;
|
|
|
|
the need to develop adequate new business processes and systems;
|
|
|
|
Applieds ability to rapidly expand its operations to meet
increased demand and the associated effect on working capital;
|
|
|
|
new materials, processes and technologies;
|
|
|
|
the need to attract, motivate and retain employees with skills
and expertise in these new areas;
|
|
|
|
new and more diverse customers and suppliers, including some
with limited operating histories, uncertain
and/or
limited funding, evolving business models
and/or
locations in regions where Applied does not have existing
operations;
|
|
|
|
different customer service requirements;
|
|
|
|
new and/or
different competitors with potentially more financial or other
resources and industry experience;
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
entry into new industries and countries, with differing levels
of government involvement, laws and regulations, and business,
employment and safety practices;
|
|
|
|
third parties intellectual property rights; and
|
|
|
|
the need to comply with, or work to establish, industry
standards and practices.
|
If Applied does not successfully manage the risks resulting from
its diversification and entry into new markets and industries,
its business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is exposed to the risks of operating a global
business.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2010, approximately
90 percent of Applieds net sales were to customers in
regions outside the United States. Certain of Applieds
R&D
and/or
manufacturing facilities, as well as suppliers to Applied, are
also located outside the United States, including in China and
Korea. Applied is also expanding its business and operations in
new countries. The global nature of Applieds business and
operations presents challenges, including but not limited to
those arising from:
|
|
|
|
|
varying regional and geopolitical business conditions and
demands;
|
|
|
|
political and social attitudes, laws, rules, regulations and
policies within countries that favor domestic companies over
non-domestic companies, including customer- or
government-supported efforts to promote the development and
growth of local competitors;
|
|
|
|
variations among, and changes in, local, regional, national or
international laws and regulations (including protection of
intellectual property and other legal rights, and tax and import
/export restrictions), as well as the interpretation and
application of such laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
global trade issues, including those related to the
interpretation and application of import and export licenses;
|
|
|
|
positions taken by governmental agencies regarding possible
national commercial
and/or
security issues posed by international business operations;
|
|
|
|
fluctuating raw material, commodity and energy costs;
|
|
|
|
challenges associated with managing more geographically and
culturally diverse operations, projects and people;
|
|
|
|
variations in the ability to develop relationships with
suppliers and other local businesses;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates and currency exchange rates,
including the relative strength or weakness of the
U.S. dollar and the euro;
|
|
|
|
the need to provide sufficient levels of technical support in
different locations;
|
|
|
|
political instability, natural disasters (such as earthquakes,
floods or storms), pandemics, terrorism or acts of war in
locations where Applied has operations, suppliers or sales;
|
|
|
|
cultural and language differences;
|
|
|
|
shipping costs
and/or
delays;
|
|
|
|
the need to continually improve the Companys operating
cost structure;
|
|
|
|
difficulties and uncertainties associated with the entry into
new countries;
|
|
|
|
uncertainties with respect to economic growth rates in various
countries; and
|
|
|
|
uncertainties with respect to growth rates for the manufacture
and sales of semiconductors, LCDs and solar PVs in the
developing economies of certain countries.
|
Many of these challenges are present in China and Korea, which
are experiencing significant growth of both suppliers and
competitors to Applied. Applied further believes that China and
Korea present large potential markets
50
for its products and opportunity for growth over the long term,
although at lower projected levels of profitability and margins
for certain products than historically have been achieved in
other regions. In addition, Applied must regularly reassess the
size, capability and location of its global infrastructure and
make appropriate changes, and must have effective change
management processes and procedures to address changes in its
business and operations. These challenges may materially and
adversely affect Applieds business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Applied
is exposed to risks associated with a highly concentrated
customer base.
Applieds semiconductor and flat panel display customer
bases historically have been, and are becoming even more, highly
concentrated as a result of economic and industry conditions.
Certain customers have experienced significant ownership or
management changes, consolidated with other manufacturers,
outsourced manufacturing activities, or engaged in collaboration
or cooperation arrangements with other manufacturers. In
addition, customers have entered into strategic alliances or
industry consortia that have increased the influence of key
industry participants in technology decisions made by their
partners. In the solar area, while the number of solar PV
manufacturing customers increases as the number of market
entrants grows, the size of contracts with utility-scale
customers is expected to rise in the longer term as the industry
moves to greater factory output.
In this environment, contracts or orders from a relatively
limited number of semiconductor and display manufacturers have
accounted for, and are expected to continue to account for, a
substantial portion of Applieds business, which may result
in added complexities in managing customer relationships and
transactions. In addition, the mix and type of customers, and
sales to any single customer, may vary significantly from
quarter to quarter and from year to year. If customers do not
place orders, or they substantially reduce, delay or cancel
orders, Applied may not be able to replace the business. As
Applieds products are configured to customer
specifications, changing, rescheduling or canceling orders may
result in significant, non-recoverable costs. Major customers
may also seek, and on occasion receive, pricing, payment,
intellectual property-related, or other commercial terms that
are less favorable to Applied. These factors could have a
material adverse effect on Applieds business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Manufacturing
interruptions or delays could affect Applieds ability to
meet customer demand, while the failure to estimate customer
demand accurately could result in excess or obsolete
inventory.
Applieds business depends on its timely supply of
equipment, services and related products that meet the rapidly
changing technical and volume requirements of its customers,
which depends in part on the timely delivery of parts,
components and subassemblies (collectively, parts) from
suppliers. Some key parts may be subject to long lead-times
and/or
obtainable only from a single supplier or limited group of
suppliers, and some sourcing or subassembly is provided by
suppliers located in countries other than the United States,
including China and Korea. Cyclical industry conditions and the
volatility of demand for manufacturing equipment increase
capital, technical, operational and other risks for companies
throughout Applieds supply chain. Further, the adverse
conditions in the credit and financial markets and industry
slowdowns in recent periods have caused, and may continue to
cause, some suppliers to scale back operations, exit businesses,
merge with other companies, or file for bankruptcy protection
and possibly cease operations, potentially affecting
Applieds ability to obtain quality parts on a timely
basis. Applied may experience significant interruptions of its
manufacturing operations, delays in its ability to deliver
products or services, increased costs or customer order
cancellations as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
the failure or inability of suppliers to timely deliver
sufficient quantities of quality parts;
|
|
|
|
volatility in the availability and cost of materials;
|
|
|
|
difficulties or delays in obtaining required import or export
approvals;
|
|
|
|
information technology or infrastructure failures;
|
|
|
|
natural disasters (such as earthquakes, floods or
storms); or
|
|
|
|
other causes (such as regional economic downturns, pandemics,
political instability, terrorism, or acts of war) that could
result in delayed deliveries, manufacturing inefficiencies,
increased costs or order cancellations.
|
51
In addition, Applieds need to rapidly increase its
business and manufacturing capacity to meet increases in demand
or expedited shipment schedules may exacerbate any interruptions
in Applieds manufacturing operations and supply chain and
the associated effect on Applieds working capital.
Moreover, if actual demand for Applieds products is
different than expected, Applied may purchase more/fewer parts
than necessary or incur costs for canceling, postponing or
expediting delivery of parts. If Applied purchases inventory in
anticipation of customer demand that does not materialize, or if
customers reduce or delay orders, Applied may incur excess
inventory charges. Any or all of these factors could materially
and adversely affect Applieds business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Applied
is exposed to risks associated with acquisitions and strategic
investments.
Applied has made, and in the future intends to make,
acquisitions of, and investments in, companies, technologies or
products in existing, related or new markets for Applied.
Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including but not limited
to:
|
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from other operational
matters;
|
|
|
|
inability to complete acquisitions as anticipated or at all;
|
|
|
|
inability to realize anticipated benefits;
|
|
|
|
failure to commercialize purchased technologies;
|
|
|
|
inability to capitalize on characteristics of new markets that
may be significantly different from Applieds existing
markets and where competitors may have stronger market positions;
|
|
|
|
failure to attract, retain and motivate key employees from the
acquired business;
|
|
|
|
exposure to new operational risks, rules, regulations, customs
and practices to the extent acquired businesses are located in
countries where Applied has not historically conducted business;
|
|
|
|
challenges associated with managing new, more diverse and more
widespread operations, projects and people;
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain and protect intellectual property rights in
key technologies;
|
|
|
|
inadequacy or ineffectiveness of an acquired companys
internal financial controls, disclosure controls and procedures,
and/or
environmental, health & safety, human resource, or
other policies or practices;
|
|
|
|
impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill as a
result of changing business conditions, technological
advancements or
worse-than-expected
performance of the segment;
|
|
|
|
the risk of litigation or disputes with customers, suppliers,
partners or stockholders of an acquisition target arising from a
proposed or completed transaction;
|
|
|
|
unknown, underestimated
and/or
undisclosed commitments or liabilities;
|
|
|
|
inappropriate scale of acquired entities critical
resources or facilities for business needs; and
|
|
|
|
ineffective integration of operations, systems, technologies,
products or employees of an acquired business.
|
Applied also makes strategic investments in other companies,
including companies formed as joint ventures, which may decline
in value
and/or not
meet desired objectives. The success of these investments
depends on various factors over which Applied may have limited
or no control and, particularly with respect to joint ventures,
requires ongoing and effective cooperation with strategic
partners. The risks to Applieds strategic investment
portfolio may be exacerbated by unfavorable financial market and
macroeconomic conditions and, as a result, the value of the
investment portfolio could be negatively impacted and lead to
impairment charges. Mergers and acquisitions and strategic
investments are inherently subject to significant risks, and the
inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and
adversely affect Applieds business, financial condition
and results of operations. If Applied does not successfully
manage the risks associated with acquisitions and strategic
investments, its business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
52
The
ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees is vital
to Applieds success.
Applieds success and competitiveness depend in large part
on its ability to attract, retain and motivate key employees.
Achieving this objective may be difficult due to many factors,
including fluctuations in global economic and industry
conditions, changes in Applieds management or leadership,
competitors hiring practices, cost reduction activities
(including workforce reductions), and the effectiveness of
Applieds compensation and benefit programs, including its
equity-based programs. Applied periodically evaluates its
overall compensation program and makes adjustments, as
appropriate, to enhance its competitiveness. If Applied does not
successfully attract, retain and motivate key employees, Applied
may be unable to capitalize on its opportunities and its
operating results may be materially and adversely affected.
The
failure to successfully implement and conduct off-shoring and
outsourcing activities and other operational initiatives could
adversely affect results of operations.
To better align its costs with market conditions, increase its
presence in growing markets, enhance productivity, and improve
efficiencies, Applied conducts engineering, software
development, manufacturing, sourcing and other operations in
regions outside the United States, particularly India, China,
and Korea, and outsources certain functions to third parties,
including companies in the United States, India, China, Korea
and other countries. Outsourced functions include certain
engineering, manufacturing, customer support, software
development, information technology support, finance and
administrative activities. The expanding role of third party
providers has required changes to Applieds existing
operations and the adoption of new procedures and processes for
retaining and managing these providers, as well as
redistributing responsibilities as warranted, in order to
realize the potential productivity and operational efficiencies,
assure quality and continuity of supply, and protect
Applieds intellectual property.
In addition, Applied is implementing a comprehensive program to
better align its global organizations and processes, including
initiatives to enhance the Asia supply chain, integrate its
sales teams into the business units, and improve back office and
information technology infrastructure for more efficient
transaction processing. Applied also is implementing a
multi-year, company-wide program to transform certain business
processes, including the transition to a single enterprise
resource planning (ERP) software system to perform various
functions. The implementation of additional functionality to the
ERP system entails certain risks, including difficulties with
changes in business processes that could disrupt Applieds
operations, such as its ability to track orders and timely ship
products, project inventory requirements, manage its supply
chain and aggregate financial and operational data. The
implementation of new initiatives may not achieve the
anticipated benefits and may divert managements attention
from other operational activities, negatively affect employee
morale, or have other unintended consequences.
If Applied does not effectively develop and implement its
off-shoring and outsourcing strategies, if required export and
other governmental approvals are not timely obtained, if
Applieds third party providers do not perform as
anticipated, or if there are delays or difficulties in enhancing
business processes, Applied may not realize anticipated
productivity improvements or cost efficiencies, and may
experience operational difficulties, increased costs (including
energy and transportation), manufacturing interruptions or
delays, inefficiencies in the structure
and/or
operation of its supply chain, loss of its intellectual property
rights, quality issues, increased product
time-to-market,
and/or
inefficient allocation of human resources, any or all of which
could materially and adversely affect Applieds business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Applied
is exposed to various risks related to legal proceedings or
claims and protection of intellectual property
rights.
Applied from time to time is, and in the future may be, involved
in legal proceedings or claims regarding patent infringement,
intellectual property rights, antitrust, environmental
regulations, securities, contracts, product performance, product
liability, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade
secrets, employment, workplace safety, and other matters.
Applied also on occasion receives notification from customers
who believe that Applied owes them indemnification or other
obligations related to claims made against such customers by
third parties. In February 2010, the Seoul Prosecutors
Office for the Eastern District in Korea indicted certain
employees of
53
Applied Materials Korea (AMK), including the former head of AMK
who at the time of indictment was a vice president of Applied
Materials, Inc., along with employees of several other
companies, alleging the improper receipt and use of the
confidential information of a major customer. Applied is
investigating the allegations and surrounding circumstances.
Legal proceedings and claims, whether with or without merit, and
associated internal investigations, may: be time-consuming and
expensive to prosecute, defend or conduct; divert
managements attention and other Applied resources; inhibit
Applieds ability to sell its products; result in adverse
judgments for damages, injunctive relief, penalties and fines;
and/or
negatively affect Applieds business. There can be no
assurance regarding the outcome of current or future legal
proceedings, claims or investigations. If Applied is not able to
favorably resolve or settle legal proceedings or claims, or in
the event of any adverse findings against Applied or any of its
employees, Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected
and Applied may suffer harm to its reputation.
Applieds success depends in significant part on the
protection of its intellectual property and other rights.
Infringement of Applieds rights by a third party, such as
the unauthorized manufacture or sale of equipment or spare
parts, could result in uncompensated lost market and revenue
opportunities for Applied. Applieds intellectual property
rights may not provide significant competitive advantages if
they are circumvented, invalidated, rendered obsolete by the
rapid pace of technological change, or if Applied does not
adequately protect or assert these rights. Furthermore, the laws
and practices of other countries, including China, India, Taiwan
and Korea, permit the protection and enforcement of
Applieds rights to varying extents, which may not be
sufficient to protect Applieds rights. Applied previously
entered into an arrangement with one of its competitors to
decrease the risk of patent infringement lawsuits in the future.
There can be no assurance that the intended results of this
arrangement will be achieved or that Applied will be able to
adequately protect its intellectual property rights with the
restrictions associated with the arrangement. If Applied is not
able to favorably resolve or settle claims, obtain or enforce
intellectual property rights, obtain necessary licenses on
commercially reasonable terms,
and/or
successfully prosecute or defend its intellectual property
position, Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected
and Applied may suffer harm to its reputation.
Changes
in tax rates or tax assets and liabilities could affect results
of operations.
As a global company, Applied is subject to taxation in the
United States and various other countries. Significant judgment
is required to determine and estimate worldwide tax liabilities.
Applieds future annual and quarterly tax rates could be
affected by numerous factors, including changes in the:
(1) applicable tax laws; (2) amount and composition of
pre-tax income in countries with differing tax rates; or
(3) valuation of Applieds deferred tax assets and
liabilities. In addition, Applied is subject to regular
examination by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax
authorities, and from time to time initiates amendments to
previously filed tax returns. Applied regularly assesses the
likelihood of favorable or unfavorable outcomes resulting from
these examinations and amendments to determine the adequacy of
its provision for income taxes. Although Applied believes its
tax estimates are reasonable, there can be no assurance that the
tax authorities will agree with such estimates. Applied may have
to engage in litigation to achieve the results reflected in the
estimates, which may be time-consuming and expensive. There can
be no assurance that Applied will be successful or that any
final determination will not be materially different from the
treatment reflected in Applieds historical income tax
provisions and accruals, which could materially and adversely
affect Applieds financial condition and results of
operations.
Applied
is subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental and
safety regulations.
Applied is subject to environmental and safety regulations in
connection with its global business operations, including but
not limited to: regulations related to the development,
manufacture and use of its products; recycling and disposal of
materials used in its products or in producing its products; the
operation of its facilities; and the use of its real property.
The failure or inability to comply with existing or future
environmental and safety regulations, such as those related to
climate change, could result in: (1) significant
remediation liabilities; (2) the imposition of fines;
(3) the suspension or termination of the development,
manufacture, sale or use of certain of its products;
(4) limitations on the operation of its facilities or
ability to use its real property;
and/or
(5) a decrease in the value of its real property, each of
which could have a material adverse effect on Applieds
business, financial condition and results of operations.
54
Applied
is exposed to various risks related to the regulatory
environment.
Applied is subject to various risks related to: (1) new,
different, inconsistent or even conflicting laws, rules and
regulations that may be enacted by legislative bodies
and/or
regulatory agencies in the countries in which Applied operates;
(2) disagreements or disputes between national or regional
regulatory agencies related to international trade; and
(3) the interpretation and application of laws, rules and
regulations. If Applied is found by a court or regulatory agency
not to be in compliance with applicable laws, rules or
regulations, Applieds business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Applied
is subject to internal control evaluations and attestation
requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Applied must include in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
a report of management on the effectiveness of Applieds
internal control over financial reporting. Ongoing compliance
with this requirement is complex, costly and time-consuming. If
Applied fails to maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting or Applieds management does not timely
assess the adequacy of such internal control, Applied could be
subject to regulatory sanctions and the publics perception
of Applied may decline.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
The following table provides information as of May 2, 2010
with respect to the shares of common stock repurchased by
Applied during the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
That May Yet be
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Announced Program*
|
|
|
the Program*
|
|
|
|
(Shares in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Shares in thousands)
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Month #1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(February 1, 2010 to February 28, 2010)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Month #2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(March 1, 2010 to March 28, 2010)
|
|
|
4,010
|
|
|
$
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
4,010
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
Month #3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(March 29, 2010 to May 2, 2010)
|
|
|
3,621
|
|
|
$
|
13.47
|
|
|
|
3,621
|
|
|
$
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,631
|
|
|
$
|
13.10
|
|
|
|
7,631
|
|
|
$
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
On March 8, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a stock
repurchase program for up to $2.0 billion in repurchases
over the next three years, ending March 2013. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
55
Exhibits are numbered in accordance with the Exhibit Table
of Item 601 of
Regulation S-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.67
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
10
|
.68
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Applied Materials, Inc. 2005 Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
10
|
.69
|
|
Amended and restated Applied Materials, Inc. Senior Executive
Bonus Plan
|
|
10
|
.70
|
|
Amended and restated Applied Materials, Inc. Applied Incentive
Plan
|
|
10
|
.71
|
|
Form of Performance Share Agreement for use under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
|
|
10
|
.72
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use under the Applied
Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
56
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
George S. Davis
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
June 9, 2010
Thomas S. Timko
Corporate Vice President,
Corporate Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
June 9, 2010
57
exv10w67
Exhibit 10.67
AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO THE
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(April 1, 1995 Restatement)
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., having adopted the Applied Materials, Inc. Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan (the Plan) effective as of January 1, 1993, and having amended and/or restated
the Plan on several occasions, hereby again amends the Plan, as follows:
1. Section 3.3 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
3.3 Deemed Investment of Accounts. Although no assets will be segregated or
otherwise set aside with respect to a Participants Account, the amount that is
ultimately payable to the Participant with respect to his or her Account shall be
determined as if such Account had been invested in such manner as the Committee, in
its sole discretion, may specify from time to time. The Committee, in its sole
discretion, shall adopt (and may modify from time to time) such rules and procedures
as it deems necessary or appropriate to implement the deemed investment of the
Participants Accounts. The exact amount to be credited (or debited) as deemed
earnings, gains or losses with respect to any Participants Account will be
determined by the Committee under such formulae as the Committee, in its sole
discretion, adopts from time to time. Notwithstanding any contrary Plan provision,
in no event may the methods or formulae selected by the Committee to calculate and
credit (or debit) deemed earnings, gains or losses on Participants Accounts cause
the Plan to be considered materially modified under Section 409A of the Code.
2. The first sentence of Section 4.3 is amended by deleting the phrase crediting of
deemed interest therefrom and substituting the phrase crediting (or debiting) of deemed
earnings, gains or losses therefor.
3. The phrase deemed interest is deleted and the phrase deemed earnings, gains or
losses is substituted therefor everywhere it appears in the Plan.
4. The phrase credited with deemed interest is deleted and the phrase credited (or
debited) with deemed earnings, gains or losses is substituted therefor everywhere it
appears in the Plan.
5. This Amendment No. 7 to the Plan is effective as of January 1, 2010.
In Witness Whereof, Applied Materials, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this
Amendment No. 7 to the Plan on the date specified below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc.
|
|
Dated: April 26, 2010 |
By |
/s/ Ron Miller
|
|
|
|
Ron Miller |
|
|
|
Corporate Vice President, Global Rewards |
|
|
2
exv10w68
Exhibit 10.68
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., having adopted the Applied Materials, Inc. 2005 Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan (the Plan) effective as of January 1, 2005, and having amended and/or restated
the Plan on several occasions, hereby again amends the Plan, as follows:
1. Effective as of December 8, 2008, Section 1.11 is amended by deleting the phrase Global
Executive Incentive Plan therefrom and substituting the phrase Applied Incentive Plan therefor.
2. Effective as of January 1, 2005, the first sentence of Section 3.2 is amended by deleting
the word last therefrom.
3. Section 3.7 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
3.7 Deemed Investment of Accounts. Although no assets will be segregated or
otherwise set aside with respect to a Participants Account, the amount that is
ultimately payable to the Participant with respect to his or her Account shall be
determined as if such Account had been invested in such manner as the Committee, in
its sole discretion, may specify from time to time. The Committee, in its sole
discretion, shall adopt (and may modify from time to time) such rules and procedures
as it deems necessary or appropriate to implement the deemed investment of the
Participants Accounts. The exact amount to be credited (or debited) as deemed
earnings, gains or losses with respect to any Participants Account will be
determined by the Committee under such formulae as the Committee, in its sole
discretion, adopts from time to time.
4. The first sentence of Section 4.3 is amended by deleting the phrase crediting of
deemed interest therefrom and substituting the phrase crediting (or debiting) of deemed
earnings, gains or losses therefor.
5. The title of Section 5.8.4 is amended by deleting the word Interest therefrom and
substituting the word Investment therefor.
6. The phrase deemed interest is deleted and the phrase deemed earnings, gains or
losses is substituted therefor everywhere it appears in the Plan.
7. The phrase credited with deemed interest is deleted and the phrase credited (or
debited) with deemed earnings, gains or losses is substituted therefor everywhere it
appears in the Plan.
8. Except as otherwise specified above, this Amendment No. 3 to the restated Plan is
effective as of January 1, 2010.
In
Witness Whereof, Applied Materials, Inc., by its duly authorized officer, has executed this
Amendment No. 3 to the restated Plan on the date specified below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applied Materials, Inc.
|
|
Dated: April 26, 2010 |
By |
/s/ Ron Miller
|
|
|
|
Ron Miller |
|
|
|
Corporate Vice President, Global Rewards |
|
|
2
exv10w69
Exhibit 10.69
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
SENIOR EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
(May 10, 2010 Restatement)
SECTION 1
ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE
1.1 Purpose. Applied Materials, Inc. having established the Applied Materials, Inc. Senior Executive
Bonus Plan (the Plan) effective as of September 23, 1994, and having subsequently amended and
restated the Plan, hereby amends and restates the Plan effective as of September 16, 2008, as
follows. The Plan is intended to increase shareholder value and the success of the Company by
motivating key executives (a) to perform to the best of their abilities, and (b) to achieve the
Companys objectives. The Plans goals are to be achieved by providing such executives with
incentive awards based on the achievement of goals relating to the performance of the Company and
its individual business units. The Plan is intended to permit the payment of bonuses that qualify
as performance-based compensation under Code Section 162(m).
1.2 Effective Date. The Plan is subject to the approval of a majority of the shares of the Companys common
stock that are present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
SECTION 2
DEFINITIONS
The following words and phrases shall have the following meanings unless a different meaning
is plainly required by the context:
2.1 Actual Award means as to any Performance Period, the actual (if any) payable to a Participant for the
Performance Period. Each Actual Award is determined by the Payout Formula for the Performance
Period, subject to the Committees authority under Section 3.5 to reduce the award otherwise
determined by the Payout Formula.
2.2 Affiliate means any corporation or other entity (including, but not limited to, partnerships and joint
ventures) controlled by the Company.
2.3 Base Salary means as to any Performance Period, 100% of the Participants annualized salary rate on the
last day of the Performance Period. Such Base Salary shall be before both (a) deductions for taxes
or benefits, and (b) deferrals of compensation pursuant to Company-sponsored plans.
2.4 Board means the Companys Board of Directors.
1
2.5 Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Reference to a specific section of the
Code or regulation thereunder shall include such section or regulation, any valid regulation
promulgated under such section, and any comparable provision of any future legislation or
regulation amending, supplementing or superseding such section or regulation.
2.6 Committee means the committee appointed by the Board (pursuant to Section 5.1) to administer the Plan.
The Committee shall consist of no fewer than two (2) members of the Board.
2.7 Company means Applied Materials, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
2.8 Customer Satisfaction MBOs means as to any Participant for any Performance Period, the objective and measurable
individual goals set by a management by objectives process and approved by the Committee, which
goals relate to the satisfaction of external or internal customer requirements and/or ratings.
2.9 Determination Date means the latest possible date that will not jeopardize a Target Award or Actual Awards
qualification as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.
2.10 Disability means a permanent and total disability determined in accordance with standards adopted by the
Committee from time to time.
2.11 Earnings Per Share means as to any Performance Period, Net Income, divided by a weighted average number of common
shares outstanding and dilutive common equivalent shares deemed outstanding.
2.12 Fiscal Year means the fiscal year of the Company.
2.13 Individual MBOs means as to a Participant for any Performance Period, the objective and measurable goals set
by a management by objectives process and approved by the Committee, in its discretion.
2.14 Intentional Misconduct means a Participants deliberate engagement in any one
or more of the following: (a) fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement or any other act or acts of
similar gravity resulting or intended to result directly or indirectly in substantial personal
enrichment to the Participant at the expense of the Company; (b) a material violation of a federal,
state or local law or regulation applicable to the Companys business that has a significant
negative effect on the Companys financial results; or (c) a material breach of the Participants
fiduciary duty owed to the Company that has a significant negative effect on the Companys
financial results; provided, however, that a Participants exercise of judgment or actions (or
abstention from action), and/or decision-making will not constitute Intentional Misconduct if such
judgment, action (or abstention from action) and/or decision is, in the good faith determination of
the Board, reasonable based on the facts and circumstances known to the Participant at the time of
such judgment, action (or abstention from action) and/or decision; and such judgment, action (or
abstention from action) and/or decision is in an area or situation in which (i) discretion must be
exercised by the Participant or (ii) differing views or opinions may apply.
2
2.15 Market Share means as to any Performance Period, the Companys or a business units percentage of a market
segment with respect to a product.
2.16 Maximum Award means as to any Participant for any Performance Period, $5 million. The Maximum Award is the
maximum amount which may be paid to a Participant for any Performance Period.
2.17 Net Income means as to any Performance Period, the income after taxes for the Performance Period
determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
2.18 New Orders means as to any Performance Period, the firm orders for a system, product, part, or service
that are being recorded for the first time as defined in the Companys Order Recognition Policy.
2.19 Operating Profit means as to any Performance Period, the difference between revenue and related costs and
expenses, excluding income derived from sources other than regular activities and before income
deductions.
2.20 Participant means as to any Performance Period, an officer of the Company or of an Affiliate who has been
selected by the Committee for participation in the Plan for that Performance Period.
2.21 Payout Formula means as to any Performance Period, the formula or payout matrix established by the Committee
pursuant to Section 3.4 in order to determine the Actual Awards, if any, to be paid to
Participants. The formula or matrix may differ from Participant to Participant.
2.22 Performance Goals means the goal(s) (or combined goal(s)) determined by the Committee, in its discretion, to be
applicable to a Participant for a Performance Period. As determined by the Committee, the
Performance Goals applicable to each Participant shall provide for a targeted level or levels of
achievement using one or more of the following measures: (a) Revenue, (b) Customer Satisfaction
MBOs, (c) Earnings Per Share, (d) Individual MBOs, (e) Market Share, (f) Net Income, (g) New
Orders, (h) Operating Profit, (i) Return on Designated Assets, (j) Return on Equity, (k) Return on
Sales, and (l) Total Shareholder Return. Any criteria used may be measured, as applicable, (i) in
absolute terms, (ii) in relative terms, including, but not limited to, the passage of time and/or
against other companies or financial metrics, (iii) on a per share and/or share per capita basis,
(iv) against the performance of the Company as a whole or against particular segments or products
of the Company and/or (v) on a pre-tax or after-tax basis. Prior to the Determination Date, the
Committee shall determine whether any element(s) (for example, but not by way of limitation, the
effect of mergers or acquisitions) shall be included in or excluded from the calculation of any
Performance Goal with respect to any Participants, whether or not such determinations result in any
Performance Goal being measured on a basis other than generally accepted accounting principles.
2.23 Performance Period means any Fiscal Year or such other period longer than a Fiscal Year but not in excess of
three Fiscal Years, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. With respect to any
Participant, there shall exist no more than four (4) Performance Periods at any one time.
3
2.24 Retirement means, with respect to any Participant, a termination of his or her employment with the
Company and all of its Affiliates after: (a) obtaining at least sixty (60) years of age and whose
age plus Years of Service with the Company is not less than seventy (70), or (b) obtaining at least
sixty-five (65) years of age.
2.25 Return on Designated Assets means as to any Performance Period, Net Income divided by the average of beginning and ending
designated Company or business unit assets.
2.26 Return on Equity means as to any Performance Period, the percentage equal to Net Income divided by average
stockholders equity, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
2.27 Return on Sales means as to any Performance Period, the percentage equal to Net Income, divided by Revenue.
2.28 Revenue means net sales for the Performance Period, determined in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
2.29 Section 16 Officer means a person who is an officer of the Company within the
meaning of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
2.30 Section 409A means Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended and the regulations and guidance thereunder, as they may be amended or modified from time
to time.
2.31 Target Award means the target award payable under the Plan to a Participant for the Performance Period,
expressed as a percentage of his or her Base Salary, as determined by the Committee in accordance
with Section 3.3.
2.32 Total Shareholder Return means as to any Performance Period, the total return (change in share price plus reinvestment
of any dividends) of a share of the Companys common stock.
2.33 Years of Service means the number of months (or a fraction thereof) from a
Participants latest hire date with the Company or its Affiliate to the date in question, divided
by twelve (12). The Participants latest hire date will be determined after giving effect to the
non-401(k) plan principles of North American Human Resources Policy No. 2-06, Re-Employment of
Former Employees/Bridging of Service, as such policy may be amended, revised or superseded from
time to time.
SECTION 3
SELECTION OF PARTICIPANTS AND DETERMINATION OF AWARDS
3.1 Selection of Participants. On or prior to the Determination Date, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall select
the officers of the Company who shall be Participants for the Performance Period. The Committee,
in its sole discretion, also may designate as Participants one or
4
more individuals (by name or
position) who are expected to become officers during a Performance Period. Participation in the
Plan is in the sole discretion of the Committee, and on a Performance Period by Performance Period
basis. Accordingly, an officer who is a Participant for a given Performance Period in no way is
guaranteed or assured of being selected for participation in any subsequent Performance Period or
Periods.
3.2 Determination of Performance Goals. On or prior to the Determination Date, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall
establish the Performance Goals for each Participant for the Performance Period. Such Performance
Goals shall be set forth in writing.
3.3 Determination of Target Awards. On or prior to the Determination Date, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall
establish a Target Award for each Participant. Each Participants Target Award shall be determined
by the Committee in its sole discretion, and each Target Award shall be set forth in writing.
3.4 Determination of Payout Formula or Formulae. On or prior to the Determination Date, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall
establish a Payout Formula or Formulae for purposes of determining the Actual Award, if
any, payable to each Participant. Each Payout Formula shall (a) be in writing, (b) be based on a
comparison of actual performance to the Performance Goals, (c) provide for the payment of a
Participants Target Award if the Performance Goals for the Performance Period are achieved, and
(d) provide for an Actual Award greater than or less than the Participants Target Award, depending
upon the extent to which actual performance exceeds or falls below the Performance Goals.
Notwithstanding the preceding, no Participants Actual Award under the Plan may exceed his or her
Maximum Award.
3.5 Determination of Actual Awards. After the end of each Performance Period, the Committee shall certify in writing (for
example, in its meeting minutes) the extent to which the Performance Goals applicable to each
Participant for the Performance Period were achieved or exceeded, as determined by the Committee.
The Actual Award for each Participant shall be determined by applying the Payout Formula to the
level of actual performance that has been certified by the Committee. Notwithstanding any contrary
provision of the Plan, (a) the Committee, in its sole discretion, may eliminate or reduce the
Actual Award payable to any Participant below that otherwise would be payable under the Payout
Formula, (b) if a Participant terminates employment with the Company prior to the end of a
Performance Period for a reason other than Retirement, Disability or death, he or she shall not be
entitled to the payment of an Actual Award for the Performance Period, and (c) the Board, in its
sole discretion, may require a Participant to forfeit, return or reimburse the Company all or a
portion of his or her Actual Award in accordance with Section 4.5 below.
5
SECTION 4
PAYMENT OF AWARDS
4.1 Right to Receive Payment. Each Actual Award that may become payable under the Plan shall be paid solely from the
general assets of the Company. Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to create a trust or to
establish or evidence any Participants claim of any right other than as an unsecured general
creditor with respect to any payment to which he or she may be entitled.
4.2 Timing of Payment. Payment of each Actual Award shall be made after the end of the Performance Period during
which the Actual Award was earned but no later than the fifteen (15th) day of the third
(3rd) month after the end of the Fiscal Year in which such Performance Period ended. In
addition, if the relevant Performance Period exceeds one Fiscal Year, the payment of each Actual
Award for such Performance Period shall be made within the time period set forth in the prior
sentence, but in all events after the end of the Performance Period but on or before December 31 of
the calendar year in which the Performance Period ends.
4.3 Form of Payment. Each Actual Award normally shall be paid in cash (or its equivalent) in a single lump sum.
However, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may declare any Actual Award, in whole or in part,
payable in restricted stock granted under the Companys Employee Stock Incentive Plan. The number
of shares granted shall be determined by dividing the cash amount foregone by the fair market value
of a share on the date that the cash payment otherwise would have been made. For this purpose,
fair market value shall mean the closing price on the NASDAQ/National Market for the day in
question. Any restricted stock so awarded shall vest over a period of not more than four years,
subject to acceleration for termination of employment due to death, Disability, or Retirement.
4.4 Payment in the Event of Death. If a Participant dies prior to the payment of an Actual Award earned by him or her prior to
death for a prior Performance Period, the Actual Award shall be paid to his or her estate.
4.5 Clawback in Connection with a Material Negative Financial Restatement. Pursuant
to the Companys clawback policy, the Board, in its sole discretion, may require a Participant to
forfeit, return or reimburse the Company all or a portion of his or her Actual Award that is paid
on or after December 7, 2009, if (i) the Participant is or was a Section 16 Officer during the
applicable Performance Period, and (ii) the Participant deliberately engaged in Intentional
Misconduct that was determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, to be the primary cause of a
material negative restatement of a Company financial statement that was filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission and such financial statement, as originally filed, is one of the
Companys three (3) most recently filed annual financial statements. The portion of the Actual
Award, if any, that a Participant may be required to forfeit, return or reimburse will be
determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, but will be no more than the after-tax portion of
the Actual Award that was (1) in excess of the
Actual Award he or she would have received had the Companys financial results been calculated
under the restated financial statements, and (2) paid within the period beginning on the date the
Committee determines the Actual Award (in accordance with Section 3.5 of the Plan) and ending on
the date that is twelve (12) months after the original filing of the financial statement that
subsequently was restated.
6
SECTION 5
ADMINISTRATION
5.1 Committee is the Administrator. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall consist of not less
than two (2) members of the Board. The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to
time by, and serve at the pleasure of, the Board. Each member of the Committee shall qualify as an
outside director under Section 162(m) of the Code. If it is later determined that one or more
members of the Committee do not so qualify, actions taken by the Committee prior to such
determination shall be valid despite such failure to qualify. Any member of the Committee may
resign at any time by notice in writing mailed or delivered to the Secretary of the Company. As of
the Effective Date of the Plan, the Plan shall be administered by the Human Resources and
Compensation Committee of the Board.
5.2 Committee Authority. It shall be the duty of the Committee to administer the Plan in accordance with the Plans
provisions. The Committee shall have all powers and discretion necessary or appropriate to
administer the Plan and to control its operation, including, but not limited to, the power to
(a) determine which officers shall be granted awards, (b) prescribe the terms and conditions of
awards, (c) interpret the Plan and the awards, (d) adopt such procedures and subplans as are
necessary or appropriate to permit participation in the Plan by officers who are foreign nationals
or employed outside of the United States, (e) adopt rules for the administration, interpretation
and application of the Plan as are consistent therewith, and (f) interpret, amend or revoke any
such rules.
5.3 Decisions Binding. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee, the Board, and any delegate of the
Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan shall be final, conclusive, and binding on all
persons, and shall be given the maximum deference permitted by law.
5.4 Delegation by the Committee. The Committee, in its sole discretion and on such terms and conditions as it may provide,
may delegate all or part of its authority and powers under the Plan to one or more directors and/or
officers of the Company; provided, however, that the Committee may not delegate its authority
and/or powers with respect to awards that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation
under Section 162(m) of the Code.
5.5 Tax Withholding. The Company shall withhold all applicable taxes from any payment, including any federal,
FICA, state, and local taxes.
SECTION 6
GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1 No Effect on Employment. Nothing in the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or an
Affiliate, as applicable, to terminate any Participants employment or service at any time, with or
without cause. For purposes of the Plan, transfer of employment of a Participant between the
Company and any one of its Affiliates (or between Affiliates) shall not be deemed a termination of
employment. Employment with the Company and its Affiliates is on an at-will basis only. The
Company expressly reserves the right, which may be exercised at any time and without regard to when
during or after a Performance Period such exercise
7
occurs, to terminate any individuals employment
with or without cause, and to treat him or her without regard to the effect which such treatment
might have upon him or her as a Participant.
6.2 Section 409A. It is intended that all bonuses payable under this Plan will be exempt from the
requirements of Section 409A pursuant to the short-term deferral exemption or, in the
alternative, to comply with the requirements of Section 409A so that none of the payments and
benefits to be provided under this Plan will be subject to the additional tax imposed under
Section 409A, and any ambiguities herein shall be interpreted to so comply or be exempt. Each
payment and benefit payable under this Plan is intended to constitute a separate payment for
purposes of Section 1.409A-2(b)(2) of the Treasury Regulations. The Company may, in good faith and
without the consent of any Participant, make any amendments to this Plan and take such reasonable
actions which it deems necessary, appropriate or desirable to avoid imposition of any additional
tax or income recognition under Section 409A prior to actual payment to the Participant.
6.3 Participation. No Employee shall have the right to be selected to receive an award under this Plan, or,
having been so selected, to be selected to receive a future award.
6.4 Indemnification. Each person who is or shall have been a member of the Committee, or of the Board, shall be
indemnified and held harmless by the Company against and from (a) any loss, cost, liability, or
expense that may be imposed upon or reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with or
resulting from any claim, action, suit, or proceeding to which he or she may be a party or in which
he or she may be involved by reason of any action taken or failure to act under the Plan or any
award, and (b) from any and all amounts paid by him or her in settlement thereof, with the
Companys approval, or paid by him or her in satisfaction of any judgment in any such claim,
action, suit, or proceeding against him or her, provided he or she shall give the Company an
opportunity, at its own expense, to handle and defend the same before he or she undertakes to
handle and defend it on his or her own behalf. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of
any other rights of indemnification to which such persons may be entitled under the Companys
Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws, by contract, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or under any
power that the Company may have to indemnify them or hold them harmless.
6.5 Successors. All obligations of the Company and any Affiliate under the Plan, with respect to awards
granted hereunder, shall be binding on any successor to the Company and/or such Affiliate, whether
the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger,
consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company
or such Affiliate.
6.6 Nonassignability. A Participant shall have no right to assign or transfer any interest under this Plan.
6.7 Nontransferability of Awards. No award granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise
alienated or hypothecated, other than by will, by the laws of descent and distribution. All rights
with respect to an award granted to a Participant shall be available during his or her lifetime
only to the Participant.
8
6.8 Deferrals. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may permit a Participant to defer receipt of the
payment of cash that would otherwise be delivered to a Participant under the Plan. Any such
deferral elections shall be subject to such rules and procedures as shall be determined by the
Committee in its sole discretion.
6.9 Governing Law. The Plan and all award agreements shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the
laws of the State of California, excluding its conflicts of laws provisions.
SECTION 7
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
7.1 Amendment and Termination. The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time and for any reason; provided,
however, that if and to the extent required to ensure the Plans qualification under Code
Section 162(m), any such amendment shall be subject to stockholder approval.
9
exv10w70
Exhibit 10.70
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
APPLIED INCENTIVE PLAN
(May 10, 2010 Restatement)
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
APPLIED INCENTIVE PLAN
(May 10, 2010 Restatement)
1. ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE
Applied Materials, Inc. (the Company), having established the Applied Materials, Inc.
Applied Incentive Plan (the Plan) effective as of December 8, 2008, hereby amends and restates
the Plan in its entirety effective as of May 10, 2010. The Plan is intended to increase
shareholder value and the success of the Company and its affiliates by motivating Plan Participants
to perform to the best of their abilities, and to achieve and even exceed the Companys objectives.
The Plans goals are to be achieved by providing Plan Participants with the potential to receive
incentive awards based on their meeting or exceeding performance goals set for the Company, their
business units, and/or the Participant.
2. DEFINITIONS
The following terms will have the following meanings unless a different meaning is plainly
required by the context:
2.1. Affiliate means any corporation or any other entity (including, but not limited
to, partnerships, joint ventures and limited liability companies) that the Committee determines to
be controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Company.
2.2. Board means the Companys Board of Directors.
2.3. Committee means the Companys Chief Executive Officer (the CEO) or a
committee of one or more employees or other individuals appointed by the CEO to administer the
Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of a Section 16 Officer, Committee means the
HRCC.
2.4. Company means Applied Materials, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
2.5. Disability means a Participants disability occurring during a Plan Year for
which the Participant actually receives benefits under a Company-sponsored long-term disability
plan.
2.6. HRCC means the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board.
2.7. Intentional Misconduct means a Participants deliberate engagement in any one
or more of the following: (a) fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement or any other act or acts of
similar gravity resulting or intended to result directly or indirectly in substantial personal
enrichment to the Participant at the expense of the Company; (b) a material violation of a federal,
state or local law or regulation applicable to the Companys business that has a significant
negative effect on the Companys financial results; or (c) a material breach of the Participants
fiduciary duty owed to the Company that has a significant negative effect on the
Companys
financial results; provided, however, that a Participants exercise of judgment or actions (or
abstention from action), and/or decision-making will not constitute Intentional Misconduct if such
judgment, action (or abstention from action) and/or decision is, in the good faith determination of
the Board, reasonable based on the facts and circumstances known to the Participant at the time of
such judgment, action (or abstention from action) and/or decision; and such judgment, action (or
abstention from action) and/or decision is in an area or situation in which (i) discretion must be
exercised by the Participant or (ii) differing views or opinions may apply.
2.8. Participant means, as to any Plan Year, an employee of the Company or its
Affiliate who (a) is in Grade 38, 39, x50 through Senior Executive, or x70 through x72, or (b) is
in Grade 37 and participated in the Plan as a Grade 37 during the immediately preceding Plan Year.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine that an
otherwise eligible employee will not be a Participant in the Plan for a given Plan Year.
2.9. Payable Award means the award, if any, payable to a Participant under the Plan
for a Plan Year.
2.10. Payout Formula or Payout Formulae means, as to any Plan Year, the
formula, or formulae or payout matrix established pursuant to Section 3.3 below to guide the
determination of any Payable Awards to be paid to Participants for that Plan Year. The formula or
matrix may differ from Participant to Participant and may differ from Plan Year to Plan Year.
2.11. Performance Goals means the financial and/or operational goals applicable to a
Participant for a Plan Year. Performance Goals may differ from Participant to Participant and may
differ from Plan Year to Plan Year.
2.12. Plan means the Applied Materials, Inc. Applied Incentive Plan as set forth in
this instrument and as hereafter amended from time to time.
2.13. Plan Year means the fiscal year of the Company.
2.14. Retirement means, with respect to any Participant, a termination of his or her
employment with the Company and all of its Affiliates after: (a) obtaining at least sixty (60)
years of age and whose age plus Years of Service with the Company is not less than seventy (70), or
(b) obtaining at least sixty-five (65) years of age.
2.15. Section 16 Officer means an employee of the Company or its Affiliate who is
subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
2.16. Section 409A means Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended and the regulations and guidance thereunder, as they may be amended or modified from time
to time.
2.17. Senior Executive means, as to any Plan Year, an officer of the Company with
grade level x10 and above, but excluding any officer selected by the HRCC to participate in the
Applied Materials, Inc. Senior Executive Bonus Plan for that Plan Year.
2
2.18. Years of Service means the number of months (or a fraction thereof) from a
Participants latest hire date with the Company or its Affiliate to the date in question, divided
by twelve (12). The Participants latest hire date will be determined after giving effect to the
non-401(k) plan principles of North American Human Resources Policy No. 2-06, Re-Employment of
Former Employees/Bridging of Service, as such policy may be amended, revised or superseded from
time to time.
3. PARTICIPATION AND DETERMINATION OF AWARDS
3.1. Participation. All eligible Participants will be automatically enrolled in the Plan each Plan Year; provided,
however, that an individual who first becomes a Participant after the first business day in August
of a Plan Year may not be enrolled in the Plan for that Plan Year. Participation in the Plan is
mandatory for any eligible Participants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee, in its sole
discretion, may determine that an otherwise eligible employee will not be a Participant in the Plan
for a given Plan Year. Accordingly, a Participant who participates in the Plan in a given Plan
Year is not in any way guaranteed or assured of participation in the Plan in any subsequent Plan
Year. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, a Participant in this Plan is not eligible for
any other Company incentive plan, including, but not necessarily limited to, milestone plans,
profit sharing plans, the Discretionary Bonus Incentive Plan, sales incentive plans, etc.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in determining whether an otherwise eligible employee shall become a
Participant with respect to a Plan Year, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, provide that an
individual will be deemed to have become a Participant on the first day of the Plan Year, if, as of
the first business day in August of such Plan Year, (a) he or she was an employee of an entity or
its predecessor that, by virtue of an acquisition or similar transaction by the Company, first
became an Affiliate after the first business day in August of such Plan Year, and (b) he or she
otherwise meets the definition of a Participant in Section 2.8 of the Plan.
3.2. Determination of Performance Goals. The Committee, in its sole discretion, will establish written Performance Goals for each
Participant for the Plan Year.
3.3. Determination of Payout Formula or Formulae. The Committee, in its sole discretion, will establish a Payout Formula or Payout Formulae for
purposes of serving as a guide for determining any Payable Awards. Each Payout Formula will (a) be
in writing, (b) be based on a comparison of actual performance against the Performance Goals,
(c) suggest a target Payable Award based on the assumption that the Performance Goals are met, and
(d) set a maximum Payable Award.
3.4. Determination of Payable Awards.
3.4.1. In General. After the end of each Plan Year, the Committee will determine the
extent to which each Participant exceeded, achieved, or missed his or her Performance Goals for the
Plan Year. The Payable Award for each Participant, if any, will be determined by the Committee, in
its sole discretion, with reference to the applicable Payout Formula. Notwithstanding any contrary
provision of the Plan, (a) the Committee, in its sole discretion, may increase, reduce, pro-rate or
eliminate a Participants Payable Award based on whatever factors it deems relevant, and (b) the
Board, in its sole discretion, may require a Participant to forfeit, return or reimburse the
Company all or a portion of his or her Payable Award in
3
accordance with Section 4.7 of the Plan.
The fact that a Participant achieved or exceeded his or her Performance Goals will not, in any
respect, guarantee that the Participant will receive any Payable Award or any specific amount of
Payable Award. As a result, a Participant has no right or entitlement to any Payable Award unless
and until the Committee, in its sole discretion, has determined the Payable Award with respect to
the Participant.
3.4.2. Discretion for One-Time Early Determination. Notwithstanding any contrary
provision of the Plan, during the 2010 Plan Year and except as provided below, the Committee may,
in its sole discretion, determine that a portion of a Participants potential Payable Award for the
2010 Plan Year will be determined and payable prior to the end of that Plan Year (the FY 2010
Discretionary Early Payment). If the Committee, in its sole discretion, determines that a
Participant will receive a FY 2010 Discretionary Early Payment, such determination will be subject
to the Committees discretion to increase, reduce, pro-rate or eliminate the Participants FY 2010
Discretionary Early Payment, if any, based on the factors the Committee deems relevant; provided,
however, that no FY 2010 Discretionary Early Payment made to any Participant may exceed forty
percent (40%) of the Participants target Payable Award based on the assumption that all the
Performance Goals are met at 100% levels for the fiscal year. The amount of any FY 2010
Discretionary Early Payment made to any Participant shall be deducted from the FY 2010 maximum
Payable Award determined in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
no FY 2010 Discretionary Early Payments may be determined or made with respect to (a) any
Participant who has elected to defer any portion of his or her Payable Award (if any) for the 2010
Plan Year under the Applied Materials, Inc. 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended,
or (b) any Section 16 Officer.
3.5. Eligibility for Payable Awards. Except as provided in this Section, a
Participant will be eligible for consideration for a Payable Award only if he or she remains an
employee with the Company or its Affiliates through the end of the Plan Year. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, a Participant will be eligible for consideration for a Payable Award if, during the Plan
Year, the Participant terminates employment with the Company and its Affiliates on account of
Retirement, Disability or death. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may determine whether a
Participant who has received any form of disciplinary action, including but not limited to a
written or final warning or is placed on a Performance Improvement Plan during the Plan Year is
entitled to a Payable Award for that Plan Year.
4. PAYMENT OF AWARDS
4.1. Right to Receive Payment. Any Payable Award will be paid solely from the
Companys general assets. Nothing in this Plan will be construed to create a trust or to establish
or evidence any Participants claim of any right other than as an unsecured general creditor with
respect to any payment to which he or she may be entitled.
4.2. Form of Payment. Any Payable Award under the Plan will be paid in cash, or its
equivalent, in a single lump sum.
4
4.3. Timing of Payment. Any Payable Award under the Plan will be paid as soon as
administratively practicable after such Payable Award has been determined by the Committee, but in
no event will such payment be made later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the third
(3rd) month immediately following the end of the Plan Year to which the Payable Award
relates. However, in the case of any Participant who is on a Company-approved personal leave of
absence on the last day of the Plan Year (or with respect to any FY 2010 Discretionary Early
Payment, the date on which such payment is determined by the Committee in accordance with Section
3.4.2 of the Plan), the Payable Award, if any, will not be paid until the Participant has returned
to work for at least 90 consecutive days following his or her return from the leave of absence (the
90-Day Service Period), in which case, the Payable Award, if any, will be paid as soon as
administratively practicable after the completion of the 90-Day Service Period, but in no event
will such payment be made later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the third
(3rd) month immediately following the later of (a) the end of the Plan Year in which the
90-Day Service Period is completed; or (b) the end of the Participants taxable year in which the
90-Day Service Period is completed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its sole
discretion, determine that the 90-Day Service Period will be waived for any reason, including, but
not limited to, with respect to a Participant who terminates employment with the Company or its
Affiliates during such 90-Day Service Period by reason of such Participants Retirement, Disability
or death. If the 90-Day Service Period is waived with respect to any Participant, the Payable
Award, if any, will be paid as soon as administratively practicable after such waiver, but in no
event will such payment be made later than the fifteenth (15th) day of the third
(3rd) month immediately following the later of (a) the end of the Plan Year in which the
90-Day Service Period is waived; or (b) the end of the Participants taxable year in which the
90-Day Service Period is waived. For purposes of clarity, a Participant who both is on a
Company-approved non-personal leave of absence and whose employment status is protected by
applicable law as a result of such leave of absence will not be subject to any 90-Day Service
Period requirement.
4.4. Taxes. Each Payable Award will be paid net of all applicable tax withholding and
deductions.
4.5. Payment in Event of Participants Death. If the Committee has determined, in its
sole discretion, that a Participant will receive a Payable Award, but the Participant is deceased
at the time such award is payable, then such Payable Award will be paid to the Participants estate
or to the beneficiary or beneficiaries entitled thereto under the intestacy laws governing the
disposition of the Participants estate.
4.6. Payment Through Affiliate. Payable Awards may be paid, in the Committees
discretion, through the Company or any of its Affiliates.
4.7. Clawback in Connection with a Material Negative Financial Restatement. Pursuant
to the Companys clawback policy, the Board, in its sole discretion, may require a Participant to
forfeit, return or reimburse the Company all or a portion of his or her Payable Award that is paid
on or after December 7, 2009, if (i) the Participant is or was a Section 16 Officer during the
applicable Plan Year, and (ii) the Participant deliberately engaged in Intentional Misconduct that
was determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, to be the primary cause of a material negative
restatement of a Company financial statement that was filed with the
5
U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission and such financial statement, as originally filed, is one of the Companys three (3)
most recently filed annual financial statements. The portion of the Payable Award, if any, that a
Participant may be required to forfeit, return or reimburse will be determined by the Board, in its
sole discretion, but will be no more than the after-tax portion of the Payable Award that
was: (1) in excess of the Payable Award he or she would have received had the Companys financial
results been calculated under the restated financial statements, and (2) paid within the period
beginning on the date the Committee determines the Payable Award (in accordance with Section 3.4 of
the Plan) and ending on the date that is twelve (12) months after the original filing of the
financial statement that subsequently was restated.
5. ADMINISTRATION
5.1. Committee is the Administrator. The Plan will be administered by the Committee.
5.2. Committee Authority. The Committee has all powers and discretion to administer
the Plan and to control its operation, including, but not limited to, the power and discretion to
(a) select Participants and make other determinations under Section 3; (b) make Plan rules and
regulations to address any situation or condition not specifically provided for by the Plan; and
(c) interpret the provisions of the Plan and any Payable Awards. Any determination, decision or
action of the Committee (or any delegate of the Committee) in connection with the construction,
interpretation, administration or application of the Plan will be final, conclusive, and binding
upon all persons, and will be given the maximum possible deference permitted by law.
5.3. Delegation by the Committee. The Committee, in its sole discretion and on such
terms and conditions as it may provide, may delegate all or part of its authority and/or powers
under the Plan to one or more officers or other employees of the Company or its Affiliates;
provided, however, that any decision, action or determination under the Plan by any such delegate
of the Committee will be subject to review and change by the Committee, in its sole discretion.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may not delegate its authority and/or powers under the
Plan with respect to Section 16 Officers.
6. GENERAL PROVISIONS
6.1. Nonassignability. A Participant will have no right to assign or transfer any
interest under this Plan.
6.2. Section 409A. It is intended that any Payable Awards under this Plan will be
exempt from the requirements of Section 409A pursuant to the short-term deferral exemption or, in
the alternative, will comply with the requirements of Section 409A so that none of the payments to
be provided under the Plan will be subject to the additional tax imposed under Section 409A, and
any ambiguities and ambiguous terms herein shall be interpreted to so comply or be exempt. Each
payment payable under this Plan is intended to constitute a separate payment for purposes of
Section 1.409A-2(b)(2) of the Treasury Regulations. The Company may, in good faith and without the
consent of any Participant, make any amendments to this Plan and take such reasonable actions which
it deems necessary, appropriate or desirable to avoid
6
imposition of any additional tax or income
recognition under Section 409A prior to actual payment to any Participant.
6.3. No Effect on Employment. The Plan, participation in the Plan, and administration
of the Plan do not confer any right upon any Participant for the continuation of his or her
employment with the Company or its Affiliates for any Plan Year or any other period. A
Participants employment with the Company or its Affiliates is fully terminable at will. The
Company and its Affiliates expressly reserve the right, which may be exercised at any time and
without regard to when during a Plan Year such exercise occurs, to terminate any Participants
employment with or without cause, and to treat him or her without regard to the effect that such
treatment might have upon him or her as a Participant.
6.4. No Individual Liability. Neither the Committee, nor any member of the Committee,
nor any delegate of the Committee, nor any member of the HRCC, nor any member of the Board will be
liable for any determination, decision or action made or taken in good faith with respect to the
Plan or any Payable Award under the Plan.
6.5. Integration. The Plan as stated in this document is the complete embodiment of
the terms and conditions of the Plan and supersedes any prior versions of the Plan and any prior or
contemporaneous agreements, promises, or representations concerning the subject matter of the Plan.
6.6. Amendment or Termination. The Committee or the HRCC may amend or terminate the
Plan at any time and for any reason by a written amendment. No individual director, officer, or
employee, regardless of his or her position at the Company or its Affiliates, otherwise has the
power to amend or alter the terms and conditions of the Plan, whether he or she purports to do so
verbally or in writing.
6.7. Arbitration. Any dispute arising from, or related to, this Plan will be settled
pursuant to the Applied Materials, Inc. Arbitration Policy, where such an arbitration policy is in
effect.
6.8. Severability; Governing Law. If any provision of the Plan is found to be invalid
or unenforceable, such provision will not affect the other provisions of the Plan, and the Plan
will be construed in all respects as if such invalid provision had been omitted. The provisions of
the Plan will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California,
with the exception of Californias conflict of laws provisions.
7
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
1. ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. DEFINITIONS |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. PARTICIPATION AND DETERMINATION OF AWARDS |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1. Participation |
|
|
3 |
|
3.2. Determination of Performance Goals |
|
|
3 |
|
3.3. Determination of Payout Formula or Formulae |
|
|
3 |
|
3.4. Determination of Payable Awards |
|
|
3 |
|
3.5. Eligibility for Payable Awards |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. PAYMENT OF AWARDS |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1. Right to Receive Payment |
|
|
4 |
|
4.2. Form of Payment |
|
|
5 |
|
4.3. Timing of Payment |
|
|
5 |
|
4.4. Taxes |
|
|
5 |
|
4.5. Payment in Event of Participants Death |
|
|
5 |
|
4.6. Payment Through Affiliate |
|
|
5 |
|
4.7. Clawback in Connection with a Material Negative Financial Restatement |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. ADMINISTRATION |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1. Committee is the Administrator |
|
|
6 |
|
5.2. Committee Authority |
|
|
6 |
|
5.3. Delegation by the Committee |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. GENERAL PROVISIONS |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1. Nonassignability |
|
|
6 |
|
6.2. Section 409A |
|
|
6 |
|
6.3. No Effect on Employment |
|
|
7 |
|
6.4. No Individual Liability |
|
|
7 |
|
6.5. Integration |
|
|
7 |
|
6.6. Amendment or Termination |
|
|
7 |
|
6.7. Arbitration |
|
|
7 |
|
6.8. Severability; Governing Law |
|
|
7 |
|
-i-
exv10w71
Exhibit 10.71
[EMPL_NAME]
Employee ID: [EMPLID]
Grant Number: [GRANT_ID]
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
PERFORMANCE SHARES AGREEMENT
NOTICE OF GRANT
Applied Materials, Inc. (the Company) hereby grants you, [EMPL_NAME] (the Employee), an
award of Performance Shares (also referred to as restricted stock units) under the Companys
Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan). The date of this Performance Shares Agreement (the
Agreement) is [GRANT_DT] (the Grant Date). Subject to the provisions of the Terms and
Conditions of Performance Shares Agreement (the Terms and Conditions), which constitute part of
this Agreement, and of the Plan, the principal features of this Award are as follows:
|
|
|
Number of Performance Shares:
|
|
[MAX_SHARES] |
(also referred to as restricted stock units) |
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of Performance Shares:
|
|
Please refer to the UBS
One Source website for
the vesting schedule
related to this grant of
Performance Shares
(click on the specific
grant under the tab
labeled
Grants/Awards/Units.).* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Except as otherwise provided in the Terms and Conditions of this Agreement, Employee will
not vest in the Performance Shares unless he or she is employed by the Company or one of its
Affiliates through the applicable vesting date. |
IMPORTANT:
Your electronic or written signature below indicates your agreement and understanding that
this grant is subject to all of the terms and conditions contained in the Terms and Conditions to
this Agreement and the Plan. For example, important additional information on vesting and
forfeiture of this grant is contained in paragraphs 3 through 5 and paragraph 7 of the Terms and
Conditions. PLEASE BE SURE TO READ ALL OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS GRANT. CLICK HERE
TO READ THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
By clicking the ACCEPT button below, you agree to the following: This electronic contract
contains my electronic signature, which I have executed with the intent to sign this Agreement.
-1-
Please be sure to retain a copy of your returned electronically signed Agreement; you may
obtain a paper copy at any time and at the Companys expense by requesting one from Stock Programs
(see paragraph 12 of the Terms and Conditions). If you prefer not to electronically sign this
Agreement, you may accept this Agreement by signing a paper copy of the Agreement and delivering it
to Stock Programs.
For Employees employed in China on the Grant Date: Under the State Administration of Foreign
Exchange (SAFE) regulations, the receipt of funds by you from the sale of Performance Shares must
be approved by SAFE. In order to comply with the SAFE regulations, the proceeds from the sale of
Performance Shares must be repatriated into China through an approved bank account set up and
monitored by the Company.
For Employees employed in the United Kingdom (U.K.) on the Grant Date:
National Insurance Contribution (NIC) The grant of your Performance Shares is subject to
the execution of a joint election between the Company and you (the Election), being formally
approved by the H.M. Revenue & Customs (the HMR&C) and remaining in force thereafter under which
you agree to pay all NICs that may become due in connection with the grant or vesting of
Performance Shares. The NICs include the primary NIC payable by an employee as well as the
secondary NIC payable by the employer in the absence of any election (referred to as the
Secondary Class 1 NIC). By accepting the Performance Shares, to the extent allowable by applicable
law, you hereby consent and agree to satisfy any liability the Company and/or your employer
realizes with respect to Secondary Class 1 NIC payments required to be paid by the Company and/or
your employer in connection with the grant or vesting of the Performance Shares.
In addition, by accepting the Performance Shares, you hereby authorize the Company or your
employer to withhold any such Secondary Class 1 NICs from the sale of a sufficient number of Shares
upon vesting of the Performance Shares. In addition and to the maximum extent permitted by law,
the Company (or the employing Affiliate) has the right to retain without notice from salary or
other amounts payable to you to satisfy such Secondary Class 1 NICs. The Company, in its
discretion, may require you, and you hereby agree, to make payment on demand for such contributions
by cash or check to UBS Financial Services, Inc., the Company or your employer, and such
contributions will be remitted to the HMR&C. If additional consents and/or elections are required
to accomplish the foregoing, you agree to provide them promptly upon request. If the foregoing is
not allowed under applicable law, the Company may rescind your Performance Shares. If you do not
enter an Election prior to the first vesting date or if the Election is revoked at any time by the
HMR&C, the Performance Shares shall become null and void without any liability to the Company
and/or your employer and shall lapse with immediate effect.
-2-
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
PERFORMANCE SHARES AGREEMENT
1. Grant. Applied Materials, Inc. (the Company) hereby grants to the Employee under
the Companys Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) the number of Performance Shares (also
referred to as restricted stock units) set forth on the first page of the Notice of Grant of this
Agreement, subject to all of the terms and conditions in this Agreement and the Plan. When Shares
are paid to the Employee in payment for the Performance Shares, par value will be deemed paid by
the Employee for each Performance Share by past services rendered by the Employee, and will be
subject to the appropriate tax withholdings. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms
used herein will have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.
2. Companys Obligation to Pay. Each Performance Share has a value equal to the Fair
Market Value of a Share on the date of grant. Unless and until the Performance Shares have vested
in the manner set forth in paragraphs 3 through 5, or paragraph 11, the Employee will have no right
to payment of such Performance Shares. Prior to actual payment of any vested Performance Shares,
such Performance Shares will represent an unsecured obligation. Payment of any vested Performance
Shares will be made in whole Shares only, provided, however, that if the Company determines that it
is necessary or advisable, the Shares subject to this Performance Share award shall be sold
immediately upon settlement of the Performance Shares award, and the Employee shall receive the
proceeds from the sale, less any applicable fees and taxes or other required withholding.
3. Vesting Schedule/Period of Restriction. Except as provided in paragraphs 4, 5 and
11, and subject to paragraph 7, the Performance Shares awarded by this Agreement will vest in
accordance with the vesting provisions set forth on the UBS One Source website (click on the
specific grant under the tab labeled Grants/Awards/Units). Performance Shares will not vest in
the Employee in accordance with any of the provisions of this Agreement unless the Employee will
have been continuously employed by the Company or by one of its Affiliates from the Grant Date
until the date the Performance Shares are otherwise scheduled to vest occurs.
4. Modifications to Vesting Schedule.
(a) Vesting upon Personal Leave of Absence. In the event that the Employee takes a personal
leave of absence (PLOA), the Performance Shares awarded by this Agreement that are scheduled to
vest will be modified as follows:
(i) if the duration of the Employees PLOA is six (6) months or less, the vesting schedule set
forth on the UBS One Source website (click on the specific grant under the tab labeled
Grants/Awards/Units) will not be affected by the Employees PLOA.
(ii) if the duration of the Employees PLOA is greater than six (6) months but not more than
twelve (12) months, the scheduled vesting of any Performance Shares awarded by this Agreement that
are not then vested will be deferred for a period of time equal to the duration of the Employees
PLOA less six (6) months.
-3-
(iii) if the duration of the Employees PLOA is greater than twelve (12) months, any
Performance Shares awarded by this Agreement that are not then vested will immediately terminate.
(iv) Example 1. Employee is scheduled to vest in Performance Shares on January 1, 2007. On
May 1, 2006, Employee begins a six-month PLOA. Employees Performance Shares will still be
scheduled to vest on January 1, 2007.
(v) Example 2. Employee is scheduled to vest in Performance Shares on January 1, 2007. On May
1, 2006, Employee begins a nine-month PLOA. Employees Performance Shares awarded by this Agreement
that are scheduled to vest after November 2, 2006 will be modified (this is the date on which the
Employees PLOA exceeds six (6) months). Employees Performance Shares now will be scheduled to
vest on April 1, 2007 (three (3) months after the originally scheduled date).
(vi) Example 3. Employee is scheduled to vest in Performance Shares on January 1, 2007. On
May 1, 2006, Employee begins a 13-month PLOA. Employees Performance Shares will terminate on May
2, 2007.
In general, a personal leave of absence does not include any legally required leave of
absence. The duration of the Employees PLOA will be determined over a rolling twelve (12) month
measurement period. Performance Shares awarded by this Agreement that are scheduled to vest during
the first six (6) months of the Employees PLOA will continue to vest as scheduled. However,
Performance Shares awarded by this Agreement that are scheduled to vest after the first six (6)
months of the Employees PLOA will be deferred or terminated depending on the length of the
Employees PLOA. The Employees right to vest in Performance Shares awarded by this Agreement will
be modified as soon as the duration of the Employees PLOA exceeds six (6) months.
(b) Death of Employee. In the event that the Employee incurs a Termination of Service due to
his or her death, one hundred percent (100%) of the Performance Shares subject to this Performance
Shares award will vest on the date of the Employees death. In the event that any applicable law
limits the Companys ability to accelerate the vesting of this award of Performance Shares, this
paragraph 4(b) will be limited to the extent required to comply with applicable law. If the
Employee is subject to Hong Kongs ORSO provisions, this paragraph 4(b) will not apply to this
award of Performance Shares.
5. Committee Discretion. The Committee, in its discretion, may accelerate the vesting
of the balance, or some lesser portion of the balance, of the Performance Shares at any time,
subject to the terms of the Plan. If so accelerated, such Performance Shares will be considered as
having vested as of the date specified by the Committee. Subject to the provisions of this
paragraph 5, if the Committee, in its discretion, accelerates the vesting of the balance, or some
lesser portion of the balance, of the Performance Shares, the payment of such accelerated
Performance Shares shall be made as soon as practicable upon or following the accelerated vesting
date, but in no event later than 60 days following the date such accelerated Performance Shares
vest.
-4-
Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or this Agreement to the contrary, if the vesting of the
balance, or some lesser portion of the balance, of the Performance Shares is accelerated in
connection with Employees Termination of Service (provided that such termination is a separation
from service within the meaning of Section 409A, as determined by the Company), other
than due to death, and if (a) the Employee is a specified employee within the meaning of Section
409A at the time of such Termination of Service and (b) the payment of such accelerated Performance
Shares will result in the imposition of additional tax under Section 409A if paid to the Employee
on or within the six (6) month period following Employees Termination of Service, then the payment
of such accelerated Performance Shares will not be made until the date six (6) months and one (1)
day following the date of Employees Termination of Service, unless the Employee dies following his
or her Termination of Service, in which case, the Performance Shares will be paid in Shares to the
Employees estate as soon as practicable following his or her death. It is the intent of this
Agreement to be exempt from or comply with the requirements of Section 409A so that none of the
Performance Shares provided under this Agreement or Shares issuable thereunder will be subject to
the additional tax imposed under Section 409A, and any ambiguities herein will be interpreted to be
so exempt or comply. For purposes of this Agreement, Section 409A means Section 409A of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and any proposed, temporary or final
Treasury Regulations and Internal Revenue Service guidance thereunder, as each may be amended from
time to time.
6. Payment after Vesting. Any Performance Shares that vest in accordance with
paragraphs 3 or 4 will be paid to the Employee (or in the event of the Employees death, to his or
her estate) as soon as practicable following the date of vesting, but in all cases within 60 days
following the date such Performance Shares vest, subject to paragraph 8. Any Performance Shares
that vest in accordance with paragraphs 5 or 11 will be paid to the Employee (or in the event of
the Employees death, to his or her estate) in accordance with the provisions of such paragraphs,
subject to paragraph 8. For each Performance Share that vests, the Employee will receive one
Share, subject to paragraph 8.
7. Forfeiture. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this Agreement and except in
the event of Employees death (see Paragraph 4(b)), the balance of the Performance Shares that have
not vested pursuant to paragraphs 3 through 5 or paragraph 11 at the time of the Employees
Termination of Service for any or no reason will be forfeited and automatically transferred to and
reacquired by the Company at no cost to the Company. [To be included for Awards subject to
performance-based vesting: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan or this Agreement,
the Board, in its sole discretion, may require the Employee to forfeit, return or reimburse the
Company all or a portion of the Performance Shares subject to this Award in accordance with
paragraph 16 of the Agreement.]
8. Withholding of Taxes. When Shares are issued as payment for vested Performance
Shares or, in the discretion of the Company, such earlier time as the Tax Obligations (defined
below) are due, the Company (or the employing Affiliate) will withhold a portion of the Shares that
have an aggregate market value sufficient to pay all taxes and social insurance liability and other
requirements in connection with the Shares, including, without limitation, (a) all federal, state
and local income, employment and any other applicable taxes that are required to be withheld by the
Company or the employing Affiliate, (b) the Employees and, to the extent required by the Company
(or the employing Affiliate), the Companys (or the employing Affiliates) fringe benefit tax
-5-
liability, if any, associated with the grant, vesting, or sale of the Performance Shares
awarded and the Shares issued thereunder, and (c) all other taxes or social insurance liabilities
with respect to which the Employee has agreed to bear responsibility (collectively, the Tax
Obligations). The number of Shares withheld pursuant to the prior sentence will be rounded up to
the nearest whole Share, with no refund provided in the U. S. for any value of the Shares withheld
in excess of the tax obligation as a result of such rounding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
Company, in its sole discretion, may require the Employee to make alternate arrangements
satisfactory to the Company for such withholdings or remittances in advance of the arising of any
remittance obligations to which the Employee has agreed or any withholding obligations.
Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this Agreement, no Shares will be issued unless and
until satisfactory arrangements (as determined by the Company) have been made by the Employee with
respect to the payment of any income and other taxes which the Company determines must be withheld
or collected with respect to such Shares. In addition and to the maximum extent permitted by law,
the Company (or the employing Affiliate) has the right to retain without notice from salary or
other amounts payable to the Employee, cash having a sufficient value to satisfy any Tax
Obligations that the Company determines cannot be satisfied through the withholding of otherwise
deliverable Shares or that are due prior to the issuance of Shares under the Performance Shares
award. All Tax Obligations related to the Performance Shares award and any Shares delivered in
payment thereof are the sole responsibility of the Employee. Further, Employee shall be bound by
any additional withholding requirements included in the Notice of Grant of this Agreement.
9. Rights as Stockholder. Neither the Employee nor any person claiming under or
through the Employee will have any of the rights or privileges of a stockholder of the Company in
respect of any Shares deliverable hereunder unless and until certificates representing such Shares
(which may be in book entry form) will have been issued, recorded on the records of the Company or
its transfer agents or registrars, and delivered to the Employee (including through electronic
delivery to a brokerage account). Notwithstanding any contrary provisions in this Agreement, any
quarterly or other regular, periodic dividends or distributions (as determined by the Company) paid
on Shares will affect neither unvested Performance Shares nor Performance Shares that are vested
but unpaid, and no such dividends or other distributions will be paid on unvested Performance
Shares or Performance Shares that are vested but unpaid. After such issuance, recordation and
delivery, the Employee will have all the rights of a stockholder of the Company with respect to
voting such Shares and receipt of dividends and distributions on such Shares.
10. No Effect on Employment. Subject to any employment contract with the Employee,
the terms of such employment will be determined from time to time by the Company, or the Affiliate
employing the Employee, as the case may be, and the Company, or the Affiliate employing the
Employee, as the case may be, will have the right, which is hereby expressly reserved, to terminate
or change the terms of the employment of the Employee at any time for any reason whatsoever, with
or without good cause. The transactions contemplated hereunder and the vesting schedule set forth
on the UBS One Source website (click on the specific grant under the tab labeled
Grants/Awards/Units) do not constitute an express or implied promise of continued employment for
any period of time. A leave of absence or an interruption in service (including an interruption
during military service) authorized or acknowledged by the Company or the Affiliate employing the
-6-
Employee, as the case may be, will not be deemed a Termination of Service for the purposes of
this Agreement.
11. Changes in Performance Shares. In the event that as a result of a stock or
extraordinary cash dividend, stock split, distribution, reclassification, recapitalization,
combination of Shares or the adjustment in capital stock of the Company or otherwise, or as a
result of a merger, consolidation, spin-off or other corporate transaction or event, the
Performance Shares will be increased, reduced or otherwise affected, and by virtue of any such
event the Employee will in his or her capacity as owner of unvested Performance Shares which have
been awarded to him or her (the Prior Performance Shares) be entitled to new or additional or
different shares of stock, cash or other securities or property (other than rights or warrants to
purchase securities); such new or additional or different shares, cash or securities or property
will thereupon be considered to be unvested Performance Shares and will be subject to all of the
conditions and restrictions that were applicable to the Prior Performance Shares pursuant to this
Agreement and the Plan. If the Employee receives rights or warrants with respect to any Prior
Performance Shares, such rights or warrants may be held or exercised by the Employee, provided that
until such exercise, any such rights or warrants, and after such exercise, any shares or other
securities acquired by the exercise of such rights or warrants, will be considered to be unvested
Performance Shares and will be subject to all of the conditions and restrictions which were
applicable to the Prior Performance Shares pursuant to the Plan and this Agreement. The Committee
in its sole discretion at any time may accelerate the vesting of all or any portion of such new or
additional shares of stock, cash or securities, rights or warrants to purchase securities or shares
or other securities acquired by the exercise of such rights or warrants; provided, however, that
the payment of such accelerated new or additional awards will be made in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph 5.
12. Address for Notices. Any notice to be given to the Company under the terms of
this Agreement shall be addressed to the Company, in care of Stock Programs, at Applied Materials,
Inc., 2881 Scott Boulevard, M/S 2023, P. O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95050, U.S.A., or at such
other address as the Company may hereafter designate in writing.
13. Grant is Not Transferable. Except to the limited extent provided in this
Agreement, this grant of Performance Shares and the rights and privileges conferred hereby shall
not be sold, pledged, assigned, hypothecated, transferred or disposed of any way (whether by
operation of law or otherwise) and shall not be subject to sale under execution, attachment or
similar process, until the Employee has been issued Shares in payment of the Performance Shares.
Upon any attempt to sell, pledge, assign, hypothecate, transfer or otherwise dispose of this grant,
or any right or privilege conferred hereby, or upon any attempted sale under any execution,
attachment or similar process, this grant and the rights and privileges conferred hereby
immediately will become null and void.
14. Restrictions on Sale of Securities. The Shares issued as payment for vested
Performance Shares under this Agreement will be registered under U. S. federal securities laws and
will be freely tradable upon receipt. However, Employees sale of the Shares may be subject to any
market blackout period that may be imposed by the Company and must comply with the Companys
insider trading policies, and any other applicable securities laws.
-7-
15. Binding Agreement. Subject to the limitation on the transferability of this grant
contained herein, this Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs,
legatees, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
16. [To be included for Awards subject to performance-based vesting: Clawback in
Connection with a Material Negative Financial Restatement. Pursuant to the Companys clawback
policy, the Board, in its sole discretion, may require the Employee to forfeit, return or reimburse
the Company all or a portion of his or her Performance Shares subject to this Award if (i) the
Employee is or was a Section 16 Person during the performance period applicable to the
performance-based vesting of the Performance Shares, and (ii) the Employee deliberately engaged in
Intentional Misconduct (as defined below) that was determined by the Board, in its sole
discretion, to be the primary cause of a material negative restatement of a Company financial
statement that was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and such financial
statement, as originally filed, is one of the Companys three (3) most recently filed annual
financial statements. The portion of this Award, if any, that the Employee may be required to
forfeit, return or reimburse will be determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, but will be
no more than the Clawback Maximum (as defined below).
(a) For purposes of this Agreement, Clawback Maximum means the portion of the Award that was
in excess of the Shares that the Employee would have received under this Award had the Companys
financial results been calculated under the restated financial statements .
(b) To the extent Tax Obligations on such Performance Shares were paid or due, such
forfeiture, return or reimbursement shall be limited to the after-tax portion of the Clawback
Maximum.
For purposes of this Agreement, Intentional Misconduct means the Employees deliberate
engagement in any one or more of the following: (a) fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement or any
other act or acts of similar gravity resulting or intended to result directly or indirectly in
substantial personal enrichment to the Employee at the expense of the Company; (b) a material
violation of a federal, state or local law or regulation applicable to the Companys business that
has a significant negative effect on the Companys financial results; or (c) a material breach of
the Employees fiduciary duty owed to the Company that has a significant negative effect on the
Companys financial results; provided, however, that the Employees exercise of judgment or actions
(or abstention from action), and/or decision-making will not constitute Intentional Misconduct if
such judgment, action (or abstention from action) and/or decision is, in the good faith
determination of the Board, reasonable based on the facts and circumstances known to the Employee
at the time of such judgment, action (or abstention from action) and/or decision; and such
judgment, action (or abstention from action) and/or decision is in an area or situation in which
(i) discretion must be exercised by the Employee or (ii) differing views or opinions may apply.]
17. Additional Conditions to Issuance of Certificates for Shares. The Company will
not be required to issue any certificate or certificates (which may be in book entry form) for
Shares hereunder prior to fulfillment of all the following conditions: (a) the admission of such
Shares to listing on all stock exchanges on which such class of stock is then listed; (b) the
completion of any registration or other qualification of such Shares under any U. S. state or
federal law or under the rulings or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission or any
other governmental
-8-
regulatory body, which the Committee will, in its sole discretion, deem necessary or
advisable; (c) the obtaining of any approval or other clearance from any U. S. state or federal
governmental agency, which the Committee will, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or
advisable; and (d) the lapse of such reasonable period of time following the date of vesting of the
Performance Shares as the Committee may establish from time to time for reasons of administrative
convenience.
18. Plan Governs. This Agreement is subject to all the terms and provisions of the
Plan. In the event of a conflict between one or more provisions of this Agreement and one or more
provisions of the Plan, the provisions of the Plan will govern.
19. Committee Authority. The Committee will have the power to interpret the Plan and
this Agreement and to adopt such rules for the administration, interpretation and application of
the Plan as are consistent therewith and to interpret or revoke any such rules (including, but not
limited to, the determination of whether or not any Performance Shares have vested). All actions
taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee in good faith will be final
and binding upon the Employee, the Company and all other interested persons. No member of the
Committee will be personally liable for any action, determination or interpretation made in good
faith with respect to the Plan or this Agreement.
20. Captions. Captions provided herein are for convenience only and are not to serve
as a basis for interpretation or construction of this Agreement.
21. Agreement Severable. In the event that any provision in this Agreement will be
held invalid or unenforceable, such provision will be severable from, and such invalidity or
unenforceability will not be construed to have any effect on, the remaining provisions of this
Agreement.
22. Modifications to the Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire
understanding of the parties on the subjects covered. The Employee expressly warrants that he or
she is not accepting this Agreement in reliance on any promises, representations, or inducements
other than those contained herein. Modifications to this Agreement or the Plan can be made only in
an express written contract executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in the Plan or this Agreement, the Company reserves the right to revise
this Agreement as it deems necessary or advisable, in its sole discretion and without the consent
of the Employee, to comply with Section 409A or to otherwise avoid imposition of any additional tax
or income recognition under Section 409A prior to the actual payment of Shares pursuant to this
award of Performance Shares.
23. Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan. By accepting this Performance
Shares award, the Employee expressly warrants that he or she has received a right to receive stock
under the Plan, and has received, read and understood a description of the Plan. The Employee
understands that the Plan is discretionary in nature and may be amended, suspended or terminated by
the Company at any time.
24. Labor Law. By accepting this Performance Shares award, the Employee acknowledges
that: (a) the grant of these Performance Shares is a one-time benefit which does not create any
contractual or other right to receive future grants of Performance Shares, or benefits in
-9-
lieu of Performance Shares; (b) all determinations with respect to any future grants,
including, but not limited to, the times when the Performance Shares will be granted, the number of
Performance Shares subject to each Performance Share award and the time or times when the
Performance Shares will vest, shall be at the sole discretion of the Company; (c) the Employees
participation in the Plan is voluntary; (d) the value of these Performance Shares is an
extraordinary item of compensation which is outside the scope of the Employees employment
contract, if any; (e) these Performance Shares are not part of the Employees normal or expected
compensation for purposes of calculating any severance, resignation, redundancy, end of service
payments, bonuses, long-service awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments; (f) the
vesting of these Performance Shares shall cease upon termination of employment for any reason
except as may otherwise be explicitly provided in the Plan or this Agreement; (g) the future value
of the underlying Shares is unknown and cannot be predicted with certainty; (h) these Performance
Shares have been granted to the Employee in the Employees status as an employee of the Company or
its Affiliates; (i) any claims resulting from these Performance Shares will be enforceable, if at
all, against the Company; and (j) there shall be no additional obligations for any Affiliate
employing the Employee as a result of these Performance Shares.
25. Disclosure of Employee Information. By accepting this Performance Shares award,
the Employee consents to the collection, use and transfer of personal data as described in this
paragraph. The Employee understands that the Company and its Affiliates hold certain personal
information about him or her, including his or her name, home address and telephone number, date of
birth, social security or identity number, salary, nationality, job title, any shares of stock or
directorships held in the Company, details of all awards of Performance Shares or any other
entitlement to shares of stock awarded, canceled, exercised, vested, unvested or outstanding in his
or her favor, for the purpose of managing and administering the Plan (Data).
The Employee further understands that the Company and/or its Affiliates will transfer Data
among themselves as necessary for the purpose of implementation, administration and management of
his or her participation in the Plan, and that the Company and/or any of its Affiliates may each
further transfer Data to any third parties assisting the Company in the implementation,
administration and management of the Plan. The Employee understands that these recipients may be
located in the European Economic Area, or elsewhere, such as in the U.S. or Asia.
The Employee authorizes the Company to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data in
electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering and managing his or her
participation in the Plan, including any requisite transfer to a broker or other third party with
whom he or she may elect to deposit any Shares of stock acquired from this award of Performance
Shares of such Data as may be required for the administration of the Plan and/or the subsequent
holding of Shares of stock on his or her behalf. The Employee understands that he or she may, at
any time, view the Data, require any necessary amendments to the Data or withdraw the consent
herein in writing by contacting the Human Resources department and/or the Stock Programs
Administrator for the Company and/or its applicable Affiliates. The Employee understands, however,
that refusing or withdrawing the Employees consent may affect the Employees ability to
participate in the Plan. For more information on the consequences of the Employees refusal to
consent or withdrawal of consent, the Employee understands that he or she may contact the
Employees local Human Resources representative.
-10-
26. Notice
of Governing Law. This award of Performance Shares will be governed by,
and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California, in the U.S.A., without
regard to principles of conflict of laws.
oOo
-11-
exv10w72
Exhibit 10.72
[EMPL_NAME]
Employee ID: [EMPLID]
Grant Number: [GRANT_ID]
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
NOTICE OF GRANT
Applied Materials, Inc. (the Company) hereby grants you, [EMPL_NAME] (the Employee), an
award of Restricted Stock under the Companys Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan). The date
of this Restricted Stock Agreement (the Agreement) is [GRANT_DT] (the Grant Date). Subject to
the provisions of Appendix A (attached) which constitutes part of this Agreement, and of the Plan,
the principal features of this grant are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of Restricted Stock:
[Number]
|
|
Purchase Price per Share:
|
|
US $0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled Vesting Dates/Period of Restriction:
|
|
Number of Shares:
|
|
[MAX_SHARES] |
|
|
|
|
|
[VESTING SCHEDULE and/or PERFORMANCE VESTING
CONDITIONS]*
|
|
[Number] |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Except as otherwise provided as otherwise provided in Appendix A, the
Employee will not vest in the Shares of Restricted Stock unless he is employed by the Company or
one of its Affiliates through the applicable vesting date. |
IMPORTANT:
Your electronic or written signature below indicates your agreement to purchase the Shares
and your understanding that this grant is subject to all of the terms and conditions contained in
Appendix A and the Plan. For example, important additional information on vesting and forfeiture
of the Shares covered by this grant is contained in paragraphs 3 through 6 of Appendix A. PLEASE
BE SURE TO READ ALL OF APPENDIX A, WHICH CONTAINS SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS GRANT.
EMPLOYEE
[NAME]
Date: ___________, 20__
Please be sure to retain a copy of your signed Agreement; you may obtain a paper copy at any time
and at the Companys expense by requesting one from Stock Programs (see paragraph 11 below).
Please sign a paper copy of the Agreement and deliver it to Stock Programs.
APPENDIX A
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT
1. Grant. Applied Materials, Inc. (the Company) hereby grants to the Employee under
the Companys Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the Plan) the number of Shares of Restricted Stock
set forth on the first page of the Notice of Grant of this Agreement for $0.01 per Share,
commencing on the Grant Date, subject to all of the terms and conditions in this Agreement and the
Plan. Upon this grant of Restricted Stock, the par value purchase price for each share of
Restricted Stock will be deemed paid by the Employee by past services rendered by the Employee and
will be subject to the appropriate tax withholdings. Only whole shares will be issued.
2. Shares Held in Escrow. The Shares will be issued in the name of the Employee, and
unless and until the Shares will have vested in the manner set forth in paragraphs 3 through 5 or
paragraph 10, the Shares will be held by the Stock Programs Department of the Company (or its
designee) as escrow agent (the Escrow Agent), and will not be sold, transferred or otherwise
disposed of, and will not be pledged or otherwise hypothecated. The Company may determine to issue
the Shares in book entry form and/or may instruct the transfer agent for its Common Stock to place
a legend on the certificate or certificates representing the Restricted Stock or otherwise note in
its records as to the restrictions on transfer set forth in this Agreement and the Plan. The
Shares, which may be issued in certificate or book entry form, will not be delivered by the Escrow
Agent to the Employee unless and until the Shares have vested and all other terms and conditions in
this Agreement have been satisfied.
3. Vesting Schedule/Period of Restriction. Except as provided in paragraphs 4, 5 and
10, and subject to paragraph 6, the Shares awarded by this Agreement will vest in accordance with
the vesting provisions set forth on the first page of this Agreement. Shares will not vest in the
Employee in accordance with any of the provisions of this Agreement unless the Employee will have
been continuously employed by the Company or by one of its Affiliates from the Grant Date until the
date vesting otherwise is scheduled to occur.
4. Modifications to Vesting Schedule.
(a) Vesting upon Personal Leave of Absence. In the event that the Employee takes a personal
leave of absence (PLOA), the Shares awarded by this Agreement that are scheduled to vest will be
modified as follows:
(i) if the duration of the Employees PLOA is six (6) months or less, the vesting schedule set
forth on the first page of this Agreement will not be affected by the Employees PLOA.
(ii) if the duration of the Employees PLOA is greater than six (6) months but not more than
twelve (12) months, the scheduled vesting of any Shares awarded by this Agreement that are not then
vested will be deferred for a period of time equal to the duration of the Employees PLOA less six
(6) months.
3
(iii) if the duration of the Employees PLOA is greater than twelve (12) months, any Shares
awarded by this Agreement that are not then vested will immediately terminate.
(iv) Example 1. Employee is scheduled to vest in Shares on January 1, 2007. On May 1, 2006,
Employee begins a six-month PLOA. Employees Shares will still be scheduled to vest on January 1,
2007.
(v) Example 2. Employee is scheduled to vest in Shares on January 1, 2007. On May 1, 2006,
Employee begins a nine-month PLOA. Employees Shares awarded by this Agreement that are scheduled
to vest after November 2, 2006 will be modified (this is the date on which the Employees PLOA
exceeds six (6) months). Employees Shares now will be scheduled to vest on April 1, 2007 (three
(3) months after the originally scheduled date).
(vi) Example 3. Employee is scheduled to vest in Shares on January 1, 2007. On May 1, 2006,
Employee begins a 13-month PLOA. Employees Shares will terminate on May 2, 2007.
In general, a personal leave of absence does not include any legally required leave of
absence. The duration of the Employees PLOA will be determined over a rolling twelve- (12-) month
measurement period. Shares awarded by this Agreement that are scheduled to vest during the first
six (6) months of the Employees PLOA will continue to vest as scheduled. However, Shares awarded
by this Agreement that are scheduled to vest after the first six (6) months of the Employees PLOA
will be deferred or terminated depending on the length of the Employees PLOA. The Employees right
to vest in Shares awarded by this Agreement will be modified as soon as the duration of the
Employees PLOA exceeds six (6) months.
(b) Death of Employee. In the event that the Employee incurs a Termination of Service due to
his or her death, one hundred percent (100%) of the Shares subject to this Restricted Stock award
shall vest on the date of the Employees death. In the event that any applicable law limits the
Companys ability to accelerate the vesting of this award of Restricted Stock, this paragraph 4(b)
will be limited to the extent required to comply with applicable law. If the Employee is subject to
Hong Kongs ORSO provisions, this paragraph 4(b) will not apply to this award of Restricted Stock.
5. Committee Discretion. The Committee, in its discretion, may accelerate the vesting
of the balance, or some lesser portion of the balance, of the unvested Shares at any time, subject
to the terms of the Plan. If so accelerated, such Shares will be considered as having vested as of
the date specified by the Committee.
6. Forfeiture. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this Agreement and except in
the event of Employees death (see paragraph 4(b)), the balance of the Shares that have not vested
at the time of the Employees Termination of Service will be forfeited and automatically
transferred to and reacquired by the Company at no cost to the Company upon the date the Employee
incurs a Termination of Service for any reason. The Employee will not be entitled to a refund of
the price paid for the Shares returned to the Company pursuant to this paragraph 6. The Employee
hereby
4
appoints the Escrow Agent with full power of substitution, as the Employees true and lawful
attorney-in-fact with irrevocable power and authority in the name and on behalf of the Employee to
take any action and execute all documents and instruments, including, without limitation, stock
powers which may be necessary to transfer the certificate or certificates evidencing such unvested
Shares to the Company upon such Termination of Service. [To be included for Awards subject to
performance-based vesting: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan or this Agreement,
the Board, in its sole discretion, may require the Employee to forfeit, return or reimburse the
Company all or a portion of the Shares in accordance with paragraph 15 of the Agreement.]
7. Withholding of Taxes. The Company (or the employing Affiliate) will withhold a
portion of the Shares that have an aggregate market value sufficient to pay all taxes and social
insurance liability and other requirements in connection with the Shares, including, without
limitation, (a) all federal, state and local income, employment and any other applicable taxes that
are required to be withheld by the Company or the employing Affiliate, (b) the Employees and, to
the extent required by the Company (or the employing Affiliate), the Companys (or the employing
Affiliates) fringe benefit tax liability, if any, associated with the grant, vesting, or sale of
the Award and the Shares issued thereunder, and (c) all other taxes or social insurance liabilities
with respect to which the Employee has agreed to bear responsibility (together, the Tax
Obligations). The number of Shares withheld pursuant to the prior sentence will be rounded up to
the nearest whole Share, with no refund for any value of the Shares withheld in excess of the Tax
Obligation as a result of such rounding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company, in its sole
discretion, may require the Employee to make alternate arrangements satisfactory to the Company for
such withholdings or remittances in advance of the arising of any remittance obligations to which
the Employee has agreed or any withholding obligations.
Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this Agreement, no Shares will be issued unless and
until satisfactory arrangements (as determined by the Company) will have been made by the Employee
with respect to the payment of any income and other taxes which the Company determines must be
withheld or collected with respect to such Shares. In addition and to the maximum extent permitted
by law, the Company (or the employing Affiliate) has the right to retain without notice from salary
or other amounts payable to the Employee, cash having a sufficient value to satisfy any Tax
Obligations that the Company determines cannot be satisfied through the withholding of otherwise
deliverable Shares or that are due prior to the issuance of Shares under the Restricted Stock
award. All Tax Obligations related to the Restricted Stock award and any Shares delivered in
payment thereof are the sole responsibility of the Employee. Further, the Employee shall be bound
by any additional withholding requirements included in the Notice of Grant of this Agreement.
8. Rights as Stockholder. Neither the Employee nor any person claiming under or
through the Employee will have any of the rights or privileges of a stockholder of the Company in
respect of any Shares deliverable hereunder unless and until such Shares will have been issued
(which may be in certificate or book entry form), recorded on the records of the Company or its
transfer agents or registrars, and delivered (including through electronic delivery to a brokerage
account) to the Employee or the Escrow Agent. Except as provided in paragraph 10, after such
5
issuance, recordation and delivery, the Employee will have all the rights of a stockholder of
the Company with respect to voting such Shares. Notwithstanding any contrary provisions in this
Agreement, any quarterly or other regular, periodic dividends (as determined by the Company) paid
on unvested Shares will be forfeited by the Employee and automatically returned to the Company.
The Company will be entitled to receive any dividends and/or distributions on any Shares held by
the Escrow Agent until such Shares have vested in the manner set forth in paragraphs 3 through 5 or
paragraph 10.
9. No Effect on Employment. Subject to any employment contract with the Employee, the
terms of such employment will be determined from time to time by the Company, or the Affiliate
employing the Employee, as the case may be, and the Company, or the Affiliate employing the
Employee, as the case may be, will have the right, which is hereby expressly reserved, to terminate
or change the terms of the employment of the Employee at any time for any reason whatsoever, with
or without good cause. The transactions contemplated hereunder and the vesting schedule set forth
on the first page of this Agreement do not constitute an express or implied promise of continued
employment for any period of time. A leave of absence or an interruption in service (including an
interruption during military service) authorized or acknowledged by the Company or the Affiliate
employing the Employee, as the case may be, will not be deemed a Termination of Service for the
purposes of this Agreement.
10. Changes in Shares. In the event that as a result of a stock or extraordinary cash
dividend, stock split, distribution, reclassification, recapitalization, combination of shares or
the adjustment in capital stock of the Company or otherwise, or as a result of a merger,
consolidation, spin-off or other corporate transaction or event, the Shares will be increased,
reduced or otherwise affected, and by virtue of any such event the Employee will in his or her
capacity as owner of unvested Shares which have been awarded to him or her (the Prior Shares) be
entitled to new or additional or different shares of stock, cash or other securities or property
(other than rights or warrants to purchase securities); such new or additional or different shares,
cash or securities or property will thereupon be considered to be unvested Restricted Stock and
will be subject to all of the conditions and restrictions that were applicable to the Prior Shares
pursuant to this Agreement and the Plan. If the Employee receives rights or warrants with respect
to any Prior Shares, such rights or warrants may be held or exercised by the Employee, provided
that until such exercise, any such rights or warrants, and after such exercise, any shares or other
securities acquired by the exercise of such rights or warrants will be considered to be unvested
Restricted Stock and will be subject to all of the conditions and restrictions which were
applicable to the Prior Shares pursuant to the Plan and this Agreement. The Committee in its sole
discretion at any time may accelerate the vesting of all or any portion of such new or additional
shares of Restricted Stock, cash or securities, rights or warrants to purchase securities or shares
or other securities acquired by the exercise of such rights or warrants.
11. Address for Notices. Any notice to be given to the Company under the terms of
this Agreement will be addressed to the Company, in care of Stock Programs, at Applied Materials,
Inc., 2881 Scott Boulevard, M/S 2023, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95050, or at such other
address as the Company may hereafter designate in writing.
6
12. Grant is Not Transferable. Except to the limited extent provided in this
Agreement, the unvested Shares subject to this grant and the rights and privileges conferred hereby
will not be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated in any way (whether by operation of law
or otherwise) and will not be subject to sale under execution, attachment or similar process. Upon
any attempt to transfer, assign, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of any unvested Shares
subject to this grant, or any right or privilege conferred hereby, or upon any attempted sale under
any execution, attachment or similar process, this grant and the rights and privileges conferred
hereby immediately will become null and void.
13. Restrictions on Sale of Securities. The Shares issued under this Agreement will
be registered under U.S. federal securities laws and will be freely tradable upon receipt following
vesting. However, an Employees subsequent sale of the Shares may be subject to any market
blackout-period that may be imposed by the Company and must comply with the Companys insider
trading policies, and any other applicable securities laws.
14. Binding Agreement. Subject to the limitation on the transferability of this grant
contained herein, this Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs,
legatees, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
15. [To be included for Awards subject to performance-based vesting: Clawback in
Connection with a Material Negative Financial Restatement. Pursuant to the Companys clawback
policy, the Board, in its sole discretion, may require the Employee to forfeit, return or reimburse
the Company all or a portion of his or her Shares subject to this Award if (i) the Employee is or
was a Section 16 Person during the performance period applicable to the performance-based vesting
of the Shares, and (ii) the Employee deliberately engaged in Intentional Misconduct (as defined
below) that was determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, to be the primary cause of a
material negative restatement of a Company financial statement that was filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission and such financial statement, as originally filed, is one of the
Companys three (3) most recently filed annual financial statements. The portion of the Shares, if
any, that the Employee may be required to forfeit, return or reimburse will be determined by the
Board, in its sole discretion, but will be no more than the Clawback Maximum (as defined below).
For purposes of this Agreement, Clawback Maximum means the portion of the Award that was in
excess of the Shares in which the Employee would have vested had the Companys financial results
been calculated under the restated financial statements.
To the extent Tax Obligations on such Shares were paid or due, such forfeiture, return or
reimbursement shall be limited to the after-tax portion of the Clawback Maximum.
For purposes of this Agreement, Intentional Misconduct means the Employees deliberate
engagement in any one or more of the following: (a) fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement or any
other act or acts of similar gravity resulting or intended to result directly or indirectly in
substantial personal enrichment to the Employee at the expense of the Company; (b) a material
violation of a federal, state or local law or regulation applicable to the Companys business that
has a significant negative effect on the Companys financial results; or (c) a material breach of
the Employees
7
fiduciary duty owed to the Company that has a significant negative effect on the Companys
financial results; provided, however, that the Employees exercise of judgment or actions (or
abstention from action), and/or decision-making will not constitute Intentional Misconduct if such
judgment, action (or abstention from action) and/or decision is, in the good faith determination of
the Board, reasonable based on the facts and circumstances known to the Employee at the time of
such judgment, action (or abstention from action) and/or decision; and such judgment, action (or
abstention from action) and/or decision is in an area or situation in which (i) discretion must be
exercised by the Employee or (ii) differing views or opinions may apply.]
16. Additional Conditions to Release from Escrow. The Company will not be required to
issue Shares hereunder (in certificate or book entry form) or release such Shares from the escrow
established pursuant to paragraph 2 prior to fulfillment of all the following conditions: (a) the
admission of such Shares to listing on all stock exchanges on which such class of stock is then
listed; (b) the completion of any registration or other qualification of such Shares under any U.S.
state or federal law or under the rulings or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
or any other governmental regulatory body, which the Committee will, in its sole discretion, deem
necessary or advisable; (c) the obtaining of any approval or other clearance from any U.S. state or
federal governmental agency, which the Committee will, in its sole discretion, determine to be
necessary or advisable; and (d) the lapse of such reasonable period of time following the date of
grant of the Restricted Stock as the Committee may establish from time to time for reasons of
administrative convenience.
17. Plan Governs. This Agreement is subject to all the terms and provisions of the
Plan. In the event of a conflict between one or more provisions of this Agreement and one or more
provisions of the Plan, the provisions of the Plan will govern. Capitalized terms used and not
defined in this Agreement will have the meaning set forth in the Plan.
18. Committee Authority. The Committee will have the power to interpret the Plan and
this Agreement and to adopt such rules for the administration, interpretation and application of
the Plan as are consistent therewith and to interpret or revoke any such rules (including, but not
limited to, the determination of whether or not any Shares have vested). All actions taken and all
interpretations and determinations made by the Committee in good faith will be final and binding
upon the Employee, the Company and all other interested persons. No member of the Committee will
be personally liable for any action, determination or interpretation made in good faith with
respect to the Plan or this Agreement.
19. Captions. Captions provided herein are for convenience only and are not to serve
as a basis for interpretation or construction of this Agreement.
20. Agreement Severable. In the event that any provision in this Agreement will be
held invalid or unenforceable, such provision will be severable from, and such invalidity or
unenforceability will not be construed to have any effect on, the remaining provisions of this
Agreement.
8
21. Modifications to the Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire
understanding of the parties on the subjects covered. The Employee expressly warrants that he or
she is not accepting this Agreement in reliance on any promises, representations, or inducements
other than those contained herein. Modifications to this Agreement or the Plan can be made only in
an express written contract executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company.
22. Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan. By accepting this Restricted
Stock award, the Employee expressly warrants that he or she has received a Restricted Stock award
under the Plan, and has received, read and understood a description of the Plan. The Employee
understands that the Plan is discretionary in nature and may be amended, suspended or terminated by
the Company at any time.
23. Labor Law. By accepting this Restricted Stock award, the Employee acknowledges
that: (a) the grant of this Restricted Stock is a one-time benefit which does not create any
contractual or other right to receive future grants of Restricted Stock, or benefits in lieu of
Restricted Stock; (b) all determinations with respect to any future grants, including, but not
limited to, the times when the Restricted Stock will be granted, the number of Shares subject to
each Restricted Stock award, the Purchase Price per Share, and the time or times when Restricted
Stock will vest, shall be at the sole discretion of the Company; (c) the Employees participation
in the Plan is voluntary; (d) the value of this Restricted Stock is an extraordinary item of
compensation which is outside the scope of the Employees employment contract, if any; (e) this
Restricted Stock is not part of the Employees normal or expected compensation for purposes of
calculating any severance, resignation, redundancy, end of service payments, bonuses, long-service
awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments; (f) the vesting of the Shares shall
cease upon termination of employment for any reason except as may otherwise be explicitly provided
in the Plan or this Agreement; (g) the future value of the underlying Shares is unknown and cannot
be predicted with certainty; (h) this Restricted Stock has been granted to the Employee in the
Employees status as an employee of the Company or its Affiliates; (i) any claims resulting from
this Restricted Stock will be enforceable, if at all, against the Company; and (j) there will be no
additional obligations for any Affiliate employing the Employee as a result of this Restricted
Stock.
24. Disclosure of Employee Information. By accepting this Restricted Stock award, the
Employee consents to the collection, use and transfer of personal data as described in this
paragraph. The Employee understands that the Company and its Affiliates hold certain personal
information about him or her, including his or her name, home address and telephone number, date of
birth, social security or identity number, salary, nationality, job title, any shares of stock or
directorships held in the Company, details of all awards of Restricted Stock or any other
entitlement to shares of stock awarded, canceled, exercised, vested, unvested or outstanding in his
or her favor, for the purpose of managing and administering the Plan (Data). The Employee further
understands that the Company and/or its Affiliates will transfer Data among themselves as necessary
for the purpose of implementation, administration and management of his or her participation in the
Plan, and that the Company and/or any of its Affiliates may each further transfer Data to any third
parties assisting the Company in the implementation, administration and management of the Plan. The
Employee
9
understands that these recipients may be located in the European Economic Area, or elsewhere,
such as in the U.S. or Asia.
The Employee authorizes the Company to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data in
electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering and managing his or her
participation in the Plan, including any requisite transfer to a broker or other third party with
whom he or she may elect to deposit any Shares of stock acquired from this award of Restricted
Stock of such Data as may be required for the administration of the Plan and/or the subsequent
holding of Shares of stock on his or her behalf. The Employee understands that he or she may, at
any time, view the Data, require any necessary amendments to the Data or withdraw the consent
herein in writing by contacting the Human Resources Department and/or the Stock Programs
Administrator for the Company and/or its applicable Affiliates. The Employee understands, however,
that refusing or withdrawing the Employees consent may affect the Employees ability to
participate in the Plan. For more information on the consequences of the Employees refusal to
consent or withdrawal of consent, the Employee understands that he or she may contact the
Employees local Human Resources representative.
25. Notice of Governing Law. This award of Restricted Stock will be governed by, and
construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California, U.S.A., without regard to
principles of conflict of laws.
o O o
10
exv31w1
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Michael R. Splinter, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Applied Materials, Inc.; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: June 9, 2010
|
|
|
/s/ Michael R. Splinter
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Splinter |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv31w2
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, George S. Davis, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Applied Materials, Inc.; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: June 9, 2010
|
|
|
/s/ George S. Davis
|
|
|
|
|
|
George S. Davis |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
exv32w1
EXHIBIT 32.1
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Applied Materials, Inc. for the period
ended May 2, 2010, I, Michael R. Splinter, President and Chief Executive Officer of Applied
Materials, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. |
|
the Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
2. |
|
the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2010 fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Applied
Materials, Inc. for the periods presented therein. |
Date: June 9, 2010
|
|
|
/s/ Michael R. Splinter
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael R. Splinter |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
exv32w2
EXHIBIT 32.2
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Applied Materials, Inc. for the period
ended May 2, 2010, I, George S. Davis, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Applied
Materials, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. |
|
the Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
2. |
|
the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2010 fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Applied
Materials, Inc. for the periods presented therein. |
Date: June 9, 2010
|
|
|
/s/ George S. Davis
|
|
|
|
|
|
George S. Davis |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|
|