View Filing Data

Document and Company Information - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
Document and Company Information - USD ($)	Jan. 31, 2010	Apr. 26, 2009
Document and Company Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	APPLIED MATERIALS INC /DE
Entity Central Index Key	0000006951
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jan. 31, 2010
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--10-31
Entity Well Known Seasoned Issuer	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Public Float (actual number)		$ 15,579,209,892
Entity Common Stock Shares Outstanding (actual number)	1,343,270,238

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - USD ($) shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2010	Jan. 25, 2009
Statements of Operations
Net sales	$ 1,848,902	$ 1,333,396
Cost of products sold	1,137,718	941,820
Gross margin	711,184	391,576
Operating expenses:
Research, development and engineering	269,003	229,540
General and administrative	124,799	141,241
Marketing and selling	97,195	84,115
Restructuring and asset impairments	103,844	132,772
Income (loss) from operations	116,343	(196,092)
Pretax loss of equity-method investment		15,808
Impairment of investments	1,190
Interest expense	5,060	5,994
Interest income	8,641	15,235
Income (loss) before income taxes	118,734	(202,659)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	35,983	(69,725)
Net income (loss)	$ 82,751	$ (132,934)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$ 0.06	$ (0.1)
Diluted	$ 0.06	$ (0.1)
Weighted average number of shares:
Basic	1,341,941	1,329,223
Diluted	1,349,567	1,329,223

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets - USD ($)
$ in Thousands

Jan. 31, 2010

^[1]

Oct. 25, 2009

^[2]

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 1,399,054

$ 1,576,381

Short-term investments

755,122

638,349

Accounts receivable, net

1,267,409

1,041,495

Inventories

1,664,269

1,627,457

Deferred income taxes, net

417,986

356,336

Income taxes receivable

102,711

184,760

Other current assets

242,712

264,169

Total current assets

5,849,263

5,688,947

Long-term investments

1,046,116

1,052,165

Property, plant and equipment

2,964,028

2,906,957

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

(1,835,359)

(1,816,524)

Net property, plant and equipment

1,128,669

1,090,433

Goodwill, net

1,336,426

1,170,932

Purchased technology and other intangible assets, net

374,000

306,416

Deferred income taxes and other assets

269,364

265,350

Total assets

10,003,838

9,574,243

Current liabilities:

Current portion of long-term debt

2,400

1,240

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

1,252,031

1,061,502

Customer deposits and deferred revenue

993,357

864,280

Income taxes payable

30,160

12,435

Total current liabilities

2,277,948

1,939,457

Long-term debt

210,547

200,654

Other liabilities

367,200

339,524

Total liabilities

2,855,695

2,479,635

Stockholders' equity:

Common stock

13,433

13,409

Additional paid-in capital

5,245,634

5,195,437

Retained earnings

10,936,149

10,934,004

Treasury stock

(9,046,562)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(511)

(1,680)

Total stockholders' equity

7,148,143

7,094,608

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$ 10,003,838

$ 9,574,243

[1]	Amounts as of January 31, 2010 are unaudited.
[2]	Amounts as of October 25, 2009 are derived from the October 25, 2009 audited consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - USD ($)
$ in Thousands

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Jan. 25, 2009

Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income (loss)

$ 82,751

$ (132,934)

Adjustments required to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

76,412

71,228

Loss on fixed asset retirements

3,435

3,447

Provision for bad debts

6,000

47,526

Restructuring and asset impairments

103,844

132,772

Deferred income taxes

(43,636)

(13,054)

Net recognized loss on investments

5,185

5,398

Pretax loss of equity-method investment

15,808

Impairment of investments

1,190

Equity-based compensation

33,689

33,608

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of amounts acquired:

Accounts receivable

(193,953)

368,648

Inventories

25,026

(144,075)

Other current assets

23,260

10,890

Other assets

(9,525)

1,311

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

42,290

(353,672)

Customer deposits and deferred revenue

123,218

(164,701)

Income taxes

99,864

(94,337)

Other liabilities

(7,177)

26,920

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities

371,873

(185,217)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Capital expenditures

(53,167)

(73,318)

Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired

(322,599)

Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments

183,881

541,689

Purchases of investments

(297,683)

(227,348)

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities

(489,568)

241,023

Cash flows from financing activities:

Debt borrowings

977

510

Proceeds from common stock issuances

19,855

182

Common stock repurchases

(22,906)

Payment of dividends to stockholders

(80,464)

(79,762)

Cash used in financing activities

(59,632)

(101,976)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

742

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(177,327)

(45,428)

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period

1,576,381

^[1]

1,411,624

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period

1,399,054

^[2]

1,366,196

Supplemental cash flow information:

Cash payments (refunds) for income taxes

(32,791)

12,064

Cash payments for interest

$ 42

[1]	Amounts as of October 25, 2009 are derived from the October 25, 2009 audited consolidated financial statements.
[2]	Amounts as of January 31, 2010 are unaudited.

Basis of Presentation

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Basis of Presentation [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation


Note 1	Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements of Applied Materials, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Applied or the Company) included herein have been prepared on a basis consistent with the October 25, 2009 audited consolidated financial statements and include all material adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly present the information set forth therein. These unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Applied’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 25, 2009 (2009 Form 10-K). Applied’s results of operations for the three months ended January 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of future operating results.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Applied’s fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in October of each year. Fiscal 2010 contains 53 weeks, while fiscal 2009 contained 52 weeks, and the first fiscal quarter of 2010 contained 14 weeks, while the first fiscal quarter of 2009 contained 13 weeks.

Revenue Recognition

Applied recognizes revenue when all four revenue recognition criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; seller’s price to buyer is fixed or determinable; and collectability is probable. Applied’s shipping terms are customarily FOB Applied shipping point or equivalent terms. Applied’s revenue recognition policy generally results in revenue recognition at the following points: (1) for all transactions where legal title passes to the customer upon shipment, Applied recognizes revenue upon shipment for all products that have been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to shipment; the portion of revenue associated with certain installation-related tasks is deferred, and that revenue is recognized upon completion of the installation-related tasks; (2) for products that have not been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to shipment, revenue is recognized at customer technical acceptance; (3) for transactions where legal title does not pass at shipment, revenue is recognized when legal title passes to the customer, which is generally at customer technical acceptance; (4) for arrangements initiated prior to fiscal 2010 containing multiple elements, the revenue relating to the undelivered elements is deferred at their estimated relative fair values until delivery of the deferred elements; and (5) for arrangements initiated or materially modified during fiscal 2010 containing multiple elements, the revenue relating to the undelivered elements is deferred using the relative selling price method utilizing estimated sales prices until delivery of the deferred elements. Applied limits the amount of revenue recognition for delivered elements to the amount that is not contingent on the future delivery of products or services, future performance obligations or subject to customer-specified return or adjustment. In cases where Applied has sold products that have been demonstrated to meet product specifications prior to shipment, Applied believes that at the time of delivery, it has an enforceable claim to amounts recognized as revenue. The completed contract method is used for SunFab^tm thin film lines. Certain SunFab thin film contracts have provisions for additional amounts to become due to Applied if the line achieves certain output criteria subsequent to factory acceptance. Any additional amounts earned under these contracts are recognized upon achievement. Spare parts revenue is generally recognized upon shipment, and services revenue is generally recognized over the period that the services are provided.

In fiscal 2010, Applied elected to early adopt amended accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements on a prospective basis for applicable transactions originating or materially modified after October 25, 2009. The new standard changes the requirements for establishing separate units of accounting in a multiple element arrangement and requires the allocation of arrangement consideration to each deliverable to be based on the relative selling price. The FASB also amended the accounting standards for revenue recognition to exclude software that is contained in a tangible product from the scope of software revenue guidance if the software is essential to the tangible product’s functionality. Implementation of this new authoritative guidance had an insignificant impact on reported net sales as compared to net sales under previous guidance, as the new guidance did not change the units of accounting within sales arrangements and the elimination of the residual method for the allocation of arrangement consideration had an inconsequential impact on the amount and timing of reported net sales. Accordingly, Applied does not believe that the effect of adopting these standards will have a material impact on future financial periods.

For fiscal 2010 and future periods, when a sales arrangement contains multiple elements, such as hardware and services and/or software products, Applied allocates revenue to each element based on a selling price hierarchy. The selling price for a deliverable is based on its vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) if available, third party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price (ESP) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Applied generally utilizes the ESP due to the nature of its products. In multiple element arrangements where more-than-incidental software deliverables are included, revenue is allocated to each separate unit of accounting for each of the non-software deliverables and to the software deliverables as a group using the relative selling prices of each of the deliverables in the arrangement based on the aforementioned selling price hierarchy. If the arrangement contains more than one software deliverable, the arrangement consideration allocated to the software deliverables as a group is then allocated to each software deliverable using the guidance for recognizing software revenue, as amended.

Business Combinations

Effective in fiscal 2010, Applied adopted revised authoritative guidance on business combinations that covers the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for preacquisition gain and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition-related transaction costs, and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance. This authoritative guidance also revised the accounting for both increases and decreases in a parent’s controlling ownership interest.

Equity-Based Compensation

Applied has adopted stock plans that permit grants to employees of equity-based awards, including stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units (also referred to as “performance shares” under the Applied Materials, Inc. Employee Stock Incentive Plan). In addition, the Employee Stock Incentive Plan provides for the automatic grant of restricted stock units to non-employee directors and permits the grant of equity-based awards to consultants. Applied also has two Employee Stock Purchase Plans, one for United States employees and a second for international employees (collectively, ESPP), which enable eligible employees to purchase Applied common stock.

During each of the three months ended January 31, 2010 and January 25, 2009, Applied recognized total equity-based compensation expense related to stock options, ESPP shares, restricted stock units and restricted stock of $34 million. The equity-based compensation expense related to restricted stock units and restricted stock for the three months ended January 31, 2010 and January 25, 2009 was $25 million and $32 million, respectively. During each of the three months ended January 31, 2010 and January 25, 2009, Applied recognized income tax benefits related to equity-based compensation of $9 million. The cost associated with Applied’s stock options and restricted stock units, less expected forfeitures, is recognized over the awards’ service period for the entire award on a straight- line basis. The cost associated with Applied’s performance-based equity awards is recognized over the service period for each tranche.

Stock Options

The exercise price of each stock option equals the fair market value of Applied common stock on the date of grant. Most options are scheduled to vest over four years and expire no later than seven years from the grant date. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This model was developed for use in estimating the value of publicly traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Applied’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of publicly traded options.

There were no stock options granted in the three months ended January 31, 2010 or January 25, 2009.

Employee Stock Purchase Plans

Under the ESPP, substantially all employees may purchase Applied common stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of Applied common stock at the beginning or at the end of each 6-month purchase period. No shares were issued under the ESPP during the three months ended January 31, 2010 or January 25, 2009. Compensation expense associated with the ESPP is calculated using the fair value of the employees’ purchase rights under the Black-Scholes model.

Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock

Restricted stock units are converted into shares of Applied common stock upon vesting on a one-for-one basis. Restricted stock units typically vest over three to four years. Vesting of restricted stock units usually is subject to the grantee’s continued service with Applied. The compensation expense related to these awards is determined using the fair market value of Applied common stock on the date of the grant, and the compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period. Restricted stock has the same rights of other issued and outstanding shares of Applied common stock except these shares have no rights to dividends and are held in escrow until the grantee’s performance goals are achieved. At January 31, 2010, Applied had $225 million total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to restricted stock unit grants, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years. There were 9,508,000 and 214,000 restricted stock units granted in the three months ended January 31, 2010 and January 25, 2009, respectively.

Beginning in fiscal 2007, Applied initiated a performance-based equity award program for named executive officers and other key employees. These awards vest only if specific performance goals set by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of Applied’s Board of Directors (the Committee) are achieved and if the grantee remains employed by Applied through the applicable vesting date. The performance goals require the achievement of targeted relative annual operating profit margin levels as compared to Applied’s peer companies in at least one of the four fiscal years beginning with the fiscal year of the grant. The fair value of the performance-based restricted stock units and restricted stock is estimated using the fair market value of Applied common stock on the date of the grant and assumes that the performance goals will be achieved. If achieved, the award vests over a specified remaining service period. If the performance goals are not met, no compensation expense is recognized and any previously recognized compensation expense is reversed. The expected cost of each award is reflected over the service period and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Committee approved the grant of 1,775,000 performance-based restricted stock units and 50,000 performance-based shares of restricted stock under this program in the three months ended January 31, 2010. There were no performance-based awards granted in the three months ended January 25, 2009. As of January 31, 2010, 70% of the performance goals associated with the performance-based awards granted in fiscal 2008 were achieved. The performance goals associated with the remaining 30% may still be achieved during fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011.

Investments

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Investments [Abstract]

Investments


Note 4	Investments

Summary of Investments

The following tables summarizes Applied’s investments by security type:


			Gross		Gross
			Unrealized		Unrealized		Estimated
January 31, 2010	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
			(In thousands)

U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	710,523	$	8,534	$	107	$	718,950
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		444,885		7,757		23		452,619
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes		396,606		7,104		42		403,668
Other debt securities*		136,064		1,629		663		137,030

Total fixed income securities		1,688,078		25,024		835		1,712,267
Publicly traded equity securities		10,569		10,420		—		20,989
Equity investments in privately-held companies		67,982		—		—		67,982

Total	$	1,766,629	$	35,444	$	835	$	1,801,238


			Gross		Gross
			Unrealized		Unrealized		Estimated
October 25, 2009	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
			(In thousands)

U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	653,627	$	8,013	$	170	$	661,470
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		419,640		7,597		—		427,237
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes		382,550		5,676		281		387,945
Other debt securities*		103,193		1,430		391		104,232

Total fixed income securities		1,559,010		22,716		842		1,580,884
Publicly traded equity securities		9,572		9,439		—		19,011
Equity investments in privately-held companies		90,619		—		—		90,619

Total	$	1,659,201	$	32,155	$	842	$	1,690,514


*		Other debt securities consist primarily of investment grade asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities.

Included in cash and cash equivalents are investments in money market funds totaling $0.9 billion at January 31, 2010 and $1.2 billion at October 25, 2009.

Maturities of Investments

The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of Applied’s investments at January 31, 2010:


			Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)

Due in one year or less	$	730,222	$	734,133
Due after one through five years		813,518		832,159
Due after five years		8,274		8,945
No single maturity date**		214,615		226,001

	$	1,766,629	$	1,801,238


**		Securities with no single maturity date include publicly-traded and privately-held equity securities, and asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities.

Gains and Losses on Investments

Applied manages its cash equivalents and investments, excluding strategic investments, as a single portfolio of highly marketable securities that is intended to be available to meet Applied’s current cash requirements.

For the three months ended January 31, 2010, gross realized gains on sales of investments were $0.3 million and gross realized losses were $0.6 million. For the three months ended January 25, 2009, gross realized gains on sales of investments were $3.3 million and gross realized losses were $5.8 million.

At January 31, 2010, Applied had a gross unrealized loss of $0.8 million due to a decrease in the fair value of certain fixed income securities. Applied regularly reviews its investment portfolio to identify and evaluate investments that have indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in determining whether an unrealized loss is temporary, or other-than-temporary and therefore impaired, include: the length of time and extent to which fair value has been lower than the cost basis; the financial condition, credit quality and near-term prospects of the investee; and whether it is more likely than not that Applied will be required to sell the security prior to recovery. Generally, the contractual terms of investments in marketable securities do not permit settlement at prices less than the amortized cost of the investments. Applied has determined that the gross unrealized losses on its marketable securities at January 31, 2010, are temporary in nature and therefore it did not recognize any impairment of its marketable securities for the three months ended January 31, 2010. At January 31, 2010, Applied determined that certain of its equity investments in privately-held companies were other-than-temporarily impaired and, accordingly, recognized an impairment in the amount of $1.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.

The following table provides the fair market value of Applied’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of January 31, 2010.


	In Loss Position for				In Loss Position for
	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or Greater				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
					(In thousands)

U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	103,422	$	107	$	—	$	—	$	103,422	$	107
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		5,529		23		—		—		5,529		23
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes		70,537		27		946		15		71,483		42
Other debt securities		24,769		392		2,828		271		27,597		663

Total	$	204,257	$	549	$	3,774	$	286	$	208,031	$	835

Unrealized gains and temporary losses on investments classified as available-for-sale are included within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of any related tax effect. Upon realization, those amounts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to results of operations.

Fair Value Measurements

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements


Note 5	Fair Value Measurements

Effective October 27, 2008, Applied adopted authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and the fair value option for financial assets and liabilities. This authoritative guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under this authoritative guidance as the exchange price that would be received for an asset, or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price), in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

On October 26, 2009, Applied adopted the newly issued accounting standard for fair value measurements of all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities not recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Applied’s financial assets are measured and recorded at fair value, except for equity investments held in privately-held companies. These equity investments are generally accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are periodically assessed for other-than-temporary impairment when events or circumstances indicates that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred. Applied’s nonfinancial assets, such as goodwill, intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment, are recorded at cost and are assessed for impairment when an event or circumstance indicates that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred.

Fair Value Hierarchy

Applied uses the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:


	•	Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

	•	Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

	•	Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Applied’s investments are comprised primarily of debt securities that are classified as available-for-sale and recorded at their fair value. In determining the fair value of investments, Applied uses pricing information from pricing services that value securities based on quoted market prices and models that utilize observable market inputs. In the event a fair value estimate is unavailable from a pricing service, Applied generally obtains non-binding price quotes from brokers. Applied then reviews the information provided by the pricing services or brokers to determine the fair value of its short-term and long-term investments. In addition, to validate pricing information obtained from pricing services, Applied periodically performs supplemental analysis on a sample of securities. Applied reviews any significant unanticipated differences identified through this analysis to determine the appropriate fair value.

Investments with remaining effective maturities of 12 months or less from the balance sheet date are classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining effective maturities of more than 12 months from the balance sheet date are classified as long-term investments. As of January 31, 2010, a substantial majority of Applied’s available-for-sale, short-term and long-term investments were recognized at fair value that was determined based upon observable inputs.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Financial assets and liabilities (excluding cash balances) measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below as of January 31, 2010 and October 25, 2009:


	January 31, 2010										October 25, 2009
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Total
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)

Assets:
Money market funds	$	860,499	$	—		$	—	$	860,499		$	1,235,254	$	—		$	—	$	1,235,254
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		134,403		584,547			—		718,950			145,166		516,304			—		661,470
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		452,619			—		452,619			—		427,237			—		427,237
U.S. commercial paper, corporate bonds and medium-term notes		—		403,668			—		403,668			—		387,945			—		387,945
Other debt securities		—		137,030			—		137,030			—		104,232			—		104,232
Publicly traded equity securities		20,989		—			—		20,989			19,011		—			—		19,011
Foreign exchange derivative assets		—		1,241			—		1,241			—		2,173			—		2,173

Total	$	1,015,891	$	1,579,105		$	—	$	2,594,996		$	1,399,431	$	1,437,891		$	—	$	2,837,322

Liabilities:
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities	$	—	$	(2,842	)	$	—	$	(2,842	)	$	—	$	(1,678	)	$	—	$	(1,678	)

Total	$	—	$	(2,842	)	$	—	$	(2,842	)	$	—	$	(1,678	)	$	—	$	(1,678	)

The following table presents the activity in Level 3 instruments during the periods indicated below:


	Three Months Ended
	January 31, 2010		January 25, 2009
	Level 3		Level 3
	(In thousands)		(In thousands)

Balance, beginning of period	$	—	$	13,100
Total realized and unrealized losses:
Included in earnings		—		(2,334	)
Included in other comprehensive loss		—		(1,516	)
Purchases, sales, and maturities		—		(6,143	)
Transfers out of Level 3, net		—		(100	)

Balance, end of period	$	—	$	3,007

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis

Equity investments in privately-held companies are generally accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are periodically assessed for other-than-temporary impairment when an event or circumstance indicates that an other-than-temporary decline in value may have occurred. If Applied determines that an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, the investment will be written down to its estimated fair value based on available information, such as pricing in recent rounds of financing, current cash positions, earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance and any other readily available market data. Equity investments in privately-held companies totaled $68 million at January 31, 2010, of which $52 million of investments were accounted for under the cost method of accounting and $16 million of investments had been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three months ended January 31, 2010 due to an other-than-temporary decline in value. During the three months ended January 25, 2009, Applied did not record any other-than-temporary impairments on those assets required to be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

The following table presents the balance of equity securities at January 31, 2010 that had been measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, using the process described above, and the impairment charges recorded during the three months then ended:


							Total Impairment
							For the Three
							Months Ended
							January 31,
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		2010
	(In thousands)

Equity investments in privately-held companies measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three months ended January 31, 2010	$	—	$	—	$	15,881	$	1,190

Other

The carrying amounts of Applied’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes payable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate fair value due to the short maturities of these financial instruments. At January 31, 2010, the carrying amount of long-term debt was $213 million and the estimated fair value was $240 million. At October 25, 2009, the carrying amount of long-term debt was $202 million and the estimated fair value was $216 million. The estimated fair value of long-term debt is determined by Level 2 inputs and is based primarily on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities [Abstract]

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities


Note 6	Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative instruments and hedging activities, including foreign currency exchange contracts, are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge treatment, as well as the ineffective portion of any hedges, are recognized currently in earnings. All of Applied’s derivative financial instruments are recorded at their fair value in other current assets or accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Applied conducts business in a number of foreign countries, with certain transactions denominated in local currencies, such as Japanese yen, euro, Israeli shekel and Swiss francs. The purpose of Applied’s foreign currency management is to mitigate the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated revenues, costs and eventual cash flows. The terms of currency instruments used for hedging purposes are generally consistent with the timing of the transactions being hedged. Applied does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Applied uses derivative financial instruments, such as forward exchange contracts and currency option contracts, to hedge certain forecasted foreign currency denominated transactions expected to occur typically within the next 24 months. Hedges related to anticipated transactions are designated and documented at the inception of the hedge as cash flow hedges and are typically entered into once per month. Cash flow hedges are evaluated for effectiveness quarterly. The effective portion of the gain or loss on these hedges is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (AOCI) in stockholders’ equity and is reclassified into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. The majority of the after-tax net income or loss related to derivative instruments included in AOCI at January 31, 2010 is expected to be reclassified into earnings within 12 months. Changes in the fair value of currency forward exchange and option contracts due to changes in time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness. Both ineffective hedge amounts and hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized promptly in earnings. If the transaction being hedged is no longer probable to occur, or if a portion of any derivative is deemed to be ineffective, Applied promptly recognizes the gain or loss on the associated financial instrument in general and administrative expenses. The amount recognized due to discontinuance of cash flow hedges that were probable not to occur by the end of the originally specified time period was not significant for the three months ended January 31, 2010 and January 25, 2009.

Forward exchange contracts are generally used to hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. These derivatives are typically entered into once per month and are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of these hedges are recorded promptly in earnings to offset the changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.

Fair values of derivative instruments were as follows:

January 31, 2010

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

Balance Sheet

Location

Fair Value

Location

Fair Value

(In thousands)

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts

Other current
assets

717

Accounts payable
and accrued
expenses

1,967

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts

Other current
assets

524

Accounts payable
and accrued
expenses

875

Total derivatives

1,241

2,842

October 25, 2009

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

Balance Sheet

Location

Fair Value

Location

Fair Value

(In thousands)

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts

Other current
assets

1,811

Accounts payable
and accrued
expenses

1,225

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts

Other current
assets

362

Accounts payable
and accrued
expenses

453

Total derivatives

2,173

1,678

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations for the three months ended January 31, 2010 was as follows:


	Three Months Ended January 31, 2010
	Effective Portion							Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from
				Location of Gain				Effectiveness Testing
	Gain or (Loss)			or (Loss)	Gain or (Loss)			Location of Gain	Gain or (Loss)
	Recognized in			Reclassified from	Reclassified from			or (Loss)	Recognized in
	AOCI			AOCI into Income	AOCI into Income			Recognized in Income	Income
	(In thousands)

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

Foreign exchange contracts	$	(2,835	)	Cost of products sold	$	(1,757	)	Cost of products sold	$	(304	)
Foreign exchange contracts		—		General and administrative		1,037		General and administrative		(566	)
Foreign exchange contracts		—		Research, development and engineering		(82	)	Research, development and engineering		—

Total	$	(2,835	)		$	(802	)		$	(870	)


		Three Months
		Ended January 31, 2010
	Location of Gain	Amount of Gain
	or (Loss)	or (Loss)
	Recognized	Recognized
	in Income	in Income

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts	General and administrative	$	(10,460	)

Total		$	(10,460	)

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations for the three months ended January 25, 2009 was as follows:


	Three Months Ended January 25, 2009
	Effective Portion							Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from
				Location of Gain				Effectiveness Testing
	Gain or (Loss)			or (Loss)	Gain or (Loss)			Location of Gain	Gain or (Loss)
	Recognized in			Reclassified from	Reclassified from			or (Loss)	Recognized in
	AOCI			AOCI into Income	AOCI into Income			Recognized in Income	Income
	(In thousands)

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

Foreign exchange contracts	$	(11,523	)	Cost of products sold	$	(11,510	)	Cost of products sold	$	(2,220	)
Foreign exchange contracts		—		General and administrative		(6,215	)	General and administrative		(1,501	)
Foreign exchange contracts		—		Research, development and engineering		(81	)	Research, development and engineering		—

Total	$	(11,523	)		$	(17,806	)		$	(3,721	)


		Three Months
		Ended January 25,
		2009
	Location of Gain	Amount of Gain
	or (Loss)	or (Loss)
	Recognized	Recognized
	in Income	in Income

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts	General and administrative	$	(29,656	)

Total		$	(29,656	)

Credit Risk Contingent Features

If Applied’s credit rating were to fall below investment grade, it would be in violation of credit risk contingent provisions of the derivative instruments discussed above, and certain counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk related contingent features that were in a liability position was immaterial as of January 31, 2010.

Entering into foreign exchange contracts with banks exposes Applied to credit-related losses in the event of the banks’ nonperformance. However, Applied’s exposure is not considered significant.

Goodwill, Purchased Technology and Other Intangible Assets

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Goodwill, Purchased Technology and Other Intangible Assets [Abstract]

Goodwill, Purchased Technology and Other Intangible Assets


Note 9	Goodwill, Purchased Technology and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

Goodwill and purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For goodwill, Applied performs a two-step impairment test. In the first step, Applied compares the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. Applied’s reporting units are consistent with the reportable segments identified in Note 18, based on the manner in which Applied operates its business and the nature of those operations. Applied determines the fair value of each of its reporting units based on a weighting of income and market approaches. Under the income approach, Applied calculates the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Under the market approach, Applied estimates the fair value based on market multiples of revenue or earnings for comparable companies. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is performed. If the carrying value of the net assets assigned to the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then Applied would perform the second step of the impairment test in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. Applied would then allocate the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit, as if Applied had acquired the reporting unit in a business combination, with the fair value of the reporting unit being the “purchase price.” The excess of the “purchase price” over the carrying amounts assigned to assets and liabilities representing the implied fair value of goodwill. If Applied determined that the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeded its implied fair value, Applied would record an impairment loss equal to the difference.

Applied conducted these impairment tests in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, and the results of these tests indicated that Applied’s goodwill and purchased intangible assets with indefinite useful lives were not impaired.

Applied’s methodology for allocating the purchase price relating to purchase acquisitions is determined through established and generally accepted valuation techniques. Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of the acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed. Applied assigns assets acquired (including goodwill) and liabilities assumed to a reporting unit as of the date of acquisition. Typically, acquisitions relate to a single reporting unit and thus do not require the allocation of goodwill to multiple reporting units. If the products obtained in an acquisition are assigned to multiple reporting units, the goodwill is distributed to the respective reporting units as part of the purchase price allocation process.

Details of indefinite-lived intangible assets were as follows:


	January 31, 2010								October 25, 2009
				Other								Other
				Intangible								Intangible
	Goodwill			Assets		Total			Goodwill			Assets		Total
	(In thousands)

Gross carrying amount	$	1,382,296		$	17,400	$	1,399,696		$	1,216,802		$	17,860	$	1,234,662
Accumulated amortization		(45,870	)		—		(45,870	)		(45,870	)		—		(45,870	)

	$	1,336,426		$	17,400	$	1,353,826		$	1,170,932		$	17,860	$	1,188,792

From October 25, 2009 to January 31, 2010, goodwill increased by $158 million due to the acquisition of Semitool, Inc. (Semitool) and by $7 million due to an asset purchase from Advent Solar, Inc. (Advent Solar) (see Note 19). Other intangible assets that are not subject to amortization consist primarily of a trade name. As of January 31, 2010, indefinite-lived intangible assets by reportable segment were: Energy and Environmental Solutions, $661 million; Silicon, $382 million; Applied Global Services, $195 million; and Display, $116 million.

Finite-Lived Purchased Intangible Assets

Applied amortizes purchased intangible assets with finite lives using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets, ranging from 1 to 15 years.

Applied evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable. Applied assesses the fair value of the assets based on the amount of the undiscounted future cash flow that the assets are expected to generate and recognizes an impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to result from the use of the asset, plus net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When Applied identifies an impairment, Applied reduces the carrying value of the group of assets to comparable market values, when available and appropriate, or to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach.

Intangible assets, such as purchased technology, are generally recorded in connection with a business acquisition. The value assigned to intangible assets is usually based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for the success and life cycle of products and technology acquired. Applied evaluates the useful lives of its intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances require revising the remaining period of amortization. In addition, Applied reviews intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable. Management considers such indicators as significant differences in actual product acceptance from the estimates, changes in the competitive and economic environment, technological advances, and changes in cost structure.

Details of amortized intangible assets were as follows:


	January 31, 2010									October 25, 2009
				Other									Other
	Purchased			Intangible						Purchased			Intangible
	Technology			Assets			Total			Technology			Assets			Total
	(In thousands)

Gross carrying amount	$	618,442		$	351,843		$	970,285		$	554,920		$	329,629		$	884,549
Accumulated amortization		(403,012	)		(210,673	)		(613,685	)		(400,093	)		(195,900	)		(595,993	)

	$	215,430		$	141,170		$	356,600		$	154,827		$	133,729		$	288,556

From October 25, 2009 to January 31, 2010, the change in gross carrying amount of the amortized intangible assets was approximately $86 million, primarily due to the acquisition of Semitool (see Note 19). Aggregate amortization expense was $25 million and $22 million for the three months ended January 31, 2010 and January 25, 2009, respectively. As of January 31, 2010, future estimated amortization expense is expected to be $51 million for the remainder of fiscal 2010, $62 million for fiscal 2011, $59 million for fiscal 2012, $53 million for fiscal 2013, $49 million for fiscal 2014, and $83 million thereafter. As of January 31, 2010, amortized intangible assets by reportable segment were: Energy and Environmental Solutions, $196 million; Silicon, $99 million; Applied Global Services, $35 million; and Display, $27 million.

Warranty, Guarantees and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Warranty Guarantees and Contingencies [Abstract]

Warranty Guarantees And Contingencies


Note 12	Warranty, Guarantees and Contingencies

Warranty

Changes in the warranty reserves during the three months ended January 31, 2010 and January 25, 2009 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 31,			January 25,
	2010			2009
	(In thousands)

Beginning balance	$	117,537		$	142,846
Provisions for warranty		34,476			23,546
Consumption of reserves		(14,583	)		(22,669	)

Ending balance	$	137,430		$	143,723

Applied products are generally sold with a 12-month warranty period following installation. The provision for the estimated cost of warranty is recorded when revenue is recognized. Parts and labor are covered under the terms of the warranty agreement. The warranty provision is based on historical experience by product, configuration and geographic region. Quarterly warranty consumption is generally associated with sales that occurred during the preceding four quarters, and quarterly warranty provisions are generally related to the current quarter’s sales.

Guarantees

During the ordinary course of business, Applied provides standby letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to certain parties as required for certain transactions initiated by either Applied or its subsidiaries. As of January 31, 2010, the maximum potential amount of future payments that Applied could be required to make under these guarantee arrangements was $54 million. Applied has not recorded any liability in connection with these guarantee arrangements beyond that required to account for the underlying transaction being guaranteed. Applied does not believe, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under these guarantee arrangements.

Applied also has agreements with various global banks to facilitate subsidiary banking operations world-wide, including overdraft arrangements, bank guarantees and letters of credit. As of January 31, 2010, Applied Materials, Inc. has provided parent guarantees to banks for approximately $176 million to cover these arrangements.

Legal matters

Semitool Shareholder Litigation

On November 17, 2009, Applied announced that it was making a tender offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Semitool in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into with Semitool. Following this announcement, three lawsuits were filed by Semitool shareholders in the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District Court for the State of Montana, County of Flathead, against Semitool, Semitool’s directors, Applied and Applied’s acquisition subsidiary. The actions seek certification of a class of all holders of Semitool common stock, except the defendants and their affiliates. The complaints allege that Semitool’s directors breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, failing to maximize shareholder value and failing to disclose material information, and that Applied aided and abetted such alleged breaches. The actions sought injunctive relief enjoining the defendants from consummating the transaction, as well as damages and attorneys’ fees.

On December 14, 2009, all parties in these cases reached an agreement in principle to settle the matters and the plaintiffs withdrew their motion to enjoin consummation of the transaction. Without admitting any wrongdoing or fault, Semitool disclosed certain additional information in its Schedule 14D-9 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2009. Following the tender of shares representing over 95% of the outstanding shares of Semitool common stock, the merger of Semitool into Applied’s acquisition subsidiary was completed on December 21, 2009. Pursuant to a memorandum of understanding between the parties, plaintiffs may conduct reasonable discovery to confirm the fairness and reasonableness of the settlement and defendants will not object to an application by plaintiffs’ counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses up to $200,000. A class of Semitool’s public shareholders will be certified solely for purposes of settlement, which, if approved by the Court, will result in a complete and final discharge of all claims on behalf of the class.

Jusung

Applied has been engaged in a number of lawsuits and patent and administrative proceedings in Taiwan and South Korea since 2003 with Jusung Engineering Co., Ltd. (Jusung Engineering) and/or Jusung Pacific Co., Ltd. (Jusung Pacific, referred to together with Jusung Engineering as Jusung) involving technology used in manufacturing LCDs. Applied believes that it has meritorious claims and defenses against Jusung that it intends to pursue vigorously.

In 2004, Applied filed a complaint for patent infringement against Jusung in the Hsinchu District Court in Taiwan seeking damages and a permanent injunction for infringement of a patent related to chemical vapor deposition (CVD) equipment, and this case remains pending. Jusung Pacific unsuccessfully sought invalidation of Applied’s CVD patent in the Taiwanese Intellectual Property Office (TIPO). Jusung Pacific’s initial appeal of the TIPO’s decision was denied, and it has filed a further appeal to the Taipei High Supreme Administrative Court.

In 2006, Applied filed an action in the TIPO challenging the validity of a patent owned by Jusung Engineering related to severability of the transfer chamber on a CVD tool. Jusung Engineering filed a lawsuit against Applied and AKT America in Hsinchu District Court in Taiwan alleging infringement of the same patent. The TIPO granted Applied’s request for invalidation and revoked Jusung Engineering’s patent. In March 2009, the Hsinchu District Court dismissed Jusung Engineering’s lawsuit, and in April 2009, the Ministry of Economic Affairs overruled Jusung Engineering’s administrative appeal of the decision revoking its patent. Jusung appealed both decisions. On January 7, 2010, the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court granted Jusung’s appeal of the decision revoking its patent and remanded the matter to the TIPO for reconsideration of validity. In November 2009, Applied filed an action in China with the Patent Reexamination Board of the State Intellectual Property Office seeking to invalidate this patent.

In 2006, Jusung Engineering filed a complaint of private prosecution in the Taipei District Court of Taiwan alleging that Applied’s outside counsel received from the Court and used a copy of an expert report that Jusung had filed in the ongoing patent infringement lawsuits that Jusung had intended to remain confidential. The complaint names as defendants Applied’s outside counsel in Taiwan, as well as Michael R. Splinter, Applied’s President and Chief Executive Officer, as the statutory representative of Applied. The Taipei District Court dismissed the private prosecution complaint, and the matter was transferred to the Taipei District Attorney’s Office. The Taipei District Attorney’s Office has issued three successive rulings not to prosecute, each of which Jusung Engineering has appealed to the Taiwan High Court District Attorney. In each instance, the Taiwan High Court District Attorney has returned the matter to the Taipei District Attorney’s Office for further consideration, where it remains pending.

From time to time, Applied receives notification from third parties, including customers and suppliers, seeking indemnification, litigation support, payment of money or other actions by Applied in connection with claims made against them. In addition, from time to time, Applied receives notification from third parties claiming that Applied may be or is infringing or misusing their intellectual property or other rights. Applied also is subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, both asserted and unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business.

Although the outcome of the above-described matters or these claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, Applied does not believe that any of these proceedings or other claims will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Stockholders Equity

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]

Stockholders' Equity


Note 14	Stockholders’ Equity

Comprehensive Income

Components of comprehensive income (loss), on an after-tax basis where applicable, were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 31,			January 25,
	2010			2009
	(In thousands)

Net income (loss)	$	82,751		$	(132,934	)
Pension liability adjustment		74			112
Change in unrealized net gain on investments		2,121			16,474
Change in unrealized net loss on derivative instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges		(1,299	)		(210	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		273			(1,310	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	83,920		$	(117,868	)

Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, on an after-tax basis where applicable, were as follows:


	January 31,			October 25,
	2010			2009
	(In thousands)

Pension liability	$	(32,090	)	$	(32,164	)
Retiree medical benefits		15			15
Unrealized gain on investments net		22,093			19,972
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges		(989	)		310
Cumulative translation adjustments		10,460			10,187

	$	(511	)	$	(1,680	)

Stock Repurchase Program

On September 15, 2006, Applied’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for up to $5.0 billion in repurchases over the three years ending in September 2009. Under this authorization, Applied implemented a systematic stock repurchase program and also made supplemental repurchases of its common stock from time to time in the open market, depending on market conditions, stock price and other factors, for a total of $2.7 billion. In November 2008, Applied announced that it was suspending stock repurchases in light of uncertain global economic and market conditions. During the three months ended January 25, 2009, prior to such suspension, Applied repurchased 1,942,000 shares of its common stock at an average price of $11.80 per share for a total cash outlay of $23 million.

Dividends

In December 2009, Applied’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.06 per share that will be paid on March 17, 2010 to stockholders of record as of February 24, 2010. The declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on Applied’s financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, business conditions and other factors, as well as a determination by the Board of Directors that cash dividends are in the best interest of Applied’s stockholders.

Industry Segment Operations

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Industry Segment Operations [Abstract]

Industry Segment Operations


Note 18	Industry Segment Operations

Applied’s four reportable segments are: Silicon, Applied Global Services, Display, and Energy and Environmental Solutions. Applied’s chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the President and Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company. Segment information is presented based upon Applied’s management organization structure as of January 31, 2010 and the distinctive nature of each segment. Future changes to this internal financial structure may result in changes to the Company’s reportable segments.

Each reportable segment is separately managed and has separate financial results that are reviewed by Applied’s chief operating decision-maker. Each reportable segment contains closely related products that are unique to the particular segment. Segment operating income is determined based upon internal performance measures used by Applied’s chief operating decision-maker.

Applied derives the segment results directly from its internal management reporting system. The accounting policies Applied uses to derive reportable segment results are substantially the same as those used for external reporting purposes. Effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, Applied changed its methodology for allocating certain expenses to its reportable segments. Applied has reclassified segment operating results for the three months ended January 25, 2009 to conform to the fiscal 2010 presentation. Management measures the performance of each reportable segment based upon several metrics including orders, net sales and operating income. Management uses these results to evaluate the performance of, and to assign resources to, each of the reportable segments. Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments certain operating expenses that it manages separately at the corporate level, which include costs related to equity-based compensation and certain corporate functions (certain management, finance, legal, human resources, and research, development and engineering), and unabsorbed information technology and occupancy. In addition, Applied does not allocate to its reportable segments restructuring and asset impairment charges and any associated adjustments related to restructuring actions. Segment operating income excludes interest income/expense and other financial charges and income taxes according to how a particular reportable segment’s management is measured. Management does not consider the unallocated costs in measuring the performance of the reportable segments.

The Silicon segment includes semiconductor capital equipment for etch, rapid thermal processing, deposition, chemical mechanical planarization, and metrology and inspection.

The Applied Global Services segment includes technically differentiated products and services to improve operating efficiency, reduce operating costs and lessen the environmental impact of semiconductor, display and solar customers’ factories. Applied Global Services’ products consist of spares, services, certain earlier generation products, and remanufactured equipment. Customer demand for these products and services is fulfilled through a global distribution system with trained service engineers located in close proximity to customer sites.

The Display segment encompasses products for manufacturing LCDs for TVs, personal computers and other video-enabled devices. The Display segment also includes the design and manufacture of differentiated stand-alone equipment for the Applied SunFab thin film line.

The Energy and Environmental Solutions segment includes products for fabricating solar photovoltaic cells and modules, high throughput roll-to-roll coating systems for flexible electronics and web products, and systems used in the manufacture of energy-efficient glass.

Net sales and operating income (loss) for each reportable segment for the three months ended January 31, 2010 and January 25, 2009 were as follows:


			Operating
	Net Sales		Income (loss)
	(In thousands)

2010:
Silicon	$	970,164	$	305,995
Applied Global Services		425,552		63,158
Display		132,108		24,927
Energy and Environmental Solutions		321,078		(36,267	)

Total Segment	$	1,848,902	$	357,813

2009:
Silicon	$	546,011	$	46,239
Applied Global Services		345,094		25,904
Display		149,009		21,127
Energy and Environmental Solutions		293,282		(63,643	)

Total Segment	$	1,333,396	$	29,627

Reconciliations of total segment operating income to Applied’s consolidated operating income (loss) for the three months ended January 31, 2010 and January 25, 2009 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	January 31,			January 25,
	2010			2009
	(In thousands)

Total segment operating income	$	357,813		$	29,627
Corporate and unallocated costs		(137,626	)		(92,947	)
Restructuring and asset impairment charges		(103,844	)		(132,772	)

Income (loss) from operations	$	116,343		$	(196,092	)

Business Combinations

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Business Combinations


Note 19	Business Combinations

On December 21, 2009, Applied acquired Semitool, a public company based in the state of Montana, for a purchase price of $323 million in cash, net of cash acquired, pursuant to a tender offer and subsequent short-form merger. The acquired business is a leading supplier of electrochemical plating and wafer surface preparation equipment used by semiconductor packaging and manufacturing companies globally. Applied’s primary reasons for this acquisition were to complement its existing product offerings and to provide opportunities for future growth. The acquired business will be included in the Silicon segment results beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2010.

In November 2009, Applied acquired substantially all the assets, including the intellectual property, of Advent Solar, a developer of advanced technology for crystalline silicon (c-Si) PVs. This acquisition complemented Applied’s portfolio of solar PV technologies and enhanced Applied’s position in the c-Si equipment market. The acquisition is included in results for the Energy and Environmental Solutions segment.

Applied allocated the purchase price of each of these acquisitions to tangible assets, liabilities and identifiable intangible assets acquired, based on their estimated fair values. The excess of purchase price over the aggregate fair values was recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to identifiable intangible assets acquired was based on estimates and assumptions made by management. These estimates were determined through established and generally accepted calculation techniques. Applied calculated the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired to allocate the purchase prices at the respective acquisition dates. Based upon these calculations, the purchase prices for the above acquisitions were allocated as follows:


	Acquisitions
Fair Market Values	2010
	(In thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents	$	38,744
Accounts receivable, net		37,961
Inventories		61,838
Other current assets		3,837
Property and equipment, net		45,578
Goodwill		165,495
Purchased intangible assets		93,376

Total assets acquired		446,829
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(46,246	)
Other liabilities		(25,240	)

Total liabilities assumed		(71,486	)

Purchase price allocated	$	375,343


	Useful	Acquisitions
	Life	2010
	(In years)	(In thousands)

Developed technology	6-10	$	65,700
Customer relationships	8		10,900
Trade names	3-10		5,700
Patents and trademarks	7-10		5,462
Backlog	1		4,100
Other	5		1,514

		$	93,376

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

3 Months Ended

Jan. 31, 2010

Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements


Note 20	Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, which requires additional disclosures and clarifications to existing disclosures. This authoritative guidance requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and also to describe the reasons for these transfers. This authoritative guidance also requires enhanced disclosure of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures for Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements becomes effective the first interim reporting period after December 15, 2009 and will be effective for Applied in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Disclosures regarding activity within Level 3 fair value measurements becomes effective the first interim reporting period after December 15, 2010 and will be effective for Applied in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Applied is evaluating the potential impact of the implementation of this authoritative guidance on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 5 for information and related disclosures regarding Applied’s fair value measurements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on variable interest entities, which requires revised evaluations of whether entities represent variable interest entities, ongoing assessments of control over such entities, and additional disclosures for variable interests. In December 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the financial reporting by entities involved with variable interest entities which amends previously issued guidance on variable interest entities. The amendments in this authoritative guidance replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which reporting entity, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which reporting entity has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. This authoritative guidance becomes effective the first annual reporting period after November 15, 2009 and will be effective for Applied in fiscal 2011. Applied is evaluating the potential impact of the implementation of this authoritative guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

Subsequent Events	3 Months Ended
Subsequent Events	Jan. 31, 2010
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
Subsequent Events	Note 21 Subsequent Events On March 8, 2010, Applied’s Board of Directors approved an increase in the quarterly cash dividend to $0.07 per share, payable on June 16, 2010 to stockholders of record as of May 26, 2010. Applied’s Board of Directors also approved a new stock repurchase program authorizing up to $2 billion in repurchases over the next three years ending in March 2013.